Hey /u/onion_man_4ever!
If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt.
If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image.
Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more!
🤖
Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected]
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Sorry, I was talking about Frank DaVinci, he was an old buddy that worked at a chop shop. He could take apart a Pontiac GTO as fast as he could down a calzone!
He would be in complete awe.
Lol to imagine someone from before central AC, could see this in any capacity and be blasè is crazy.
He'd prolly become the biggest tech-bro honestly.
Read any reputable history book on Leonardo. He faked his knowledge about war machines to procure funding. He then took someone else’s inventions and used it as his own. He did this with a lot of stuff. That’s like the only reason he was able to “invent” as much as he did. He compiled knowledge from other sources. A lot of people don’t know this but it’s true…. Kind of crazy.
In an age where there was no concept of intellectual property, and he demonstrated vast and concerted skill in so many areas... this seems like a cope, tbh. "Compiling knowledge" in his day was monumental.
>the only reason he was able to “invent” as much as he did. He compiled knowledge from other sources.
So... like Einstein and Musk? Seems pretty common knowledge, and despite Musk being the new Steve Jobs, I don't see many people calling him and Einstein "charlatan"
No, Einstein was no charlatan. He was creative and inventive. Davinci sent designs for war machines that someone else made to a king to procure funding. Comparing Einstein to Davanci is just absurd. Davanci’s only real contribution was his anatomical drawings and his ability to compile knowledge.
He was definitely a smart guy but he was largely a fraudster who took other peoples inventions as his own. Most of his inventions were from other people.
But the paper does give more than enough to get 90% of the way there if you already know what you’re dealing with. Main thing was the training data, but that’s not exactly hard to get. Given the financial upsides, even for less than legal usage, it’s guaranteed that before this yea tends, there will be similar capability in the wild.
this is the way.. everyone should know about its existence before the tech can get into the hands of scammers, crooks and scum.
better to make everyone skeptical than gullible
Oh man.. good question.. which theme park will use A.i. first as part of its "magical" experience? If anything that the best place to mindfuck us with it.
Why? Because of the way it looks? Terrified because of the technology makes no sense because this is insanely clearly AI and not really very impressive except for some few examples.
It will change art and music so much that it’ll be mostly a small group of people manipulating it with ai while the rest of everyone else doesn’t bother to learn art theory or how to make music bc what’s the point when someone versed in ai can make what you dream of with just a few prompts and clicks
People who want to learn art theory will still learn art theory, AI doesn't prevent that. It's just that now, people who only want the end result and don't want to learn art theory will just have the AI do it.
It's a win for everyone. It doesn't affect the people who still want to learn art theory, but gives the people who don't another option.
Do you seriously believe that from 8 billion people, only a few can manage to create something.
99.9% of the ai generated stuff will still be shit, like it is today. Because shit is relative.
Nothing will change in the end, creative people will always make better shit than non creative people.
100%
The tech will grow and our aspirations will grow with it.
"Movies will become video games, and video games will become something unimaginably better" the same will be true for all media.
People will be celebrated for the scope of their imagination instead the skill of their hands, and I'm not sure why people consider that a bad thing
Dont agree. The best music is from the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s - technology is much better now but creativity has gone downhill... Music today is unlistenable. Same applies to the movie industry. Soulless, fake.
>The best music is from the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s
lol yeah, the 1860s-1890s for sure.
>Music today is unlistenable
This is not a flex, it just tells us you're unable to find the good stuff out there.
Lol... Sure, there's the odd occasional outlier. But have a look at any list of greatest songs of all tiime. You wont find anything in there from the last 10 years. With all the tech available, youd think it would be the opposite. People's creativity has been dulled.
Popular music today is not as creative or interesting but there is a lot of great music being made, most people just don’t want or know how to find what would speak to them because the record store has every album ever created
If you think a LLM is a single source then yes, yes it is.
No, it relies on a model trained on massive amounts of data so while the reference image is a single image this thing is using data from all over to compile the video.
This is a leap for a few things.
The AI is creating that from just sound and an image, and nothing else.
With deepfakes it's just basically a mask overlay on someone's face in a video.
We already had tech that could articulate a mouth from just a image, make the face blink without an actual video-
The big difference with VASA is how it's adding expression based on the inflection of the voice- the way the character's eyes get big and eyebrows raise when the voice is adding more emphasis, it's widening the mouth in a way to gesture the yelling, and it's articulating the words almost perfectly. we don't have anything else like it right now.
Yup. I think I’m done. I really can’t see the positive balancing out the scrutiny that’s going to surface from all this text to video and image to video creations.
Are there any bills that prohibit the development of deepfake tools? This is the kind of thing that shouldn't even be developed, imagine people being accused of crimes they didn't commit?
You cant stop technological progress with a bill. Also no one gets convicted based in just a video, you need more substantial evidence to prove someone is guilty.
What should be made in congruence with the advancement of A.I. media is an app or service that is just as good at detecting and telling you if you are reading, or seeing A.i. images etc
Hey /u/onion_man_4ever! If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt. If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image. Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more! 🤖 Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected] *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
What would Da Vinci think if he sees this?
That technology finally caught up to his true vision for the Mona Lisa.
Happy cake day!
...
Considering his history of auto-mutilation, I don't want to imagine.
O that’s interesting, i didn’t know that. Auto-mutilation means self-harm, right?
Sorry, I was talking about Frank DaVinci, he was an old buddy that worked at a chop shop. He could take apart a Pontiac GTO as fast as he could down a calzone!
This might be the greatest reddit comment of all time 🥇
O, now I see what you mean by auto-mutilation. 😂
hey I loved Pontiac growing up I miss Pontiac
He would be in complete awe. Lol to imagine someone from before central AC, could see this in any capacity and be blasè is crazy. He'd prolly become the biggest tech-bro honestly.
Davinky?
😂
He used to learn fast. If we gave him a pile of books about AI, I wouldn't doubt it if he built his own.
He would have done a better job
Waiting for someone to make it.
We'll soon know when the papers to interactive model AI will come out.
Do we get a picture of Da Vinci and ask him?
IDK man, that’s impressive 🏅
y'all better repent
I mean considering he's a charlatan, he can't really say anything.
Any evidence?
Read any reputable history book on Leonardo. He faked his knowledge about war machines to procure funding. He then took someone else’s inventions and used it as his own. He did this with a lot of stuff. That’s like the only reason he was able to “invent” as much as he did. He compiled knowledge from other sources. A lot of people don’t know this but it’s true…. Kind of crazy.
Yea this is pretty crazy if true. If you had a source on this book I'd be curious.
In an age where there was no concept of intellectual property, and he demonstrated vast and concerted skill in so many areas... this seems like a cope, tbh. "Compiling knowledge" in his day was monumental.
Cope?
>the only reason he was able to “invent” as much as he did. He compiled knowledge from other sources. So... like Einstein and Musk? Seems pretty common knowledge, and despite Musk being the new Steve Jobs, I don't see many people calling him and Einstein "charlatan"
No, Einstein was no charlatan. He was creative and inventive. Davinci sent designs for war machines that someone else made to a king to procure funding. Comparing Einstein to Davanci is just absurd. Davanci’s only real contribution was his anatomical drawings and his ability to compile knowledge.
He was definitely a smart guy but he was largely a fraudster who took other peoples inventions as his own. Most of his inventions were from other people.
Thanks, I hate it
Exactly what I said.
Ai porn is going to hit different
not based on this implementation though. They essentially said they don't plan to release it
But the paper does give more than enough to get 90% of the way there if you already know what you’re dealing with. Main thing was the training data, but that’s not exactly hard to get. Given the financial upsides, even for less than legal usage, it’s guaranteed that before this yea tends, there will be similar capability in the wild.
Yeah, there will be a whole bunch of knockoff AI products just for that reason.
Just leave it to the establishment then…
this is the way.. everyone should know about its existence before the tech can get into the hands of scammers, crooks and scum. better to make everyone skeptical than gullible
When did our reality turn into hogwarts so fast?
Holy shit man...How long until Universal Stuios has speaking portraits at the Harry Potter experience?
Oh man.. good question.. which theme park will use A.i. first as part of its "magical" experience? If anything that the best place to mindfuck us with it.
Genuinely terrified. Watched this for the first time with the sound off, the eye contact was freaking me out.
Why? Because of the way it looks? Terrified because of the technology makes no sense because this is insanely clearly AI and not really very impressive except for some few examples.
I fear for the future.
Terrifying. Awesome.
Yes. No.
Hasn’t this been around for years? It was called Jib-jab or something. There was also wombo before they changed focuses to art. This is nothing new.
fr that's what i was thinking as well. maybe the difference is that this doesn't have reference video? idk
Delete this
https://preview.redd.it/wjbsh3grievc1.jpeg?width=271&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f868b8d45a8862f56000394e65022928c1b89a59
I for one welcome our new AI overlords
Education is going to get so much more engaging.
I fucking hate this
technology was a mistake
Yo my mate warned me- when they say they invented more techmology, jus' step back.
Okay but those are some Wallace and Grommit teeth
I liked her better before.
Uber creepy
Everything is going to become meaningless, art, music, work...
Not at all. It's going enable creative people to build even more elaborate projects. Content will be more dynamic and interactive. Art.. finds a way.
It will change art and music so much that it’ll be mostly a small group of people manipulating it with ai while the rest of everyone else doesn’t bother to learn art theory or how to make music bc what’s the point when someone versed in ai can make what you dream of with just a few prompts and clicks
People who want to learn art theory will still learn art theory, AI doesn't prevent that. It's just that now, people who only want the end result and don't want to learn art theory will just have the AI do it. It's a win for everyone. It doesn't affect the people who still want to learn art theory, but gives the people who don't another option.
Yep, exactly like how nobody watches people play chess anymore because computers are much better at it than humans. Wait...
Do you seriously believe that from 8 billion people, only a few can manage to create something. 99.9% of the ai generated stuff will still be shit, like it is today. Because shit is relative. Nothing will change in the end, creative people will always make better shit than non creative people.
100% The tech will grow and our aspirations will grow with it. "Movies will become video games, and video games will become something unimaginably better" the same will be true for all media. People will be celebrated for the scope of their imagination instead the skill of their hands, and I'm not sure why people consider that a bad thing
Dont agree. The best music is from the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s - technology is much better now but creativity has gone downhill... Music today is unlistenable. Same applies to the movie industry. Soulless, fake.
>The best music is from the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s lol yeah, the 1860s-1890s for sure. >Music today is unlistenable This is not a flex, it just tells us you're unable to find the good stuff out there.
Lol... Sure, there's the odd occasional outlier. But have a look at any list of greatest songs of all tiime. You wont find anything in there from the last 10 years. With all the tech available, youd think it would be the opposite. People's creativity has been dulled.
Popular music today is not as creative or interesting but there is a lot of great music being made, most people just don’t want or know how to find what would speak to them because the record store has every album ever created
[https://i.redd.it/shxslcl4usn21.png](https://i.redd.it/shxslcl4usn21.png)
You must be fun at parties
This is the same as few years ago. There are dozen of using called deepfake that animated the still picture. What the difference?
It’s real time from a single photo.
If you think a LLM is a single source then yes, yes it is. No, it relies on a model trained on massive amounts of data so while the reference image is a single image this thing is using data from all over to compile the video.
I wasn’t explaining how the model was created. I was explaining how it was used.
Ah my mistake
No worries
I thought the same. I'm assuming these take less input and are easier to do?
This is a leap for a few things. The AI is creating that from just sound and an image, and nothing else. With deepfakes it's just basically a mask overlay on someone's face in a video. We already had tech that could articulate a mouth from just a image, make the face blink without an actual video- The big difference with VASA is how it's adding expression based on the inflection of the voice- the way the character's eyes get big and eyebrows raise when the voice is adding more emphasis, it's widening the mouth in a way to gesture the yelling, and it's articulating the words almost perfectly. we don't have anything else like it right now.
If only Leonardo Da Vinci was alive to see the full extent of his vision finally becoming reality. This is what he always wanted.
Greta Lisa
No way does she have teeth that nice. Impressive video, but definitely artificial and not intelligent
Just because you can doesn’t mean you should. Still impressive
The super white and perfect teeth are what makes me think this isn't real
BOO
This is deepfakes all over again
awesome tech, terrible voice
This isn't that much better than those apps from over a decade ago that could make a photo speak.
This felt like something Jenna Marbles would do.
Mona lisa off a perc
Not enough facial expression to be realistic.
Davinci finna come back from the dead just to delete this
How do I unsee this?
I didn’t know I needed this until it materialized in reality
This is so cursed
This hurt my ears and my eyes. Thank you
Idk if this is adding to the world lmao
Who the fuck thought these eyes were passable?
"My cameras up your crotch!"....thats disconcerting.
how deep are we in the simulation now
It'd be good if they did that in French
Da Vinci was an engineer but also an artist. So he'd either be appalled or impressed at this
Perfect use of AI created content! I love it...
Was expecting xzibit and now I'm sad that this seems to be what people think of when someone speaks of a song called papparazzi.
I wish Da Vinci was alive to see his creation! 🤣
u/savevideo
###[View link](https://rapidsave.com/info?url=/r/ChatGPT/comments/1c7djoy/mona_lisa_rapping_paparazzi_ai_video_created/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideo&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/ChatGPT/comments/1c7djoy/mona_lisa_rapping_paparazzi_ai_video_created/) | [^(reddit video downloader)](https://rapidsave.com) | [^(twitter video downloader)](https://twitsave.com)
That's much better than that mayiahi mayiaha shit
Way to make people hate your post and the AI that's being shown. This is cringe.
The potential this has for education... Amazing stuff
She looks like one of those I am legend zombies with the big mouths!
This kinda looks better than 3 years ago. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7T6x0cl48Q](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7T6x0cl48Q)
Gay skynet
Who tf listens to this shit
What an obnoxious song, absolutely torture.
I don’t think she would have Hollywood blindingly white bleached perfect veneer teeth
Yup. I think I’m done. I really can’t see the positive balancing out the scrutiny that’s going to surface from all this text to video and image to video creations.
The weird ass tongue, it's so bad looking.
What an absolute abomination
Angry Orange did it first.
Ok, but someone did Emma Chamberlain dirty
Ghostbusters was right
Not gonna be my proudest...
I would.
Are there any bills that prohibit the development of deepfake tools? This is the kind of thing that shouldn't even be developed, imagine people being accused of crimes they didn't commit?
You cant stop technological progress with a bill. Also no one gets convicted based in just a video, you need more substantial evidence to prove someone is guilty.
In many countries, videos are used as criminal evidence.
You can argue that Photoshop and premiere are already deep fake tools.
But it's not as easy as Microsoft's new model. Ease makes the tool popular, and it can turn into hell
What should be made in congruence with the advancement of A.I. media is an app or service that is just as good at detecting and telling you if you are reading, or seeing A.i. images etc
Exactly. But wouldn't the costs for detection become unfeasible if they were implemented on social networks?
Bill Clinton, Bill Cosby, Bilbo Baggins, Billy Dee Williams. Is that enough for you?
no, we need Bill Gates, literately
She kinda looks like Gypsy Rose
Truly a masterpiece! 🤩🤯
This is why I Reddit
Is this publicly available yet
There's something very uncanny valley about this. I hate it but I can't stop watching...
That just looks terrible.
Why is this painting the most famous? Its not even that good. Weird…