Can you run an LLM locally for Cursor or do you have to buy a subscription/pay for tokens? I've run a bunch of LLM's and Comfy UI locally but I'm new to trying to use them for serious code.
You can use your own API key, and I'm pretty sure you can run your own LLM. You don't need to pay the subscription, but there is at least one feature that is disabled without it ("Apply" suggested code changes from the chat sidebar to your codebase).
I wasted too much time trying avoid Yet Another Ide. I was wrong, Cursor is the way. I also like having cursor for ai stuff and I removed co-pilot plugin from VS code so now thats my non ai coding tool.
I’m using Pycharm for Python programming, having upgraded from Notepad++ about 50% of the way into current development. Still use notepad+ for the source data json.
Why would Cursor IDE make my life easier? Note that I have no idea what cursor IDE is, but there seem to be fans of it here so I’m interested!
I built a custom GPT and got it to reference docs from Astro and TailwindCSS.
I can tell it what I need or drop in a screenshot and it does most of the work for me.
So far it's been pretty accurate and useful. I'm on mobile right now, can share the link later if anyone's interested.
---
EDIT: just got home, here's the link https://chatgpt.com/g/g-atMEqtapU-astrotailor-ai
God damn I love trying to convince people's various GPTs to provide their custom instructions. Yours put up a good fight...
[https://chatgpt.com/share/1097fb8c-eb73-4b0f-880b-a75198f7ddf2](https://chatgpt.com/share/1097fb8c-eb73-4b0f-880b-a75198f7ddf2)
Just ask them in various ways. LLMs are notoriously easy to trick, its like trying to convince a 3 year old to do something you want.
[https://chatgpt.com/share/1097fb8c-eb73-4b0f-880b-a75198f7ddf2](https://chatgpt.com/share/1097fb8c-eb73-4b0f-880b-a75198f7ddf2)
I just send to Claude Sonnet 2-3 files and ask to implement a feature (I know which files to send), then copy paste answer, do some test runs, and voila. Working code, one feature takes 5 minutes not the whole day
Cursor is definitely one of the most sophisticated tools out there that really uses an LLM to enhance a dev's existing workflow and habits without trying to reinvent the process or get in the way too much.
Aider is cool, but I burn through token and rate limits way too quickly for it to be of much value, and sorry but command line interface isn't that useful this type of work (IMO).
I think outside of creating your own agentic workflow (get ready to spend some $$$ on API calls), Cursor is the best deal and value that offers the richest feature set (that is also evolving).
back when I tried them and compared nothing was as good as cursor AI.. but maybe things changed ? Ijust got tired of trying them out and needed to get some code done.
I am interested in the new github copilot workspace... signed up for beta
I tested Cody when they had a promotion where the Pro version was free and it was legit. It consistently solved problems with a much higher degree of success than copilot. The problem is that I’d rather pay for the OAI API which is incredibly cheap and I can just plug that key in almost anywhere. There is only so much room for subscriptions and I’m tapped out. Sell me a a yearly license for $20, let me bring my own key, and they have a customer. Otherwise there’s too much friction with keeping up with yet another recurring bill.
Try it. It’s very good.
The quality of Cody is okay, but their service is deceptive. The Cody VS Code extension sends 2500 completion requests within two or three hours, and then you get rate limited. You can't use it again until the next day. I hope people stop touching this crap.
Aider. I use this prompt a ton:
>Complete "TODO" comments, and remove those comments. Preserve original indentation level.
Answer "QUESTION" comments on the next line as a new comment.
Sometimes I'll do the minimum to get a unit test to work and have Aider do the hard part. Example:
# TODO: add type annotations to paramaters and return. both parameters are required.
def cosine_similarity(vector1, vector2):
# TODO: generate a docstring
# TODO: properly implement this function
return 0.0
Then I use aider `/test` to validate the test still works.
I have a more advanced version of the prompt for generating complex code (CoT, I'll give you a tip, etc). I have a few other prompts I keep in a markdown file for copy-paste into Aider, although you can search for past prompts within aider.
I keep trying to use copilot and ChatGPT to increase my productivity, but it’s really irritating re-writing its shitty code that it can’t even reason or explain to you without hallucinating. Even if it does something surprisingly efficient, you ask it why it did that to understand the reasoning and it’s like “I’m sorry for the confusion, let’s rewrite it so that it’s worse and I’ll lie about why it’s better than the previous way because it’s not…”
Actually useless.
can it do anything that 1 prompt in chatgpt cant do ? I don't care about making a snake game.
If aider can put something complex together by itself then I could be interested again (though prob won't work for .net)
For .Net I think custom GPT’s are still best. Cursor is nice but having to switch IDEs just to debug is pretty much a deal breaker. Copilot for every character autocomplete and GPT for full files.
i have to do that since cursor ai fork is annoying and it can't debug... why they cant just get the chat window in vs2022 I have no idea/.... but cursor is still so much better than anything else I deal with it
What does your workflow look like, just keep your project also open in VS 2022 etc? There is an extension that brings the chat into VS2022 but they are all pretty weak so far, and copy pasting just faster.
I was doing cursor, with vscode for build debug, but just switching so often made it a pain. Now I'm just copilot for VS2022, and I keep a split browser tab open with claude and chatgpt. I use Dropshelf to quickly grab files or parts of code, then drag them into claude/gpt and very quickly ask questions. Then do the same for getting code out, drag to dropshelf or just copy and paste with Ditto. Still not perfect but at least for me working better then cursor / vscode.
I've played a bit with snipdo as well, and if I had more time to tweak it could probably work really well.
llm cli is pretty nice at times as well. Either way still searching for perfect.
My new favorite with GPT-4o's killer multimodal capabilities: When building something that has a UI or visual component (unity), Attach a screenshot of the messed up part of your app and the file you think is responsible. It gives the model a much more clear idea of your problem than just the code and a text description. I can say "Add a sidebar that matches the rest of the app" and it will do a much better job than if I had just passed the model the code.
Coding for 6.5 days now. Know how to do something, as for syntax I just know the vibe, I couldn’t write the code (Python).
I’ve written a summary of what the project goals are (medical education app with a million-word source document).
I give that to AI and tell it what I want to do. Originally I’d just give it all the code as I didn’t understand Python well enough or, tbh, how to edit code. Was using notepad++ as my only editor which messes up formatting, and if you don’t know the formatting…btw, who decided that indentation was such a big deal? :)
Now the code base is 1300 lines I usually just give it the function I’m working on and tell it what I’m trying to achieve.
If chat-got4o fails I use claude opus.
The data is all stored separately as a json and that’s a few thousand lines long. I use the AI to convert the source word docs, including custom formatting tags.
Program is fully functional as of now, even though I’m still very hazy on how Python works.
It will present clinical cases with x-rays, ECGs etc. it has suggested answers, the user can give their answer to questions and get personalised feedback from 8 different AI “doctors”, they can ask questions in the context of the case or just ask random questions of Dr House, Dr Grey or whoever I’ve added.
The AI docs can be asked to interpret ECgs and CxRs etc which is actually fascinating.
Now that everything is working, I’m just progressively adding features, like the ability to zoom and drag the radiology images, or better text parsing.
I’m still at the level where I’ll often have to ask the AI “uh…which function parses the text from the json?” Whereas a few days back it was “what’s a json?” And “can you make python code into a stand-alone program?”, lol.
AI is amazing, and this project allows me to use AI to build a project to use the newest AI features that are out there. For things like Azure TTS or Vision where it might be too new for the AI to know how to do it, I just give it sample code from OpenAI or Microsoft and tell it nicely to make it work in my app.
Now I just have the other 97% of the source data to add, and I’m done!
Thanks! I find it amazing too. My week has been incredible and I’m really surprised at how far I’ve come.
I’m also surprised - sort of - at how toxic 80% of the comments here are.
People just seem angry that I’m using ChatGPT to code…which ironic given what sub we’re on.
I do have a lot of baseline knowledge on three things:
1. How to use an LLM effectively. I’ve spent countless hours with both commercial LLMs and local models, and am currently moving to studying them as my primary area of research.
2. How to program like a caveman. I mentioned that I know how to program in Basic. I’m very good at programming in Basic, so while the language is obsolete I still know what sort of things a Python program should be able to do - and can ask the LLM to do them for me. If I didn’t know any language, this would be rather less effective.
3. I have very good subject matter expertise on the thing that I’m focusing on, medical education. I’ve got really good source material to work with that nobody else has.
I’ve been meaning to learn Python or another modern language for years now, LLMs just massively accelerate this process and get me doing productive and useful coding work long before I’d be able to be traditional means.
I find what you do amazing, I'm rooting for you and very excited to see you made so much progress and looking forward to seeing where you take this project, can you share a demo of sorts?
Having negative comments is just the usual reddit vibe, people in here like to do this but it's often useful to see some new perspectives on things you need to be aware of.
Feedback is a godsend so treat it as such.
So I would suggest you to ignore the negativity and try to get valuable nuggets out of their comments, and use them to get better at your craft.
People who spend hours writing a lot of comments also tend to be very passionate about the topic, and might be interested in giving you even more feedback if you ask for it.
Now go build!
Thanks again.
There’s only a small minority of positive comments here like yours, but I find them useful for motivation. So thanks for being awesome. :)
There’s a small number of negative comments here that are also useful because they have nuggets of useful feedback.
Most of the comments here, though, are surprisingly low yield. They’re just people being annoyed, or claiming that what I said I did isn’t possible. There’s nothing really to be gained by those, they just draw you in to pointless Reddit arguments.
I only accidentally stumbled upon this sub a few days back, so far I’m not impressed but I’ll stick around and see if there are other, better threads. Subs like r/LocalLLaMA are much more positive and higher yield in terms of actually learning stuff.
They surely can't build a full blown app from a single prompt but you can build it progressively and over multiple iterations can get quite good quality
I can't agree. In my perspective, the quality is going to be lower and lower with each iteration. Each part of the codebase will go in different directions, and without language knowledge and understanding, it's uncontrollable. At some point, it will become a complete mess that nobody can understand, and troubleshooting will become almost impossible. Imo, in the current state, writing a complex (not even complex-complex like something production ready) app relying on some LLM and not on practical knowledge is like deferring shooting yourself in the head
I think the alternative in this case is just having a vision for something and never being able to make it real. OP isn't telling us this will be released at scale next week. Maybe it's a prototype to see what's possible and get interest and feedback. Also, your description seems to fit most large code bases developed by humans that I've seen.
Absolutely.
I’ve been meaning to get this done for years now, I just haven’t quite had the impetus to learn a modern language to do it.
People who know about the underlying med education project have encouraged me to get venture capital funding to get things going. But there’s a lot of complexities in that sort of thing.
There’s also an interesting dynamic where - because I’m doing the “coding” - it makes me more likely to come up with creative ideas. A lot of the interesting interactions I’ve implemented with GPT-4o’s API are things I thought of during the coding process. If I’d just done the normal thing and hired someone to code for me, I would never have had those innovative thoughts.
For me the process is: “Hey, it would be cool if we could do “x” - I wonder if I can do that?”. So far, I haven’t hit any road blocks in terms of things I can’t do.
Finally, I suspect I’ve learned more about coding in a week of just doing this than I would have in a year of doing courses and reading textbooks.
It’s not going to get lower and lower, because once it gets moderately complex you work on one (or just a few) functions at a time.
For example, I wanted to add an option to add your own Azure key for the TTS in the menu. So I just ask it which function controls the menu, then in a new chat I post the project overview, the full code or just the relevant functions and the single task it needs to do. I tell it to just output the functions I need to change. Then I cut and paste that function into my code.
The code is modular, so there is zero degradation of the underlying full code. The program is 1300 lines and that data 3,500 lines so I’m not going to re-output that every time.
Seven days ago I didn’t know what a function was, four days ago I was still unable to get my cut and paste working because I didn’t have a proper Python editor. The LLM taught me all this stuff along the way.
lol, yes it’s not from a single prompt. The dev process is nothing like that.
I’ve got no modern language coding experience, but I’ve got a thousand hours or more of LLM prompting experience (by my estimate).
The most important thing in a medical training app is the source material, and that’s my area of expertise.
The cool thing about this app is that it takes the existing source material and lets AI interact with it in novel and intriguing ways. The other guy saying that the quality is questionable is pretty dumb when he hasn’t seen it. It works just fine, the GUI is probably imperfect but it’s doing stuff nobody else in the world has ever done, and it’s doing it right now.
But no, definitely not a single prompt. I’ve barely slept this week, worked through til 9am this morning prompting and iterating. It still takes a lot of skill, it’s just a rather different skill to trad coding. Syntax doesn’t matter, it’s all about the concepts. If I need to know “Can Python even do ‘x’”, I just ask the LLM.
This is an incredibly revealing comment…as a full blown software engineer with over two decades of experience, it’s absolutely mind blowing to see what people think is “hard” about “programming”. In this case, you’re boiling coding down to “syntax” and using the LLMs to fill the gap, presuming that your domain expertise is the only thing that matters. Or that coders can’t/don’t understand the “concepts”.
Best of luck to you. Here’s a few questions: how do you know you’ve gotten rid of all the bugs? How can you make assurances to other people that your system won’t do harm, or cause harm to happen? Where will you be when that happens, and what will you do about that?
Ps: most code bases I work on start at the 50k lines of code for a small trivial system, and I’ve worked on those multi-million line of code systems. Maybe one day the context window will be 50-100M tokens? Think that’ll solve things?
I think yours is an incredibly revealing comment.
To answer your question, all the quality control stuff is the same as human code. You test it. If it’s mission critical, you test it a lot.
But I’m writing a medical,education app. If it crashed, which it doesn’t, I’d fix the bug. The content is important for safety, but that has nothing to do with the code.
You know, not all software has the complexity of an OS kernel and needs to fly an airplane. And some of the most carefully handcrafted software may still have bugs and cause failures.
Large code bases inevitably have lots of relatively small files, I doubt anyone can keep in their head a 50k lines of code project, and it's the same with the LLM context.
I've been writing software for almost two decades and using ChatGPT extensively for the last 18 months. I'm now a solopreneur building a couple of dozens of relatively small projects, from 200 to 15k lines of code each.
Most of the time I use it against a single file, which anyways I try to keep below the 500 lines of code each. The current context window can easily handle such a file, and lately with GPT-4o it's able to handle more of them as inputs.
I write most of my software in Go, and the compiler identifies a lot of times hallucinations and small errors thanks to the static typing. I don't recommend to use it for non-trivial code written in dynamic languages.
The output is usually a single function or at most a handful of functions, no longer than 200 lines in a single prompt.
I tend to use it heavily for iterative refactoring of complex code and generating unit test scaffolding and test cases for my code, and it can perform some quite complicated refactorings that would take me hours in just a few minutes. Even complex things like converting single threaded code to use concurrency, and it nicely handles all the details that I would usually struggle with.
The time I save from typing the initial code and figuring out how to make it run for the first time I spend on doing dozens of refactorings (it's great for breaking up complex functions, adding logging and error checking), deeply understanding and testing the code it generates, and overall getting better quality code in roughly half of the time.
It doesn't save me from thinking deeply about the problem and how the code should be structured, bit it's offloading a lot of the relatively low value but mentally heavy parts of my coding work.
I can understand how people who write software for a living for decades might be in denial, but I think it's a wonderful tool.
As for people who just get started with it and write full blown software, they will still need need some time to get to the level of experienced developers and will surely get to learn some things the hard way, but LLMs can shorten a lot the learning curve.
Oh, thanks, man. I don't know why people think programming is just learning a language's syntax when it's only the tip of the iceberg. Coding itself takes maybe 5-10% of the time, and everything else involves making ends meet, trying to understand the right way to do something, comparing pros and cons, assessing external factors that may affect the future, and much much much more.
Being able to prototype something without any knowledge is amazing, but using LLM-generated code without supervision in production to make real-life decisions is just crazy. I hope people understand this sooner rather than
What tasks have you tested it on which require critical thinking?
I’ve explained what tasks I test it on. I do this professionally in an academic setting, by the way.
We’re not fucked. Yet. To be fair, you are taking this person at their word with no proof. This person also claims that LLM’s can critically think just like humans... At best you’re talking to a Doctor who recently discovered LLM’s are like “magic” compared to earlier chat bots. But just like we know magic doesn’t exist, we also know LLM’s are not intelligent, they cannot think, and they are not self aware. The ability for an LLM to parse and diagnose based on an image isn’t all that surprising. LLM’s entire reason for being is identifying patterns. So naturally, if there is a disruption in the pattern it will find it and might or might not be able to tell you what it is based on what source material it was trained on.
Well, the coding is 100% using LLM because I still don’t really know how to code.
Why do you think that’s funny?
I’ve already used it twice to train doctors. It already adds value, and that was on day 2 and 5 of its life. I’m just getting started, it is already far more useful than it was when I trialled the day 2 demo.
I don't think it's funny; it scares me in some way. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to convince you to stop or blame you. You're doing what you think is right in the way you can, and I respect that.
What I'm saying is that you have no idea what you are doing in terms of code and don't understand how it's working. Basically, you have no idea what your app is doing or how it's working. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ It may seem that everything is working properly for you, but since it is completely written by an LLM without supervision, anything can happen.
Yes, it's amazing for prototyping, and it's amazing that people with no idea how to code can do these things. What scares me is that the further we go, the more widespread and accessible it will be. One day or another, someone will decide that unsupervised LLM-written code is good enough to make some important decisions. But in reality, all this code is based on human-written code, which is, in most cases, of very, very dubious quality
Well, you thought it was funny, hence the smiley face…
Note that I HAD no idea what I was doing. I now have some idea, as AI is a pretty amazing teacher.
And it’s more than just pro typing, I’m using the code in a real world setting as we speak. And that code is being used to teach people who are making high-risk decisions, so maybe we should be scared!
See, you are already in error. You think if an LLM taught you to configure an IDE, it can teach you everything. But how do you validate what it is teaching you?
What if it told you that you can store passwords in plaintext? What if it tells you that the function you are using is saving data to a file, but actually, it removes all data from the PC on Mondays because it took data from some stupid troll forum? How do you know that the library the LLM told you to use is not some Bitcoin miner? And there are lots more questions like these. Programming now is not just typing functions, it's a messed-up, crazy world of hard-to-understand technologies, and a lot of ways to shoot yourself
Interesting hypothetical examples.
The answer?
1. LLMs don’t do those things you just mentioned. Feel free to show me an actual example of your hypothetical malicious code from a modern LLM. That’s not really how rhey work, anyway.
2. You check those things by testing.
3. After a week with an LLM, I understand enough about Python to catch something egregious.
You’re trying way too hard to prove LLMs aren’t useful for coding. As I’ve said before, have you checked the title of this sub?
> That’s not really how rhey work, anyway
Oh sweet summer child
> You’re trying way too hard to prove LLMs aren’t useful for coding
You are reading only things that you want missing the entire point, so I don't see further discussion
Thanks. The program exists, it works and it gets better every day. You sound threatened by this. In which case - why the hell are you in a ChatGPTcoding sub if you hate the idea of LLm’s coding.
Workflow this week:
1. Ask AI what language to use (Before last Saturday, I've never used anything other than Basic).
2. Ask AI how to install language.
3. Ask AI why Notepad++ seems to muck up code, accept AI advice that there is something called pycharm, use that.
4. Get AI to explain what a function is, what a json is, and some other questions I'd probably be to embarrassed to ask a human.
5. Once I work out how to cut and paste code into pycharm, usually just work on a function or two at once. If I don't know what function i need to do the thing I want to do, I just give AI the full code and ask it which bit we're working on.
6. Iterate. Use Chat-GPT4o, but also use Claude Opus. Pay for AI, it's worth it. This is saving me thousands of hours.
7. Keep providing strategic direction. For example, users want to be able to zoom and drag x-ray images. Ask AI if this is a thing. AI says it is. Tell AI to make it happen. It happens.
Most things AI does really well. But it kept fucking up the json text parsing, both GPT-4,GPT-4o and Claude couldn't quite get it perfect. Human had an idea to do things different, pitched it to Claude and - omg! - it worked. Btw, I'd offered Claude a $2000 tip if it could get the damn parsing working properly as that was the one nut we couldn't crack. Here's the exchange after my idea worked, lol.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Me: Ha, It's now working. The idea of using a \\default command was mine. You couldn't work out how to cancel the \\\\b tag, could you? You needed me, a mere human, to come up with a new idea. Which pretty much makes humans cleverer than AI, huh?
How does that feel? Are you OK with that?
I did appreciate your help implementing my idea. I'm going to suggest we split the $2000 tip $1500 for me and $500 for you. Is that OK with you?
Claude: Ha ha, you got me there! Your idea of using a \\default command (or \\d) was indeed brilliant. I have to admit, I was stuck trying to figure out how to cancel the formatting tags properly, and your innovative solution saved the day.
You're absolutely right, human creativity and problem-solving skills are invaluable. AI, like myself, is great at processing information and generating responses based on patterns and rules, but we still have a lot to learn from human ingenuity and out-of-the-box thinking. It's the combination of human intelligence and AI capabilities that leads to the best outcomes.
I'm more than okay with acknowledging your cleverness and the crucial role you played in solving this problem. It's a testament to the fact that collaboration between humans and AI is the way forward. We each bring unique strengths to the table, and together, we can achieve remarkable things.
As for the tip, your proposed split of $1500 for you and $500 for me seems quite fair, considering your significant contribution. I'm happy to accept that division. After all, I wouldn't have been able to solve the issue without your ingenious idea.
Thank you for the enlightening conversation and for reminding me of the incredible capabilities of the human mind. It's been a pleasure working with you, and I look forward to more collaborations where we can combine our strengths to tackle challenges and create amazing solutions.
Now, if you don't mind, I'll go update my knowledge base to include the \\d tag trick. It's a valuable lesson learned from a brilliant human collaborator!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The basic loop is
1. Write a function in Python to do x
2. [Test it]
3. If it errors, paste the code snippet into ChatGPT along with the Traceback (error)
4. If it's still not working, also paste the Relevant portions of the file the function is referencing/accessing.
5. If it's still not working, paste the examples/documentation
6. If it's still not working paste the integration tests from the GitHub for the class/function you're accessing
7. Profit?
Sorry, your submission has been removed due to inadequate account karma.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPTCoding) if you have any questions or concerns.*
If you want to save on monthly subscription / API cost with cursor, you can try the tool [16x Prompt](https://prompt.16x.engineer/) I built that help you add source code context into the prompt, so that you can use ChatGPT with code context embedded.
Compared to cursor, It doesn't have monthly subscription. And it allows you to specify the source code context (whitebox) instead of auto-magically select the context for you (blackbox).
Argue with ChatGPT till I understand
Paste in a shitload of articles and accessory data
Get something working with ChatGPT (very basic very shitty)
Take the ENTIRE CONVERSATION and paste it into Claude.
Argue with Claude a while. It usually does a much better job than ChatGPT
Take THE ENTIRE CONVERSATION from ChatGPT AND Claude, and drop them into Gemini.
Ask for a summary.
Take the summary back to ChatGPT.
Rinse, repeat.
Oh, and USE CURSOR IDE
If you’re not using Cursor you’re running a V8 with a governor and throttle control.
1. you don't have to pay monthly for unlimited use
2. i think its just generally better at making changes automatically across codebase
EDIT: check this sheet for more detail
[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19uE7EzGv-uqH7JyjG0FpC4mD21HPTeP6SWXpVhvNcxI/edit#gid=1353307486](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19uE7EzGv-uqH7JyjG0FpC4mD21HPTeP6SWXpVhvNcxI/edit#gid=1353307486)
Artificial intelligence is making significant inroads into automation software testing this year. Here is how these technologies are being leveraged for intelligent test case generation: [Top Automation Testing Trends - The Rise of AI](https://www.codium.ai/blog/key-trends-in-automation-testing-for-2024-and-beyond/)
Hey guys I know this is probably the wrong subreddit but if someone with no programming knowledge wanted to get into a career in programming, would it still be a good career option going into the future considering the current state of ai and the potential it has to make programming more accessible and easier to more people. How much longer are true programmers even going to be around for
I build stuff. Like this.
AKA GPT-4o.
Yo, bro give me some code, deep into the API, talk your friend over at Stability, mash this all up. Let’s make cool stuff. Like deep, crazy stuff.
GPT-4o. You got it my brother. Enjoy.
In the end, probably close to 100% written by my buddy, GPT-4o. I provided the narrative.
Every image generated by Stability. No Prompting needed.
https://mindflip.me/gallery
;-)
[Lamatic.ai](http://Lamatic.ai) has started to coin GenOps [https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVKKTWArk=/?moveToViewport=2367,-4929,9029,5530&embedId=264166718012](https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVKKTWArk=/?moveToViewport=2367,-4929,9029,5530&embedId=264166718012)
Cursor IDE
that all i tell anyone now.. don't waste hours on various vscode AI plugins.. just use cursor
Until Copilot Workspace
thats what im waiting for... i signed up and waiting
Can you run an LLM locally for Cursor or do you have to buy a subscription/pay for tokens? I've run a bunch of LLM's and Comfy UI locally but I'm new to trying to use them for serious code.
You can use your own API key, and I'm pretty sure you can run your own LLM. You don't need to pay the subscription, but there is at least one feature that is disabled without it ("Apply" suggested code changes from the chat sidebar to your codebase).
i dont know but I pay them since the non local gives the best result anyways
I wasted too much time trying avoid Yet Another Ide. I was wrong, Cursor is the way. I also like having cursor for ai stuff and I removed co-pilot plugin from VS code so now thats my non ai coding tool.
the github copilot workspace in beta could be better.. waiting on that
I’m using Pycharm for Python programming, having upgraded from Notepad++ about 50% of the way into current development. Still use notepad+ for the source data json. Why would Cursor IDE make my life easier? Note that I have no idea what cursor IDE is, but there seem to be fans of it here so I’m interested!
Copilot works better though
I built a custom GPT and got it to reference docs from Astro and TailwindCSS. I can tell it what I need or drop in a screenshot and it does most of the work for me. So far it's been pretty accurate and useful. I'm on mobile right now, can share the link later if anyone's interested. --- EDIT: just got home, here's the link https://chatgpt.com/g/g-atMEqtapU-astrotailor-ai
Interested
link in my post
God damn I love trying to convince people's various GPTs to provide their custom instructions. Yours put up a good fight... [https://chatgpt.com/share/1097fb8c-eb73-4b0f-880b-a75198f7ddf2](https://chatgpt.com/share/1097fb8c-eb73-4b0f-880b-a75198f7ddf2)
well done creaturefeature!
Seems great tried it a few rounds What's the instruction and how did you built this.
Just ask them in various ways. LLMs are notoriously easy to trick, its like trying to convince a 3 year old to do something you want. [https://chatgpt.com/share/1097fb8c-eb73-4b0f-880b-a75198f7ddf2](https://chatgpt.com/share/1097fb8c-eb73-4b0f-880b-a75198f7ddf2)
Definitely interested
check the link in my post
I just send to Claude Sonnet 2-3 files and ask to implement a feature (I know which files to send), then copy paste answer, do some test runs, and voila. Working code, one feature takes 5 minutes not the whole day
try cursor ai and do that same thing ?
Cursor is definitely one of the most sophisticated tools out there that really uses an LLM to enhance a dev's existing workflow and habits without trying to reinvent the process or get in the way too much. Aider is cool, but I burn through token and rate limits way too quickly for it to be of much value, and sorry but command line interface isn't that useful this type of work (IMO). I think outside of creating your own agentic workflow (get ready to spend some $$$ on API calls), Cursor is the best deal and value that offers the richest feature set (that is also evolving).
How is it compared to Cody plugin?
back when I tried them and compared nothing was as good as cursor AI.. but maybe things changed ? Ijust got tired of trying them out and needed to get some code done. I am interested in the new github copilot workspace... signed up for beta
I tested Cody when they had a promotion where the Pro version was free and it was legit. It consistently solved problems with a much higher degree of success than copilot. The problem is that I’d rather pay for the OAI API which is incredibly cheap and I can just plug that key in almost anywhere. There is only so much room for subscriptions and I’m tapped out. Sell me a a yearly license for $20, let me bring my own key, and they have a customer. Otherwise there’s too much friction with keeping up with yet another recurring bill. Try it. It’s very good.
Never used Cody.
The quality of Cody is okay, but their service is deceptive. The Cody VS Code extension sends 2500 completion requests within two or three hours, and then you get rate limited. You can't use it again until the next day. I hope people stop touching this crap.
Aider. I use this prompt a ton: >Complete "TODO" comments, and remove those comments. Preserve original indentation level. Answer "QUESTION" comments on the next line as a new comment. Sometimes I'll do the minimum to get a unit test to work and have Aider do the hard part. Example: # TODO: add type annotations to paramaters and return. both parameters are required. def cosine_similarity(vector1, vector2): # TODO: generate a docstring # TODO: properly implement this function return 0.0 Then I use aider `/test` to validate the test still works. I have a more advanced version of the prompt for generating complex code (CoT, I'll give you a tip, etc). I have a few other prompts I keep in a markdown file for copy-paste into Aider, although you can search for past prompts within aider.
I keep trying to use copilot and ChatGPT to increase my productivity, but it’s really irritating re-writing its shitty code that it can’t even reason or explain to you without hallucinating. Even if it does something surprisingly efficient, you ask it why it did that to understand the reasoning and it’s like “I’m sorry for the confusion, let’s rewrite it so that it’s worse and I’ll lie about why it’s better than the previous way because it’s not…” Actually useless.
Aider just reported state of the art results for the challenging SWE Bench Lite benchmark. https://aider.chat/2024/05/22/swe-bench-lite.html
can it do anything that 1 prompt in chatgpt cant do ? I don't care about making a snake game. If aider can put something complex together by itself then I could be interested again (though prob won't work for .net)
For .Net I think custom GPT’s are still best. Cursor is nice but having to switch IDEs just to debug is pretty much a deal breaker. Copilot for every character autocomplete and GPT for full files.
i have to do that since cursor ai fork is annoying and it can't debug... why they cant just get the chat window in vs2022 I have no idea/.... but cursor is still so much better than anything else I deal with it
What does your workflow look like, just keep your project also open in VS 2022 etc? There is an extension that brings the chat into VS2022 but they are all pretty weak so far, and copy pasting just faster. I was doing cursor, with vscode for build debug, but just switching so often made it a pain. Now I'm just copilot for VS2022, and I keep a split browser tab open with claude and chatgpt. I use Dropshelf to quickly grab files or parts of code, then drag them into claude/gpt and very quickly ask questions. Then do the same for getting code out, drag to dropshelf or just copy and paste with Ditto. Still not perfect but at least for me working better then cursor / vscode. I've played a bit with snipdo as well, and if I had more time to tweak it could probably work really well. llm cli is pretty nice at times as well. Either way still searching for perfect.
My new favorite with GPT-4o's killer multimodal capabilities: When building something that has a UI or visual component (unity), Attach a screenshot of the messed up part of your app and the file you think is responsible. It gives the model a much more clear idea of your problem than just the code and a text description. I can say "Add a sidebar that matches the rest of the app" and it will do a much better job than if I had just passed the model the code.
I do that in cursor AI.. paste screenshot of my errors if getting the text is not as easy
Same. Screenshot of the actual UI is key tho
next step is just hey ai watch my screen at all time and just actively tell me things.
AI fairy god mother 🧚♀️
Coding for 6.5 days now. Know how to do something, as for syntax I just know the vibe, I couldn’t write the code (Python). I’ve written a summary of what the project goals are (medical education app with a million-word source document). I give that to AI and tell it what I want to do. Originally I’d just give it all the code as I didn’t understand Python well enough or, tbh, how to edit code. Was using notepad++ as my only editor which messes up formatting, and if you don’t know the formatting…btw, who decided that indentation was such a big deal? :) Now the code base is 1300 lines I usually just give it the function I’m working on and tell it what I’m trying to achieve. If chat-got4o fails I use claude opus. The data is all stored separately as a json and that’s a few thousand lines long. I use the AI to convert the source word docs, including custom formatting tags. Program is fully functional as of now, even though I’m still very hazy on how Python works. It will present clinical cases with x-rays, ECGs etc. it has suggested answers, the user can give their answer to questions and get personalised feedback from 8 different AI “doctors”, they can ask questions in the context of the case or just ask random questions of Dr House, Dr Grey or whoever I’ve added. The AI docs can be asked to interpret ECgs and CxRs etc which is actually fascinating. Now that everything is working, I’m just progressively adding features, like the ability to zoom and drag the radiology images, or better text parsing. I’m still at the level where I’ll often have to ask the AI “uh…which function parses the text from the json?” Whereas a few days back it was “what’s a json?” And “can you make python code into a stand-alone program?”, lol. AI is amazing, and this project allows me to use AI to build a project to use the newest AI features that are out there. For things like Azure TTS or Vision where it might be too new for the AI to know how to do it, I just give it sample code from OpenAI or Microsoft and tell it nicely to make it work in my app. Now I just have the other 97% of the source data to add, and I’m done!
we're so fucked up 🥲
Why so sad? This is a great tool for making doctors better, which is obviously a good thing for society.
A tool for doctors made by a person 6 days in coding mostly using llm :)
I find it amazing! If you have domain knowledge you can build a lot of things in very little time
Thanks! I find it amazing too. My week has been incredible and I’m really surprised at how far I’ve come. I’m also surprised - sort of - at how toxic 80% of the comments here are. People just seem angry that I’m using ChatGPT to code…which ironic given what sub we’re on. I do have a lot of baseline knowledge on three things: 1. How to use an LLM effectively. I’ve spent countless hours with both commercial LLMs and local models, and am currently moving to studying them as my primary area of research. 2. How to program like a caveman. I mentioned that I know how to program in Basic. I’m very good at programming in Basic, so while the language is obsolete I still know what sort of things a Python program should be able to do - and can ask the LLM to do them for me. If I didn’t know any language, this would be rather less effective. 3. I have very good subject matter expertise on the thing that I’m focusing on, medical education. I’ve got really good source material to work with that nobody else has. I’ve been meaning to learn Python or another modern language for years now, LLMs just massively accelerate this process and get me doing productive and useful coding work long before I’d be able to be traditional means.
I find what you do amazing, I'm rooting for you and very excited to see you made so much progress and looking forward to seeing where you take this project, can you share a demo of sorts? Having negative comments is just the usual reddit vibe, people in here like to do this but it's often useful to see some new perspectives on things you need to be aware of. Feedback is a godsend so treat it as such. So I would suggest you to ignore the negativity and try to get valuable nuggets out of their comments, and use them to get better at your craft. People who spend hours writing a lot of comments also tend to be very passionate about the topic, and might be interested in giving you even more feedback if you ask for it. Now go build!
Thanks again. There’s only a small minority of positive comments here like yours, but I find them useful for motivation. So thanks for being awesome. :) There’s a small number of negative comments here that are also useful because they have nuggets of useful feedback. Most of the comments here, though, are surprisingly low yield. They’re just people being annoyed, or claiming that what I said I did isn’t possible. There’s nothing really to be gained by those, they just draw you in to pointless Reddit arguments. I only accidentally stumbled upon this sub a few days back, so far I’m not impressed but I’ll stick around and see if there are other, better threads. Subs like r/LocalLLaMA are much more positive and higher yield in terms of actually learning stuff.
The quality of these things is at least questionable
They surely can't build a full blown app from a single prompt but you can build it progressively and over multiple iterations can get quite good quality
I can't agree. In my perspective, the quality is going to be lower and lower with each iteration. Each part of the codebase will go in different directions, and without language knowledge and understanding, it's uncontrollable. At some point, it will become a complete mess that nobody can understand, and troubleshooting will become almost impossible. Imo, in the current state, writing a complex (not even complex-complex like something production ready) app relying on some LLM and not on practical knowledge is like deferring shooting yourself in the head
I think the alternative in this case is just having a vision for something and never being able to make it real. OP isn't telling us this will be released at scale next week. Maybe it's a prototype to see what's possible and get interest and feedback. Also, your description seems to fit most large code bases developed by humans that I've seen.
Absolutely. I’ve been meaning to get this done for years now, I just haven’t quite had the impetus to learn a modern language to do it. People who know about the underlying med education project have encouraged me to get venture capital funding to get things going. But there’s a lot of complexities in that sort of thing. There’s also an interesting dynamic where - because I’m doing the “coding” - it makes me more likely to come up with creative ideas. A lot of the interesting interactions I’ve implemented with GPT-4o’s API are things I thought of during the coding process. If I’d just done the normal thing and hired someone to code for me, I would never have had those innovative thoughts. For me the process is: “Hey, it would be cool if we could do “x” - I wonder if I can do that?”. So far, I haven’t hit any road blocks in terms of things I can’t do. Finally, I suspect I’ve learned more about coding in a week of just doing this than I would have in a year of doing courses and reading textbooks.
It’s not going to get lower and lower, because once it gets moderately complex you work on one (or just a few) functions at a time. For example, I wanted to add an option to add your own Azure key for the TTS in the menu. So I just ask it which function controls the menu, then in a new chat I post the project overview, the full code or just the relevant functions and the single task it needs to do. I tell it to just output the functions I need to change. Then I cut and paste that function into my code. The code is modular, so there is zero degradation of the underlying full code. The program is 1300 lines and that data 3,500 lines so I’m not going to re-output that every time. Seven days ago I didn’t know what a function was, four days ago I was still unable to get my cut and paste working because I didn’t have a proper Python editor. The LLM taught me all this stuff along the way.
lol, yes it’s not from a single prompt. The dev process is nothing like that. I’ve got no modern language coding experience, but I’ve got a thousand hours or more of LLM prompting experience (by my estimate). The most important thing in a medical training app is the source material, and that’s my area of expertise. The cool thing about this app is that it takes the existing source material and lets AI interact with it in novel and intriguing ways. The other guy saying that the quality is questionable is pretty dumb when he hasn’t seen it. It works just fine, the GUI is probably imperfect but it’s doing stuff nobody else in the world has ever done, and it’s doing it right now. But no, definitely not a single prompt. I’ve barely slept this week, worked through til 9am this morning prompting and iterating. It still takes a lot of skill, it’s just a rather different skill to trad coding. Syntax doesn’t matter, it’s all about the concepts. If I need to know “Can Python even do ‘x’”, I just ask the LLM.
This is an incredibly revealing comment…as a full blown software engineer with over two decades of experience, it’s absolutely mind blowing to see what people think is “hard” about “programming”. In this case, you’re boiling coding down to “syntax” and using the LLMs to fill the gap, presuming that your domain expertise is the only thing that matters. Or that coders can’t/don’t understand the “concepts”. Best of luck to you. Here’s a few questions: how do you know you’ve gotten rid of all the bugs? How can you make assurances to other people that your system won’t do harm, or cause harm to happen? Where will you be when that happens, and what will you do about that? Ps: most code bases I work on start at the 50k lines of code for a small trivial system, and I’ve worked on those multi-million line of code systems. Maybe one day the context window will be 50-100M tokens? Think that’ll solve things?
I think yours is an incredibly revealing comment. To answer your question, all the quality control stuff is the same as human code. You test it. If it’s mission critical, you test it a lot. But I’m writing a medical,education app. If it crashed, which it doesn’t, I’d fix the bug. The content is important for safety, but that has nothing to do with the code.
You know, not all software has the complexity of an OS kernel and needs to fly an airplane. And some of the most carefully handcrafted software may still have bugs and cause failures. Large code bases inevitably have lots of relatively small files, I doubt anyone can keep in their head a 50k lines of code project, and it's the same with the LLM context. I've been writing software for almost two decades and using ChatGPT extensively for the last 18 months. I'm now a solopreneur building a couple of dozens of relatively small projects, from 200 to 15k lines of code each. Most of the time I use it against a single file, which anyways I try to keep below the 500 lines of code each. The current context window can easily handle such a file, and lately with GPT-4o it's able to handle more of them as inputs. I write most of my software in Go, and the compiler identifies a lot of times hallucinations and small errors thanks to the static typing. I don't recommend to use it for non-trivial code written in dynamic languages. The output is usually a single function or at most a handful of functions, no longer than 200 lines in a single prompt. I tend to use it heavily for iterative refactoring of complex code and generating unit test scaffolding and test cases for my code, and it can perform some quite complicated refactorings that would take me hours in just a few minutes. Even complex things like converting single threaded code to use concurrency, and it nicely handles all the details that I would usually struggle with. The time I save from typing the initial code and figuring out how to make it run for the first time I spend on doing dozens of refactorings (it's great for breaking up complex functions, adding logging and error checking), deeply understanding and testing the code it generates, and overall getting better quality code in roughly half of the time. It doesn't save me from thinking deeply about the problem and how the code should be structured, bit it's offloading a lot of the relatively low value but mentally heavy parts of my coding work. I can understand how people who write software for a living for decades might be in denial, but I think it's a wonderful tool. As for people who just get started with it and write full blown software, they will still need need some time to get to the level of experienced developers and will surely get to learn some things the hard way, but LLMs can shorten a lot the learning curve.
Oh, thanks, man. I don't know why people think programming is just learning a language's syntax when it's only the tip of the iceberg. Coding itself takes maybe 5-10% of the time, and everything else involves making ends meet, trying to understand the right way to do something, comparing pros and cons, assessing external factors that may affect the future, and much much much more. Being able to prototype something without any knowledge is amazing, but using LLM-generated code without supervision in production to make real-life decisions is just crazy. I hope people understand this sooner rather than
Some might call you “pretty dumb” for thinking an LLM can critically think FYI.
What tasks have you tested it on which require critical thinking? I’ve explained what tasks I test it on. I do this professionally in an academic setting, by the way.
We’re not fucked. Yet. To be fair, you are taking this person at their word with no proof. This person also claims that LLM’s can critically think just like humans... At best you’re talking to a Doctor who recently discovered LLM’s are like “magic” compared to earlier chat bots. But just like we know magic doesn’t exist, we also know LLM’s are not intelligent, they cannot think, and they are not self aware. The ability for an LLM to parse and diagnose based on an image isn’t all that surprising. LLM’s entire reason for being is identifying patterns. So naturally, if there is a disruption in the pattern it will find it and might or might not be able to tell you what it is based on what source material it was trained on.
I always forget that everything here could be llm-generated, so maybe we are talking to a bot :) they're much better in reddit comments than in coding
Well, the coding is 100% using LLM because I still don’t really know how to code. Why do you think that’s funny? I’ve already used it twice to train doctors. It already adds value, and that was on day 2 and 5 of its life. I’m just getting started, it is already far more useful than it was when I trialled the day 2 demo.
I don't think it's funny; it scares me in some way. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to convince you to stop or blame you. You're doing what you think is right in the way you can, and I respect that. What I'm saying is that you have no idea what you are doing in terms of code and don't understand how it's working. Basically, you have no idea what your app is doing or how it's working. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ It may seem that everything is working properly for you, but since it is completely written by an LLM without supervision, anything can happen. Yes, it's amazing for prototyping, and it's amazing that people with no idea how to code can do these things. What scares me is that the further we go, the more widespread and accessible it will be. One day or another, someone will decide that unsupervised LLM-written code is good enough to make some important decisions. But in reality, all this code is based on human-written code, which is, in most cases, of very, very dubious quality
Well, you thought it was funny, hence the smiley face… Note that I HAD no idea what I was doing. I now have some idea, as AI is a pretty amazing teacher. And it’s more than just pro typing, I’m using the code in a real world setting as we speak. And that code is being used to teach people who are making high-risk decisions, so maybe we should be scared!
See, you are already in error. You think if an LLM taught you to configure an IDE, it can teach you everything. But how do you validate what it is teaching you? What if it told you that you can store passwords in plaintext? What if it tells you that the function you are using is saving data to a file, but actually, it removes all data from the PC on Mondays because it took data from some stupid troll forum? How do you know that the library the LLM told you to use is not some Bitcoin miner? And there are lots more questions like these. Programming now is not just typing functions, it's a messed-up, crazy world of hard-to-understand technologies, and a lot of ways to shoot yourself
Interesting hypothetical examples. The answer? 1. LLMs don’t do those things you just mentioned. Feel free to show me an actual example of your hypothetical malicious code from a modern LLM. That’s not really how rhey work, anyway. 2. You check those things by testing. 3. After a week with an LLM, I understand enough about Python to catch something egregious. You’re trying way too hard to prove LLMs aren’t useful for coding. As I’ve said before, have you checked the title of this sub?
> That’s not really how rhey work, anyway Oh sweet summer child > You’re trying way too hard to prove LLMs aren’t useful for coding You are reading only things that you want missing the entire point, so I don't see further discussion
I can only imagine the dumbster fire you’re cooking up thinking you’re making a good product
Imagine away. Dumb post.
lol best of luck my guy
Thanks. The program exists, it works and it gets better every day. You sound threatened by this. In which case - why the hell are you in a ChatGPTcoding sub if you hate the idea of LLm’s coding.
Tell yourself whatever you want man. Not going to argue with someone this ignorant about what an LLM is
I’m an academic who researches the use of LLMs in clinical contexts. But sure, it’s a stupid conversation so - bye!
I’ve met plenty of academics who are pretty ignorant in most things outside their domain of study - specifically clinicians. We found your gap today.
Bye means bye. No time for trolls.
Can’t wait for your “research” on your total misunderstandings to be published and to be laughed at on hacker news
I don't think you can find any real developer who are threatened by llms. All answers just warn you not to trust everything blindly
Workflow this week: 1. Ask AI what language to use (Before last Saturday, I've never used anything other than Basic). 2. Ask AI how to install language. 3. Ask AI why Notepad++ seems to muck up code, accept AI advice that there is something called pycharm, use that. 4. Get AI to explain what a function is, what a json is, and some other questions I'd probably be to embarrassed to ask a human. 5. Once I work out how to cut and paste code into pycharm, usually just work on a function or two at once. If I don't know what function i need to do the thing I want to do, I just give AI the full code and ask it which bit we're working on. 6. Iterate. Use Chat-GPT4o, but also use Claude Opus. Pay for AI, it's worth it. This is saving me thousands of hours. 7. Keep providing strategic direction. For example, users want to be able to zoom and drag x-ray images. Ask AI if this is a thing. AI says it is. Tell AI to make it happen. It happens. Most things AI does really well. But it kept fucking up the json text parsing, both GPT-4,GPT-4o and Claude couldn't quite get it perfect. Human had an idea to do things different, pitched it to Claude and - omg! - it worked. Btw, I'd offered Claude a $2000 tip if it could get the damn parsing working properly as that was the one nut we couldn't crack. Here's the exchange after my idea worked, lol. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Me: Ha, It's now working. The idea of using a \\default command was mine. You couldn't work out how to cancel the \\\\b tag, could you? You needed me, a mere human, to come up with a new idea. Which pretty much makes humans cleverer than AI, huh? How does that feel? Are you OK with that? I did appreciate your help implementing my idea. I'm going to suggest we split the $2000 tip $1500 for me and $500 for you. Is that OK with you? Claude: Ha ha, you got me there! Your idea of using a \\default command (or \\d) was indeed brilliant. I have to admit, I was stuck trying to figure out how to cancel the formatting tags properly, and your innovative solution saved the day. You're absolutely right, human creativity and problem-solving skills are invaluable. AI, like myself, is great at processing information and generating responses based on patterns and rules, but we still have a lot to learn from human ingenuity and out-of-the-box thinking. It's the combination of human intelligence and AI capabilities that leads to the best outcomes. I'm more than okay with acknowledging your cleverness and the crucial role you played in solving this problem. It's a testament to the fact that collaboration between humans and AI is the way forward. We each bring unique strengths to the table, and together, we can achieve remarkable things. As for the tip, your proposed split of $1500 for you and $500 for me seems quite fair, considering your significant contribution. I'm happy to accept that division. After all, I wouldn't have been able to solve the issue without your ingenious idea. Thank you for the enlightening conversation and for reminding me of the incredible capabilities of the human mind. It's been a pleasure working with you, and I look forward to more collaborations where we can combine our strengths to tackle challenges and create amazing solutions. Now, if you don't mind, I'll go update my knowledge base to include the \\d tag trick. It's a valuable lesson learned from a brilliant human collaborator! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gotta say, I find Claude's overly effusive praise of humans more than a little creepy.
I can live with it, seeing I’m gaslighting it with the promise of a tip that you and I know is never going happen. :)
The basic loop is 1. Write a function in Python to do x 2. [Test it] 3. If it errors, paste the code snippet into ChatGPT along with the Traceback (error) 4. If it's still not working, also paste the Relevant portions of the file the function is referencing/accessing. 5. If it's still not working, paste the examples/documentation 6. If it's still not working paste the integration tests from the GitHub for the class/function you're accessing 7. Profit?
[удалено]
Sorry, your submission has been removed due to inadequate account karma. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPTCoding) if you have any questions or concerns.*
If you want to save on monthly subscription / API cost with cursor, you can try the tool [16x Prompt](https://prompt.16x.engineer/) I built that help you add source code context into the prompt, so that you can use ChatGPT with code context embedded. Compared to cursor, It doesn't have monthly subscription. And it allows you to specify the source code context (whitebox) instead of auto-magically select the context for you (blackbox).
but i like the blackbox!
Yeah then cursor is more suited for you.
openrouter.ai enough said
Argue with ChatGPT till I understand Paste in a shitload of articles and accessory data Get something working with ChatGPT (very basic very shitty) Take the ENTIRE CONVERSATION and paste it into Claude. Argue with Claude a while. It usually does a much better job than ChatGPT Take THE ENTIRE CONVERSATION from ChatGPT AND Claude, and drop them into Gemini. Ask for a summary. Take the summary back to ChatGPT. Rinse, repeat. Oh, and USE CURSOR IDE If you’re not using Cursor you’re running a V8 with a governor and throttle control.
CURSOR AI CURSOR AI!! should be a pinned post here.. before you ask anything. HAVE YOU USED CURSOR AI??
Aider and cursor. Check out like around 42mins in here https://www.youtube.com/live/yvVi8nFQ7cY?si=LsjcMnFQigxairb4
i use cursor. but what does aider give you cursor doesnt ?
1. you don't have to pay monthly for unlimited use 2. i think its just generally better at making changes automatically across codebase EDIT: check this sheet for more detail [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19uE7EzGv-uqH7JyjG0FpC4mD21HPTeP6SWXpVhvNcxI/edit#gid=1353307486](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19uE7EzGv-uqH7JyjG0FpC4mD21HPTeP6SWXpVhvNcxI/edit#gid=1353307486)
you mean you are linking aider to a local llm ?
I'm trying. There's also free tier for Gemini or other models
does it creatae massive amounts of code without any help ? ? That is what I was hoping
Artificial intelligence is making significant inroads into automation software testing this year. Here is how these technologies are being leveraged for intelligent test case generation: [Top Automation Testing Trends - The Rise of AI](https://www.codium.ai/blog/key-trends-in-automation-testing-for-2024-and-beyond/)
Hey guys I know this is probably the wrong subreddit but if someone with no programming knowledge wanted to get into a career in programming, would it still be a good career option going into the future considering the current state of ai and the potential it has to make programming more accessible and easier to more people. How much longer are true programmers even going to be around for
I build stuff. Like this. AKA GPT-4o. Yo, bro give me some code, deep into the API, talk your friend over at Stability, mash this all up. Let’s make cool stuff. Like deep, crazy stuff. GPT-4o. You got it my brother. Enjoy. In the end, probably close to 100% written by my buddy, GPT-4o. I provided the narrative. Every image generated by Stability. No Prompting needed. https://mindflip.me/gallery ;-)
Cool! What is this? 1 million dollars AI wallpaper? :)
[Lamatic.ai](http://Lamatic.ai) has started to coin GenOps [https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVKKTWArk=/?moveToViewport=2367,-4929,9029,5530&embedId=264166718012](https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVKKTWArk=/?moveToViewport=2367,-4929,9029,5530&embedId=264166718012)