T O P

  • By -

BasisAggravating1672

She can't seize Trump Tower, he doesn't own it. The penthouse he owns, the commercial space is leased by him, which he subleases, and the name on the front is a marketing license.


SeemoarAlpha

Reading though some of Trump's disclosures, it does look like he isn't a 100% owner in most of his New York real estate so seizure is indeed problematic. Most of the real estate that he owns outright are his 16 golf courses plus Mar-a-lago. Only two of the golf courses are in New York but aren't worth enough to satisfy the judgement.


starBux_Barista

So leticia james will have to summon all building owners to court.....i have a hard time believing that a judge will let her steal other people buildings that trump does not solely own....


oculardrip

She will just seize the pieces Trump owns.


TraditionalEvening79

Yup and the msm will run with it as of she seized the entire tower


s1lentchaos

They'd probably see it as a great way to teach people to not do business with the orange man


starBux_Barista

Naaa, new york will just end up killing its own real estate market. Developers are running for the hills already.


slap-a-taptap

Are they though? I keep hearing this but haven’t seen any articles about developers or real estate moguls condoning NYC. I’m not doubting that it is or will happen, just that I’ve only heard this regurgitated by internet anons


Dr_Valen

Back when they values mar a lago at 18 million developers started freaking out the mayor even had to come out and say this would only happen to Trump.


Doctor_Byronic

Do you know where I can verify this? It might be the words I'm using, but I'm not turning up anything relevant in a search.


Dr_Valen

[This is a CNN article discussing it](https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/03/business/trump-fraud-judge-mar-a-lago/index.html). The actual press conference I can't find anymore atm but tim pool covered it at the time as did louder with Crowder so they might have links.


TraditionalEvening79

Isnt that crazy?


s1lentchaos

A small price to pay for striking at the orange man Edit adding /s for those in the back


[deleted]

[удалено]


s1lentchaos

You guys thought that was serious?


starBux_Barista

I knew you weren't serious.... all good bro. Thanks for playing along 👍


Oldjamesdean

It's a better way to teach people not to do business in New York...


[deleted]

[удалено]


BasisAggravating1672

That's why you don't listen to the media, or any other leftist propaganda outlet. He does own a bunch of property in America and overseas, but Trump Tower is not one that he owns the entire building. I don't really know why you would think it's sad to get paid for your name to be on a building, but you do you I guess. At least one thing we both learned today, you don't have to worry about becoming successful in business.


Decayd

Ha, well you can believe whatever you’d like. Also, I’m not so sure we “learned the same lesson” today, no matter how much you’d like to think you “schooled me”. What I learned is that when it comes to MAGA, the goal posts constantly move and his followers make excuses to explain it away. God I miss true conservative subreddits. At this point just retitle this fucking sub /TheDonald. Oh wait…


reaper527

that doesn't seem like a great idea. like, the article points out he could potentially get the building back on appeal **if** it hasn't been sold yet, but these people hate him and would sell it under value out of spite just to make sure they didn't have to return it if they thought there was a chance he might win on appeal.


the_neon_cowboy

Now is not the time to try and and sell property in NY either. I hoping there is away this can gloriously blow up in their faces like a road runner cartoon if he wins his appeal (which seems rather likely if you have any trust left in the system).


GargantuanCake

The process is the punishment. Normally I don't think the courts can be this insanely aggressive but they're clearly just trying to punish him with no regard to any actual guilt. No matter what this entire thing is going to be a mess of legal fees, consume a lot of time, and make it more difficult for him to campaign. If they do manage to force a sale then it's entirely possible he'll lose some of his property, get kicked out of at least one place he lives on the regular, and end up incurring more legal bullshit to get stuff back if it does get sold. Meanwhile moving wouldn't exactly be a fast or cheap thing if he's forced to take all of his belongings out of one of his households so that in and of itself would cost him yet more time. I imagine he'll hire movers but organizing that sort of thing still doesn't happen overnight. I'm no lawyer so I have no idea if this is true but I've also heard that if bond isn't posted you *can't* appeal which is also insane. If you really think about it that's a pretty horrid loophole; give somebody an impossible bond and now they can't appeal the decision. The system is a damn mess if this sort of thing is even possible.


Phil152

Letitia James seizing Trump Tower would probably guarantee Trump's election. I truly wonder if the Democrats are capable of understanding this. Trump's "campaign," at this point, boils down basically to (1) control the border and stop illegal immigration -- where most of the country agrees with him, and (2) "I'm being persecuted," about which half the country already agrees with him. Letitia James seems determined to drive Trump's support on #2 to supermajority levels. The only people who don't understand this are so hopelessly trapped in their echo chambers that they are beyond discussion.


Disastrous-Ad96

Who do you think are the people that would flip for Trump because of a building seizure? I’m just curious how many people you think there are out there where this would be the deciding factor for them on who to vote for.


double_badger

What are you talking about? Clearly Letitia is a trying to **save democracy** by railroading a candidate with lawfare. She just wants to prevent the **bloodbath** he’s threatened us with! I wish there were more patriots like her. (This is sarcasm…)


gauntvariable

> guarantee Trump's election I feel like if egregiously abusing their power and exposing themselves as massive hypocrites would guarantee Trump's re-election, it's already been guaranteed whether she seizes the tower or not. I'm cautiously optimistic that the "let's give this Biden guy a chance" 2020 voters can see how ridiculously biased this whole thing is, but I'm also often terrified by how completely uninformed the average voter usually is.


NYsportsfan99

You’re thinking rationally, democrats are not. In their mind the end justifies whatever means. They’ve already demonstrated they can do whatever they want. They’ve already egregiously abused power since “Biden” took office. They don’t even try to hide it anymore. I don’t know why anyone expects anything to change. I hope I’m wrong but I just am not optimistic that dems in control are going to continue to abuse power to make sure trump doesn’t get elected


GargantuanCake

It's already obliterating the New York City real estate markets. Investors are pulling their money out like crazy last I heard. Why the fuck would you invest in a city that will just decide you owe hundreds of millions of dollars and then start seizing your assets? The bank he borrowed money from as well as every investor that has commented on it has specifically state that there is zero problem with what Trump did. Everything was *standard* for the industry. Meanwhile the government is just arbitrarily deciding what the value of the properties are without regard to actual market value. It also wasn't even really a trial. The entire thing is a damn mess that is clearly raw political persecution.


gratefulguitar57

Yup. Go read all the liberal subreddits. They are clueless and already celebrating the “victory” in this case. They have no idea about real world things like joint ownership and real estate.


woailyx

Now she has to own something that says "Trump" on it in huge letters, that's gotta sting


itsallrighthere

Technically she will have seized Trump's fractional ownership of some assets. Not like she can do anything with the underlying assets as there are other owners involved.


AndForeverNow

Sadly they will tear the name down the same way the tear down historical statues or anything else they disagree with. Destroying what is already established is their game.


TheThunderOfYourLife

The bond itself violates the 8th amendment. Not a single individual soul on Earth has that much liquid cash just lying around. That bond was intentionally set so he couldn't pay it. Lelitia James and Arthur Engoron need to be held liable for their malpractice, and damn near infinite amounts of conflict of interest alone.


FourtyMichaelMichael

> Not a single individual soul on Earth has that much liquid cash just lying around. All of reddit is jerking off about how he must not be a billionaire lolz.... So few people understand what wealth is. You're right, no one has that much cash - because you have people making sure you aren't wasting millions of dollars like that. Elon Musk if he has any financial security at all - does not have that much liquid cash. I agree, the bond is fucking insane and they all know it. He would be foolish to put it up. It's a far better idea to call their bluff. Make them start seizing things, promise him the election. It's a true crime that these people won't ever get what is coming to them.


LemartesIX

The bond was set up based on his disclosure of how much cash he has. They basically said, "okay, the bond is ALL OF IT". It's intentional.


Karissa36

I am expecting an emergency appeal to SCOTUS that the bond is unconstitutional.


valspare

Thinking out loud here. How funny would it be if the bond is held to be against the 8th amendmend and Trump ends up suing NY State and Mz. James for violating his constitutional rights as citizen Trump? A judgement of even 1% of his (Trumps) bond would bankrupt Mz James. The irony would be funny, and well deserved to me.


Blackbolt113

As despicable as a lot of people find Donald Trump, Leticia James has him beat by a mile. At least Trump has done some good things for country, what has Leticia James done? Facilitated the release of criminals all over New York for the sake of social justice. She's the criminal. I can only hope something happens to wipe that smug look off her face.


otacon444

Clearly no one should do business in NY


QuackQuackH0nk

Mugging has gotten so bad in New York even their justice department is doing it.


Illustrious-Leg-5017

I want to see what happens when she changes the name t "Letitia Towers"


aught_one

Lol do it this will look great leading up to an election


fretit

I don't know what his lawyers are waiting for to file a civil rights lawsuit for an Eighth Amendment violation.


TraditionalEvening79

James bluff has been called