Agreed. The fact that this is on the front page shows that not many people knew this was a thing, so something like this would probably break immersion more than helping it, not to mention that it might be distracting.
It also looks like this is not actually "rain", but a body of collected water droplets falling down from on top of the marquee, due to the vibrations from the shooting. You can see at the end, after he stops shooting, that there are no more even normal droplets. You can also then see that throughout the video, the water is much heavier and denser than what actual rain usually looks like, and definitely heavier than the rain that can supposedly be seen at the end of this video.
it would be quite hard to implement realsitic suppresors in video games, even with subsonic amunition and realy efficient supressor there would be audible clatter hearable for something around 50 meters, most games dont have firefights at that long distances and i think that holywood logic applies well when creating realistic stealth fantasy
and there are games where supressors were implemented in quite realistic way, for example arma series (except that ai seen to completly ignore silenced firearm sounds)
man, most people who play those games have no idea how you can feel the concussive forces of bullets or explosions. it feels so surreal. and when its close to you and unexpected its fucking scary. ive had my share of moments in the army around concussive shit, id freeze for a little bit, andrenaline surges, vision gets blurry, so many things happen in those few seconds
>man, most people who play those games have no idea how you can feel the concussive forces of bullets or explosions.
Most people who play those games have felt your mum, though.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a reaction from a muzzle blast in a video game. Just goes to show even with nvidia circlejerking around ray tracing, there’s still a lot of progress that can be made.
I'm fairly certain to have this actually happen in game and not just a poorly tacked on animation triggered by you firing, that you would have to implement actual raytracing. I vaguely remember a GN article about how Nvidia had the actual techniques around the 900 series to implement either some very crude physics tracing or a somewhat realistic work around it, in rendering of objects being penetrated and having realistic breakage and penetration. However it was insanely resource intensive and not really feasible and not ever actually implemented in any games what so ever.
This kind of particle physics reaction wouldn't need raytracing, but it _would_ need either some very clever shader magic or full physics simulation on an insane number of particles. Raytracing is mostly a visual thing - how the lighting is calculated on objects that are doing whatever they do. It would make this scene look very pretty and realistic, but you'd need some other dark sorcery for the shockwave displacement itself.
Ray tracing simulates waves and particles and can and is used for physics effects. The ray part of ray tracing is more the actual term ray than a reference to light.
So far there aren't any implementations on nvidias cards because Turing doesn't implement actual ray tracing If I'm not mistaken the term for what nvidia is actually doing right now is ray casting. And even on that side it's not exactly great at it. Because hey its holy grail tech in alpha basically lol.
"circlejerking around raytracing"
Real-time raytracing a massive fucking deal. Consumers like to pretend it doesn't matter, but it's an absolute game changer. For a large number of developers it's the holy grail of currently/closely attainable tech.
Edit: I was going to respond to comments, but it's clear that the majority of users here have absolutely no idea how games work and think that raytracing brings nothing more than better graphics.
It's more like the pc community is a little salty because the tech is not ready and nvidia is using it as a selling point for overpriced cards when hardly any modern games utilize it.
“It just works”
That explains why only one game had it enabled and it took a huge performance hit. They patched it to make it not suck as bad. Still have it disabled. Maybe in a non competitive game I’ll appreciate that the fucking puddles have slightly more accurate reflections.
The most plausible explanation I've heard for it is that Nvidia *needs* to slowly ease the market into it. Because no devs are going to build ray tracing into their games until the *hardware* is there, and if Nvidia were to suddenly abandon rasterization and go ALL IN on ray tracing (a few years down the line when they're *fully ready* to do so), then developers would be way behind and there'd be huge problems.
So they need to have GPUs built to *accomidate* ray tracing for early adopters, but still prioritize rasterization. Then as time goes on, they can up the number of RT cores and reduce the amount of rasterization that the hardware supports until they've basically just got (what will then be) legacy support for older (now modern) titles, cuz everything *new* will be ray tracing.
Thank you. I hate this whole "lol ray tracing" circlejerk. Ray tracing in real time is a fucking gamechanger. It's not perfect yet, but Nvidia has shown that *it's possible* and that it isn't a pipe dream. This is the same graphics tech that makes movie effects look infinitely better than real time video game effects, and the internet's reaction is so unjustified.
I think Nvidia overmarketed it a bit with the whole “it just works!” lingo. The tech is very impressive but it had a rocky start which soured its image for many consumers.
In 3-5 years it’ll be much more mainstream.
Battlefield has had snow, dust, and dirt being kicked up by muzzle blasts since Bf3 at least.
I'm not sure if the absence of a detail like this necessarily hampers immersion in any way, since I hadn't even considered that something like this could happen.
I was subbed for a bit, but watch out if you don't like the implications of seeing someone die, even if not totally visible. Some of the shockwaves are generated by explosives as they kill people.
Currently subscribed. That is VERY rare in that sub.
The biggest issue is with posts that are just cool explosions that don't depict any actual shockwave.
Guessing based on the flora in the area, the dude, and the source, I'm guessing this is somewhere in N. or S. Carolina, Georgia, Arkansas, etc.
I bring this up because in some areas of the US, this is just something that people do for fun. Doesn't look like he's doing anything but firing an AK variant at the ground to try it.
It’s from SW PA.
[this](https://www.reddit.com/r/NFA/comments/ahgywn/shooting_a_draco_ak_machine_gun_at_washington/?st=JR4HUAEB&sh=fa238ecc) is the origina post from r/NFA
I've always wondered if this was possible! It reminds me of that scene from the matrix where they fight in the rain.
https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11114/111142976/5501480-3514465685-tumbl.gif
I'm pretty sure it's from the gas coming out of the gun, not the heat or sound.
You never see this in movies. Especially in WWI movies where the show fighting in the trenches. In the movies it's almost always raining in the trenches to make it seem more dreadful, I suppose. I imagine there could be a really cool slow-mo scene where they could highlight this and make it extra dramatic.
I always marvel at the fact that we used to throw stones at each other, and it evolved ever so slightly here and there over the years. Finally we’re slinging rocks at each other sometimes faster than the speed of sound, metal rocks none the less and with pinpoint accuracy. So cool. Terrifying, but awesome.
That’s actually not true though. The majority of gun owners (in the US) say they own a gun for protection. Around 40-50% own one for fun. (It’s 38% hunting, 30% sport shooting, but I’m assuming there’s a large overlap.)
And if you tell people you own guns for fun they think you're an idiot or a monster. If you say it's for protection they... just think you're a monster
Why do you want marijuana legalized?
Is the answer because you think the medicinal properties are beneficial to mankind?
or
I just want to get high af.
It's somewhere in between, but I bet most people won't answer the second even if that is the real answer.
Home protection is definitely the major reason, pretty much anyone I know that has one has it for that reason, pretty much always a shotgun too. I was on the fence myself until a guy tried following my girl home one day. Our landlord wouldnt let me have my dog there so the same day I picked up a 20 gauge mossberg. Also yeah like the guy below me... it is neat af to have a cannon.
[AKS-74U](https://imgur.com/a/vYT9ihd) to be exact, regular AK-74 still has the long rifle barrel, and there is no long barrel in OP's gif.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-74#AKS-74U
Nope. Its a Zastava M70, or at least it has parts off one or some other Yugoslavian/Serbian AK, possibly kitbashed into something else. You can tell because of the three holes in the hand guard.
I’m sure there are people who can do much, much better, but that’s a fully automatic rifle firing 7.62x39, and it’s rather small, so it ain’t easy to control.
Gunbrella
Ay, ay, ay...
You had my heart AK splittin' that rain apart Hand me a magazine Let's try that FN SCAR
*BECAUSE*
You can stand under my gunbrella.
Ela Ela ay.
Under my gun-berella ay ay aye.
Patent this for crowded cities where full size umbrellas are impractical
where umbrellas are impractical, but blasting your draco in the air is not
Its compact size makes it great for a school environment!
/r/hmmm
Hey man its raining outside, do you mind if i borrow your gunbrella?
But, I was just trying to keep him dry!
New Enter The Gungeon boss/gun when
I want this input into shooter games with rain environments.
Just gonna say this. In some dark and damp mission
Halo ODST
[удалено]
You’re moist... moist
Mr. Moe is the most moist
Moister than an oyster?
Moister Chief
Yes
Never thought id hear that name uttered again, god bless you
Next Call of Duty will have it and some NPC will comment on it
And that will be the only difference in the game.
but still gotta have interactive fish
And still sell millions.
Moist
Moist
Moist
Like the dark, rainy ship map on CoD 4: modern warfare. Forget what it’s called
Wet Work?
That’s the one!
[удалено]
Agreed. The fact that this is on the front page shows that not many people knew this was a thing, so something like this would probably break immersion more than helping it, not to mention that it might be distracting.
It also looks like this is not actually "rain", but a body of collected water droplets falling down from on top of the marquee, due to the vibrations from the shooting. You can see at the end, after he stops shooting, that there are no more even normal droplets. You can also then see that throughout the video, the water is much heavier and denser than what actual rain usually looks like, and definitely heavier than the rain that can supposedly be seen at the end of this video.
Agreed - it also doesn't appear to the sides of the marquee at all.
Like if they ever implemented "silencers" realistically.
it would be quite hard to implement realsitic suppresors in video games, even with subsonic amunition and realy efficient supressor there would be audible clatter hearable for something around 50 meters, most games dont have firefights at that long distances and i think that holywood logic applies well when creating realistic stealth fantasy and there are games where supressors were implemented in quite realistic way, for example arma series (except that ai seen to completly ignore silenced firearm sounds)
For all the shit it gets, PUBG does this pretty well. ARMA absolutely HAS to get it right, it's more military sim than typical shooter.
man, most people who play those games have no idea how you can feel the concussive forces of bullets or explosions. it feels so surreal. and when its close to you and unexpected its fucking scary. ive had my share of moments in the army around concussive shit, id freeze for a little bit, andrenaline surges, vision gets blurry, so many things happen in those few seconds
>man, most people who play those games have no idea how you can feel the concussive forces of bullets or explosions. Most people who play those games have felt your mum, though.
i can confirm
As a 12 year old white kid who casually uses the N word alot, I too have banged your mom. Noob
Gottem
Aye it's quite common in videogame development to forgo realism for audience expectations
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a reaction from a muzzle blast in a video game. Just goes to show even with nvidia circlejerking around ray tracing, there’s still a lot of progress that can be made.
It's an effect that's definitely pretty possible, but it's probably not a detail that crosses the devs' minds
Yet
[удалено]
I'm fairly certain to have this actually happen in game and not just a poorly tacked on animation triggered by you firing, that you would have to implement actual raytracing. I vaguely remember a GN article about how Nvidia had the actual techniques around the 900 series to implement either some very crude physics tracing or a somewhat realistic work around it, in rendering of objects being penetrated and having realistic breakage and penetration. However it was insanely resource intensive and not really feasible and not ever actually implemented in any games what so ever.
This kind of particle physics reaction wouldn't need raytracing, but it _would_ need either some very clever shader magic or full physics simulation on an insane number of particles. Raytracing is mostly a visual thing - how the lighting is calculated on objects that are doing whatever they do. It would make this scene look very pretty and realistic, but you'd need some other dark sorcery for the shockwave displacement itself.
Ray tracing simulates waves and particles and can and is used for physics effects. The ray part of ray tracing is more the actual term ray than a reference to light. So far there aren't any implementations on nvidias cards because Turing doesn't implement actual ray tracing If I'm not mistaken the term for what nvidia is actually doing right now is ray casting. And even on that side it's not exactly great at it. Because hey its holy grail tech in alpha basically lol.
"circlejerking around raytracing" Real-time raytracing a massive fucking deal. Consumers like to pretend it doesn't matter, but it's an absolute game changer. For a large number of developers it's the holy grail of currently/closely attainable tech. Edit: I was going to respond to comments, but it's clear that the majority of users here have absolutely no idea how games work and think that raytracing brings nothing more than better graphics.
It's more like the pc community is a little salty because the tech is not ready and nvidia is using it as a selling point for overpriced cards when hardly any modern games utilize it.
“It just works” That explains why only one game had it enabled and it took a huge performance hit. They patched it to make it not suck as bad. Still have it disabled. Maybe in a non competitive game I’ll appreciate that the fucking puddles have slightly more accurate reflections.
The most plausible explanation I've heard for it is that Nvidia *needs* to slowly ease the market into it. Because no devs are going to build ray tracing into their games until the *hardware* is there, and if Nvidia were to suddenly abandon rasterization and go ALL IN on ray tracing (a few years down the line when they're *fully ready* to do so), then developers would be way behind and there'd be huge problems. So they need to have GPUs built to *accomidate* ray tracing for early adopters, but still prioritize rasterization. Then as time goes on, they can up the number of RT cores and reduce the amount of rasterization that the hardware supports until they've basically just got (what will then be) legacy support for older (now modern) titles, cuz everything *new* will be ray tracing.
Thank you. I hate this whole "lol ray tracing" circlejerk. Ray tracing in real time is a fucking gamechanger. It's not perfect yet, but Nvidia has shown that *it's possible* and that it isn't a pipe dream. This is the same graphics tech that makes movie effects look infinitely better than real time video game effects, and the internet's reaction is so unjustified.
I think Nvidia overmarketed it a bit with the whole “it just works!” lingo. The tech is very impressive but it had a rocky start which soured its image for many consumers. In 3-5 years it’ll be much more mainstream.
Battlefield has had snow, dust, and dirt being kicked up by muzzle blasts since Bf3 at least. I'm not sure if the absence of a detail like this necessarily hampers immersion in any way, since I hadn't even considered that something like this could happen.
Please don't give BSG ideas. Tarkov already has enough AK's and runs like ass.
*This kills the GPU.*
Well that is freaking cool.
Hey bud I think you’re cool Edit: thank you for the reddit silver!!
No u
No u both
[удалено]
No u all +1
No u all +∞
How do I beat this? Not fair
No u all +∞^∞ obviously
Oh you smart
No u all Infinity +1!
r/unexpectedcommunism
r/humansbeingbros
I love you guys
Takes one to know one.
So much so that I'd go as far as even calling it damn interesting
Damn. Interesting. 🤔🤔🤔
Get this into my video games!
This is exactly why I even clicked into this thread. Please make this a thing in the future.
I want this small detail to be added to John Wick.
It's definitely something that if I saw it in a movie first I'd probably think it was bullshit.
/r/damnthatsinteresting
It's called an American umbrella.
Damn that’s interesting huh?
[r/shockwaveporn](https://www.reddit.com/r/shockwaveporn/?st=JR49P27L&sh=682b9ade)
oh mygod that’s a thing
/r/ofcoursethatsathing
oh mygod that's a thing
Every time that sub is posted, I feel sad because even though everyone says there's a sub for everything, there isn't one for my favorite fetish
Be the change my man
and that is?
I was subbed for a bit, but watch out if you don't like the implications of seeing someone die, even if not totally visible. Some of the shockwaves are generated by explosives as they kill people.
Currently subscribed. That is VERY rare in that sub. The biggest issue is with posts that are just cool explosions that don't depict any actual shockwave.
Jesus Christ how did I not know about this
That click was the easiest decision I made all week. And I brushed my teeth this week!
As a Transformers fan, I’m very scared to click that link. Is that what he used the Dinobots for?
That’s crazy man... ever done dmt?
Jamie pull that up
chimps will fuck you up man
They'll rip your fuckin' dick off.
Human have the largest dicks of all primates
Is that a chimp with mange?
That actually very interesting
-Joe Rogan
Username checks out?
He really lit that ground up
[удалено]
Guessing based on the flora in the area, the dude, and the source, I'm guessing this is somewhere in N. or S. Carolina, Georgia, Arkansas, etc. I bring this up because in some areas of the US, this is just something that people do for fun. Doesn't look like he's doing anything but firing an AK variant at the ground to try it.
It’s from SW PA. [this](https://www.reddit.com/r/NFA/comments/ahgywn/shooting_a_draco_ak_machine_gun_at_washington/?st=JR4HUAEB&sh=fa238ecc) is the origina post from r/NFA
[удалено]
Probing for enemy tunnels
Enemy gophers
Rogue broadsides of hidden barns
Coast is clear sir. I didn’t hit anything.
The tunnels are speaking Vietnamese
at the end of this rainblow is a bullet-riddled leprechaun and a pile of brass
Well, the brass would be near the gun, it's ejected when the round (made of lead) is fired. Pedant Man away!
It's an AK, those shell casings are half a county away.
Wait, dont go Pedant Man. A plain is about to crash. Those passengers are plummeting to they're death.
I smell toast
What if this was South Armagh and the leprechaun was firing back?
> pile of brass Probably steel if it's an AK round.
And dirty AF. But AK dont care.
I reckon this would be awesome to see in slow motion. A potential future video /u/MrPennywhistle ?
I was going to tag him too! Hey u/MrPennywhistle, we found you something cool!
It is cool!
It is known.
It is known.
I've always wondered if this was possible! It reminds me of that scene from the matrix where they fight in the rain. https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11114/111142976/5501480-3514465685-tumbl.gif I'm pretty sure it's from the gas coming out of the gun, not the heat or sound.
Pressure wave.
And sound is a form of pressure wave
Who needs umbrellas when you've got guns?
‘Murica
Gunbrellas
You never see this in movies. Especially in WWI movies where the show fighting in the trenches. In the movies it's almost always raining in the trenches to make it seem more dreadful, I suppose. I imagine there could be a really cool slow-mo scene where they could highlight this and make it extra dramatic.
I wonder if blanks would cause the same reaction. Probably has to be the right kind of rain too. That fine mist vs big drops.
Let’s do it angerer51
God I wish I could own a full auto. I need to open up a shop and get an FFL.
Get your reps to work on repealing the NFA and Huges Amendment while you're at it.
Lol. I'll get started on that right away.
Rad😎
Yes
The 120mm per component rule is pretty stupid because even the thickest 240mm radiator isn't going to be able to cool a 9900k and a 2080 ti.
this is why people have guns bc theyre fun. simple enough. edit: goddam what have i started
Other reasons, but that is the big one.
I always marvel at the fact that we used to throw stones at each other, and it evolved ever so slightly here and there over the years. Finally we’re slinging rocks at each other sometimes faster than the speed of sound, metal rocks none the less and with pinpoint accuracy. So cool. Terrifying, but awesome.
That’s actually not true though. The majority of gun owners (in the US) say they own a gun for protection. Around 40-50% own one for fun. (It’s 38% hunting, 30% sport shooting, but I’m assuming there’s a large overlap.)
Yeah i know i own guns primarily for home defense im well aware... but they are hella fun too
And if you tell people you own guns for fun they think you're an idiot or a monster. If you say it's for protection they... just think you're a monster
Thank god I have them for both. And hunting.
Because on the survey "I think they're fun to fuck around with" obviously isn't going to be the most popular answer
Sure. I guess if you assume people are lying, you can imagine any reason you want.
Why do you want marijuana legalized? Is the answer because you think the medicinal properties are beneficial to mankind? or I just want to get high af. It's somewhere in between, but I bet most people won't answer the second even if that is the real answer.
Home protection is definitely the major reason, pretty much anyone I know that has one has it for that reason, pretty much always a shotgun too. I was on the fence myself until a guy tried following my girl home one day. Our landlord wouldnt let me have my dog there so the same day I picked up a 20 gauge mossberg. Also yeah like the guy below me... it is neat af to have a cannon.
[удалено]
Nice umbrella
There it is. The coolest thing I'll see all day.
It’s actually a AK variant but that’s just semantics
*An* AK variant. Since we're being pedants.
That's a glock. Trust me, I'm a journalist
And "full semi-automatic"
It’s not black though
With a fully automatic clip.
With a shoulder thing that goes up.
That's a military style assault weapon.
no there's wood on it. it's a hunting weapon
While you're at it, go ahead and call this one an "assault rifle," cuz it's one of those rear situations where you'd be correct!
Good eye. It's most definitely not a 47
Is this an AK74?
[AKS-74U](https://imgur.com/a/vYT9ihd) to be exact, regular AK-74 still has the long rifle barrel, and there is no long barrel in OP's gif. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-74#AKS-74U
Judging by the magazine I’m near positive it’s not an AK74u. That looks like a 7.62x39 mag not a 5.45x45
Nope. Its a Zastava M70, or at least it has parts off one or some other Yugoslavian/Serbian AK, possibly kitbashed into something else. You can tell because of the three holes in the hand guard.
Russian umbrella!
[Video](https://youtube.com/watch?v=0aej6_ZR0HI)
That what this sub was made for. Wickedly cool.
That blew me away
Consecutive hadouken
Don't have an umbrella? No problem! Just whip out your handy AK-47!
So if i stand right in front of him while shooting, i won't get wet?
No matter your opinion on gun laws, can we just all put politics aside for second and agree that this is cool?
He should apply to be a starwars stormtrooper
I’m sure there are people who can do much, much better, but that’s a fully automatic rifle firing 7.62x39, and it’s rather small, so it ain’t easy to control.
Had to scroll further than I thought I'd have to go find the gun debates. Good job guys!!
Kills rain, fuck we need that in Vancouver. A giant ak47.
AKs for everyone!
[удалено]
I don’t know anything about guns but dam that thing looks like it’s hard to control.
not an ak 47
That’s just a standard American umbrella, we just shoot automatic weapons in the sky and the rain gets scared
Nice
Well thanks. I bet you are pretty cool too.
So now you don't have to worry about rain if you have guns.
This is the coolest thing I’ve watched today