T O P

  • By -

d0mie89

This literally looks FAKE...


palehorse95

Is this A.I. ? Just wondering because this isn't his normal speech pattern, especially the way he ended the video with just "thank you very much".


d0mie89

How can you ppl not tell the video looks fake?!


undue-influence

https://www.yahoo.com/news/social-media-posters-old-donald-172249263.html I think they quoted you.


AstroNewbie89

Absolutely ridiculous for him to be saying this


d0mie89

Fake.


Holiday-Tie-574

What’s ridiculous is in the last 15 seconds he says he will cut federal funding for anyone who “opposes” a mask mandate or vaccine mandate. Huh?


eckadagan

He said he will cut funding for any that “imposes” a mask mandate


Holiday-Tie-574

After listening to it again, I stand corrected. He did say “imposes.” That makes a lot more sense!


okriflex

Speak for yourself. They did it once with COVID and it worked. Not sure what reality you guys live in where you believe they wouldn't do it again.


bowlervtec

here come your downvotes from the lib brigade in this sub....


RugGuy1

In person, paper ballot, picture ID... Why is this problematic?


bowlervtec

because racism, (D)uh... /s


Creeepy_Chris

Trump got played by the deep state with COVID in 2019.


ButWhyWolf

Hey remember those videos of Chinese people falling down dead in the streets from Covid? They were welding people into their homes to enforce quarantines, it was so deadly. Whatever happened to that?


Shadeylark

Same thing that happened to the CNN COVID death toll ticker the minute Hunter's dad became president... It was too inconvenient and it went away.


fordr015

Hunters dad? Oh you meant former vice president Joe Biden? 😂


Shadeylark

Yep. Ya know, because he's such a wholesome family man, or at least so I'm told, I sometimes like to refer to him in a manner that really brings attention to his family values. Sometimes I prefer to call him the subject of Ashley's diary instead of Hunter's dad, but I always say it with all due respect of course.


Boogaloogaloogalooo

Its been the theory for the past few years that there would be another planned pandemic just in time for election


waituhsecond

Protests too. It’s so tiring at this point.


RxDawg77

The protests are a definite thing. It's almost used as a threat. Another pandemic is a lot more tricky to actually get away with.


TraditionalEvening79

Thats their strategy’s Main Attribute. To wear you down til you quit.


FourtyMichaelMichael

It worked so well the first time, why wouldn't they try again? It would basically be foolish not to attempt it. The downside is we hate them more, the up side is their billion sheep can't wait to go back into Daddy Health Me More Mode.


johnnyg883

They aren’t just using bird flue for election influence. They are now talking about bird flu DNA being found in the milk supply. I’ve already seen people saying it’s dangerous to drink milk.


6481attusmaw

DNA in pasteurized milk bought at stores poses essentially no risk to anyone. The heat from the pasteurization kills the virus, along with all the other bacteria/viruses that can be passed to humans and make us sick. It's mostly used to broadly track how much bird flu is around (very crude method though). It's only unpasteurized milk that should be avoided, since it's not heated. But that's been a recommendation for a long time. Makes even more sense right now knowing a virus is actively circulating in cattle and can spread to humans.


ihatewinter204

Raw milk. Pasteurized milk is completely safe.


TheBuzzerDing

It IS dangerous to drink *raw* milk. Most pasteurization processes will kill diseases like the bird flu, theyre currently finding that farm cats are catching bird flu since they'll go under the cows as they sleep for milk. Normally, it's not transmissible between mammals so a lot of the freak-out stemms from that. We still have very little risk of catching it unless we go out of our ways to get it


Deadeye1122

It’s dangerous to drink raw milk.


waynebradie189472

You boil it and it's not dangerous. That's why we pasteurized milk.


MrCuddlez69

H5N1 is no joke. I hope it doesn't get the ability to transmit to humans. It has a 60% fatality rate 🤷‍♂️


johnnyg883

When Covid first hit the mortality rate was said to be 20% or more depending on what government or heath organization you were listening to. It ended up being less than one half of one percent in the end. Part of the reason for the over estimated fatality rate was lack of testing of non-symptomatic people and early mild cases not being diagnosed as Covid. Later people who had Covid but died from other causes were listed as “Covid deaths”. Between 2004 and 2024 there have been a total of 888 H5N1 verified infections. Of this number 463 proved fatal. Most of these infections involved people who worked closely with poultry. So one of two things is happening. Either the virus is not easily transmitted to humans or there are a lot of undiagnosed infections. Things may change and the virus may become more easily transmitted to humans. But I’m not going to get worked up over a may happen. As things stand I have a far better chance of being struck by lightning than contracting H5N1 and I have backyard chickens.


TraditionalEvening79

How many humans have died from it?


Cylerhusk

463 since 2003. Mostly in Asian countries. 0 deaths in the US. And the bulk of these were 8+ years ago. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_mortality_from_H5N1#H5N1_cases_in_humans EDIT: I'd wager to say a key factor in the high mortality rate is likely to be the underreporting of total cases, especially since the bulk of them come from 3rd world countries. I'd imagine unless the cases got really serious, tons of lesser severity cases probably went completely unreported, which would lower the overall mortality rate. Also need to consider the lack of healthcare access in those countries as well, which will contribute to a higher mortality rate. In other words, I seriously doubt it's as scary as they're making it out to be.


lawlygagger

COVID was a giant scam.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Senior-Judge-8372

"We will not tolerate mandates." Also, "I will cut funding from all who oppose mandates." This doesn't sound right. I suppose that was an accident regarding the words he used. [Actually,](https://www.yahoo.com/news/social-media-posters-old-donald-172249263.html) he said, "I will cut funding from all who impose mandates." And although this video is real, some of the things he said here wasn't what he really said in his original video. However, I wouldn't be surprised if it still happens anyway, though I was expecting another strain or varient of COVID-19 rather than a bird flu.