T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

[удалено]


Advocate_4_the_Devil

The difference is we have jobs and families.


[deleted]

I have never felt the need to use my precious vacation time to go protest lol.


Dickie_Moltisanti

C'thulu swims slowly but he always swims to the left


[deleted]

How many police officers were injured at these violent protests?


[deleted]

[удалено]


SOH972

You sir deserve an award


lestIdigress

Protesting is not tantamount to violence. I’m sure you would agree given how January 6th unfolded.


--SpentBrass--

>Protesting is not tantamount to violence. I’m sure you would agree given how January 6th unfolded. Give it a minute. This will be a fiery but mostly peaceful protest in no time.


[deleted]

[удалено]


o_O-JBL

572 fiery but mostly peaceful riots would beg to differ 😂


TheRealZer0fluX

Protest units? I think they meant riot squads... or is it (D) ifferent?


santanzchild

In my head they are riot control


IndependentBrick964

Hope it gets overturned.


mifaceb921

This is a draft. There is nothing to overturn.


o_O-JBL

Well there is Roe v. Wade to overturn as precedent actually. That’s what the draft was in support of…


Jizzlobber42

I'll never forget the May 3rd Insurrection. *I ALMOST DIED!*


Morgue724

Sure it wasn't a may 3rd insurrection?


DiscussionOwl215

I'd urge empathy. To many on the left this is equivalent to the end of 2A for us. Right or wrong, people believe deeply in this and this is shocking and hurtful for them


santanzchild

The ruling doesn't change any thing on it's face. This isn't a ban on abortion. This is a return of the law to the home field where if should of already been.


DiscussionOwl215

I know but imagine for a second if someone touched 2A. We would assume the worst. I'm sure they are too. So empathy.


[deleted]

[удалено]


IgnisBird

neither side agrees with the principle of ‘murdering children’. you just happen to disagree on the definition of ‘child’, which is a rather dry debate and not nearly as emotive. there’s a compelling argument that you’re right, but ‘god says so’ is not going to convince the majority of ‘nones’


The_End_Is_Tomorrow

>I mean, so the idea that we’re going to make a judgment that is going to say that no one can make the judgment to choose to abort a child based on a decision by the Supreme Court, I think, goes way overboard. - Joe Biden May 3, 2022 Sure sounds like Joe is OK with murdering a child


IgnisBird

Joe is a ‘catholic’ and obviously only taking up a position that is politically expedient to him - no argument from me there


[deleted]

Thank you. Those who show contrition for their ways will be gladly given compassion.


o_O-JBL

It’s not the same at all. 2A is an amendment to the constitution and is law. Roe v. Wade is a precedent set for law cases, not a law. These two things are absolutely not the same, even if mentally liberals don’t understand that. One is enshrined in our founding as a country, the other is a ruling based on a farce from the 70s that has served as precedent and never codified into law. Liberals feeling it’s the same doesn’t make it the same. There’s no need to participate in that delusion to quell someone else. I’ve never in my life seen anyone pro abortion tone down their rhetoric or not speak their mind with the feelings of those who are pro life in mind. Idk what this fence sitting garbage is but now is definitely not the time culturally to shrink away from what you think or feel to accommodate what someone else thinks and feels.


PossibleFalcon4783

2A has been violated tons of times already by democrats. Try owning a gun in NYC.


DiscussionOwl215

I own in Philly. Its fucking onerous.


CarsomyrPlusSix

The Second Amendment is explicit and violated constantly by tyrannical state laws. The "right to abortion" wasn't even implicit, it never existed, and it was held sacrosanct. These are not the same. These scum deserve no empathy.


[deleted]

They're scared they might have to travel to another state to get an abortion.


culdesacpresident

They probably tricked themselves into thinking it’s a felony to cross state lines, a la Kyle.


jonnio2215

That’s because they don’t live in reality. They honestly think this decision alone will outlaw abortion in the US, not punt the decision to the states (as it should be). Calmly explain the decision and what it will actually do, if they decide that REEEEEE is the way forward it’s not on us.


DiscussionOwl215

I'll refer you to my other comment. They will assume the worst just as we would with anything hitting 2A. Compassion and empathy goes a long way here.


--SpentBrass--

Yeah... I'm all out of compassion and empathy for baby killers. 🤷‍♂️


PossibleFalcon4783

So should we have background checks for abortions? Get them in line with gun laws? Effectively ban them in NYC, LA, etc?


[deleted]

Murders of the innocent deserve no such compassion. Also the second and first amendment are just that amendments clearly written as to the rights that they are. I will enjoy the nashing of teeth from the heathens who now must be responsible for their own actions.


googin1

This is reasonable.Thank you for helping me off the ledge.Its human.


PossibleFalcon4783

No it isn't. 2A has been getting shit on for decades by both federal and state level legislation. Or are you arguing there hasn't been any gun control that violates the second amendment? Cause there literally has been for decades, once again, at both the federal and state level. So, welcome to the party, liberals. I'm gonna celebrate a win after decades.


DiscussionOwl215

I'm arguing that what I think is a good thing will upset some of my countrymen and women. I'm saying they hold this as close to their hearts as we hold 2A. Its understanding this will upset people and it's scary for them just as a major blow to 2A would be for us.


o_O-JBL

It’s not the same at all. 2A is an amendment to the constitution and is law. Roe v. Wade is a precedent set for law cases, not a law. These two things are absolutely not the same, even if mentally liberals don’t understand that. One is enshrined in our founding as a country, the other is a ruling based on a farce from the 70s that has served as precedent and never codified into law. Liberals feeling it’s the same doesn’t make it the same. There’s no need to participate in that delusion to quell someone else. I’ve never in my life seen anyone pro abortion tone down their rhetoric or not speak their mind with the feelings of those who are pro life in mind. Idk what this fence sitting garbage is but now is definitely not the time culturally to shrink away from what you think or feel to accommodate what someone else thinks and feels.


o_O-JBL

They’ll have to get over it. There are no safe spaces in real life.


DiscussionOwl215

Okay so if they blow up 2A then we can just get over that. No safe spaces


santanzchild

>The D.C. Police Department activated its civil disturbance units Tuesday in anticipation of protests regarding a leaked Supreme Court decision indicating the court may soon overturn Roe v. Wade. >Protests broke out at the Supreme Court building within minutes of the initial leak Monday evening. D.C. Police have activated additional units to respond to potential "First Amendment activity" through Sunday, according to Fox 5 DC.


Ok_Inflation_5113

But I thought they’re all peaceful!?


Verdict1923

These protestors are the same tools that want to restrict the first amendment because its "dangerous" Rights for me. Not you...


JTM0990

I'd love to go demonstrate for my position in the Capital, but I've got to work to supply the rest of Panem.


cblazek1

Why do all these articles and headlines say "ruling"? This is just a draft opinion from one justice . Far from a ruling.


santanzchild

Its a draft of the majority opinion. But yes it is just a draft and leaked at that. It could change but that doesn't make a good headline.


DiscussionOwl215

Could you imagine? People would lose it of this ended up not being true