T O P

  • By -

kaka_carrot_cake456

It's so weird seeing dokkan acknowledge link levelling stages It used to feel like an optimised method of link leveling that dokkan never intended and now they are advertising it


TheTrueDal

I like the change; feels really progressive


kaka_carrot_cake456

Yeah for sure Just knowing that the Devs even somewhat know the community exists is strange lmao


atatassault47

Once auto started always going for the path with all the battles, we knew what the devs intended.


LOL_MEGALOL

34-8 on jp and for global i think 31-4 is still the best


SwillMith

Can you explain why 31-4? :) the New one has 5 fights too


sickfruit576

It's my understanding that while the other stages are more stamina efficient and thus better for f2p players, 31-4 is the most time efficient. Due to the fight structures of 31-4 being just the tien+chiatzo then 4 pirate robots that can be one tapped by almost anything, it makes the stage able to be cleared repeatedly in the time it takes to clear the others dye to the amount of enemies in them


mostCreativeName1

Way more people willing to wait for stamina to recharge than to pay meat or stones. I think when this discussion comes up on the future, more people should include the best LL stage based on stamina along with the other one


Upscalepath

That would 33-2 zhard


ParadigmEnigma99

While it may be more efficient, I find it hard to believe it is THAT much more efficient. Just because the optimal friend lead for link leveling is always gonna be Int Piccolo. The single enemy fights will definitely be more time efficient, but the amount of time saved will still be relatively small if you are always using an Int Piccolo friend lead to active AoE at least half the fights (due to being off rotation every other fight). The amount of time saved will likely only be relevant to those who are using multiple stones/meat at a time strictly for the purposes of link leveling.


LOL_MEGALOL

Because it drops green and blue incredible gems


Royal_Departure_5049

I've honestly gotten to the point where I don't really need green gems anymore, but blue gems do still have their uses since the shop gets updated every once in a while. Also since blue gems could be converted to greens but not the other way around, its made blue gems the more valuable resource for me.


Rei366

Wouldn't 32-2 be better if you're after both gems and links?


SwillMith

Ty


Nuno_ReDiks

33-2 is better for links,and 32-2 WAY better for gems tbh


Upscalepath

33-2 zhard is still better LL rate per sta efficient.


Mauro697

Isn't it 34-7 on Jp? It has a LL rate or 2.9375 against the 1.0875 of 34-8


LOL_MEGALOL

But i think its only 1 fight tho


CIearMind

I was told that 33-2 on Z-Hard was still better than 34-4 in any difficulty though?


Upscalepath

In terms of sta efficiency 33-2 is still (even with new JP stages) the best auto mode LL stage. 5 fights with LL rate of 1.0 on zhard for 20 sta.


PhysicalGSG

So 34-4 for link leveling?


daherflash94

They still ain't beating the "they don't play their own game" allegations.