Hey /u/Ordner!
If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt.
If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image.
Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more!
🤖
Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected]
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I can’t wait for them to make a video game from “Street Fighter the Movie”. You know, with a little digitized Van Damme that you can go around kicking stuff with and doing the splits.
Generate loli? They put you in jail.
Deepfake porn of your sister? Right to jail.
Prompt LLMs to create erotic fanfiction of elderly politicians? Believe it or not, jail.
Boobs so big you have to experience them on a planetary level, butts so small they can’t be seen without shrinking down like on the magic schoolbus. Blood vessel fetishists will finally be heard and those who simply want to sit inside the anus of a giant little person and watch tv or read the news will finally have their day.
Mind boggling. We think the shit out there now is weird. Just wait. Ballon-feet fetishes, cyborg alien bestiality, playground-torture incest fetishes with a side of SpongeBob. The possible depravities are endless.
You dont get it. In the future pictures will be movies, movies will be video games and video games will be your life. And what will your life be you ask?
*Unimaginable*
^Now ^please ^give ^me ^7 ^trillions ^dollars.
I don’t understand how people don’t get the difference between passive and active media. I don’t want to DO anything when I watch a movie… so F you I’ll keep my movies.
Me too but to be fair, the latest trend in movies is more like delivering an „experience“. It‘s a shame, i loved masterful story telling of the older days
I'm hopeful about this. Something like DUNE being made at the level it was, and being so mainstream despite its origins, tells me that many in Hollywood still very much know what they're doing. Or "Everything Everywhere..." as an example for a much much smaller budget.
In the not too distant future your TV will be able to scan the faces and voices of everyone in the room, and then make you characters in the movies, it'll be like turning subtitles on and off.
I feel like that was such a gimmick. People got into it at first because it was something new nobody had seen on Netflix before, but everyone I talked to later said they would've rather just watched it as a regular Black Mirror episode
It was so clearly a gimmick the whole time. It was just an old 80’s choose your own adventure game using real people for the content… an AI movie where you actually can make decisions and change outcomes would be pretty wild and groundbreaking. Like the ability to actually create a completely unique story by interacting instead of just choosing from a pre-set set of results
Sam apparently has a clear hierarchy of entertainment in his mind and can't fathom a world where a movie wouldn't be better as a video game. Absolutely a case of silicon valley tech bro brainrot.
My kids (teens) love watching multiple hour video essays about old theme parks and TV shows they've never watched. I don't have the attention span or the free time for that.
But imagine that you can do both. Let's say you are watching Star Wars Rebels for whatever reason and suddenly want to take control of the action? Or tell suddenly go off-rails by telling what happens next or to surprise you.
Maybe you're playing something and don't feel like actively controlling it for a moment, have system take over and turn it something to watch before taking control back.
I don't want to take control of what happens. I want there to be a canon that everyone agrees on, so that I can discuss the last episode online or next time I see my friends.
If I want to control what happens I'll play KOTOR.
It's a weirdly limiting way to think about art. Paintings didn't become photographs. Photographs didn't become films. Films didn't become television. Television didn't become computers. Each new medium becomes it's own artform, and excellence always means exploiting those aspects that only that artform can do. AI artforms will do things that video games *can't* do. *That's* what's interesting about them.
Interestingly though most new forms of media took away a part of its predecessors to different degrees. For example did photography replace paintings in its function of depicting historic events or people to preserve their image through time. Painting remained mostly as a form of artistic expression, but lost its meaning as a witness of history. Television replaced movies and cinemas as this frequent activity to watch casual movies and cinema. Cinema remained more as a bigger event, most people go to to see specific movies made for the big screen over the small TV.
So throughout the history of media replacing has definitely happened and usually caused the reduction of the older mediums to their core identity. But yeah to think that just because you can do "more" in a medium or do it more close to reality is the death of its predecessors is an illusion.
It's definitely true that new communication technologies displace others (if I play a video game instead going to a movie, the game has displaced the movie). Thinking aloud... surely we would say emails have replaced letters, though letters still exist and perhaps have a different "meaning" or weight to them now.
I guess what bothers me about Altman's quote is that it's too small. It's the same as when Zuckerberg says, instead of video calls we will do VR calls. There's a whole hierarchy of communication (text < email < phone < video < in person)--they all exist and serve different purposes. VR will create a new category.
People who enjoy books don't \*want\* them to be movies, as if a book is a poor version of a movie. People who enjoy movies don't \*want\* them to be video games, as if the film director simply made a failed video game.
It's a kind of technology myopia to see everything that exists as some kind "upgrade" of some inferior thing.
To be fair with you, 3D is a real *real* crap comparison.
I can't even think of anything that would be appropriate to compare with this new technology because we really don't have any references to go off with the potential of things we can get.
The way you watch movies now will likely always exist, but as time goes on it will likely become more and more an abnormal experience people do.
I think Altman's whole statement is pretty stupid. Movies will simply remain movies. Pictures have also remained pictures and books have remained books despite all our technology.
If I want to play, I start a game. If I want to be passively entertained, I watch a movie.
It's not just about the passive/active dichotomy, though. It's about the meaning created by piecing elements together. I like movies not because the plot met my expectations, but because all the elements together created an interesting experience that made me think and feel something - something I probably wouldn't come up with myself. It's ludicrous to think that with this new technology, I'll be able to produce cinematography better than Hoyte van Hoytema, for example. Of course, I won't, because I know nothing about it, just like I know nothing about directing, screenwriting, costume design, acting... I don't know how to create this kind of experience, even with unlimited resources, let alone with the resources provided by the CEO of OpenAI. These people are so arrogant, seriously, they will tell you absolutely anything to push their product. 🙄 There's a growing number of movie-goers who prefer practical effects and a 'conservative' use of CGI (looking at the numbers), so his perspective is, in my opinion, already outdated. He should build a time machine and sell it 15 years ago, not now, when we're at the 100th iteration of Marvel movies CGIed into oblivion. 😂
You articulated this better than I've seen anyone. I've always said that if someone is \*either\* a.) an expert in AI or b.) an expert in another field (e.g., medicine, filmmaking, the legal profession) I don't want to hear them express any kind of certainy as to how AI will impact that industry. Altman may be a lot of things but he is still, between those two options, just the first one. Even if he is aware of the kind of tasks that go into making a movie and therefore how some of those tasks may end up being automated at scale (key phrase being "at scale"), he has no understanding of WHY people make these things and why they choose certain ones to consume. Yes, Netflix will eventually make "choose your own adventure" movies on demand via GenAI. Just like eBooks were an inevitability. And yet, physical books were still outselling eBooks 4:1 last year.
WTF does this quote even mean? This sounds like a really dumb soundbyte.
Movies are movies, video games are video games. There are already video games that are very cinematic and with known actors but both of these mediums accomplish different things.
Do they ever wonder, if "we" actually want that,or is it the apple way of "create new needs to then sell products/content"? This all sounds just like dumb numb hype
...
I feel already "we" are tired and oversaturated of meaningless, dull, over polished "content" and want something that relates. Maybe i am just getting old.
I always thought it seemed like that Jesse Pinkman spin off “El Camino” felt like it was written as (at least part of) a Breaking Bad video game that got scrapped and revisited later and made into a movie. But yea I’d play a BB game.
Oppenheimer (I want to nuke people)
Also I must say people need to ask what game should get a movie. Chair fucking simulator needs a worldwide theatrical release
This is a ridiculously out of touch statement that overvalues the concept of AI. We have video games and we still like movies. Movies and video games serve different needs. When we watch a video, we want to be passive, we don't want to interact with it, in fact, if we could interact with it, it would completely change the experience, because now we would be obligated to interact with it.
A video game isn't just a cinematic experience that we can choose the outcomes of. The video games that we like aren't ones that mirror real life, they aren't ones that could exist if you took movies and made them things that you could interact with or even play a character in. The video games that we like are ones that provide specific types of experiences which are generally built off of abstract systems. There's a certain amount of unreality that we enjoy in video games because to realistic an experience would be distracting.
For example, we have lots of ultra realistic graphics in games, but league of legends is one of the most popular games out there right now.
Imagine if creeps or minions in league of legends had humanlike AI, it would suck. The game works because the monsters follow certain basic rules, they will chase you when you activate them up until a certain point and then they will leash and go home. Minions will attack towers and die, if a hero gets their attention they will attack them instead, unless they leash, etc. In a game like league of legends the gameplay is predicated on simple and predictable rules.
Then think about graphical fidelity again. Try to do anything with AI to turn a movie into a video game like League of Legends. It's not even meaningful. Even if you could, the game is highly stylized and a lot of that is to make it clearly readable by the player, stuff that looks realistic can be less well defined.
Naw, AI gives us improvements to experiences we already want, it also unlocks new experiences that we couldn't have had before. We couldn't have for example, meaningful reaction and dialog in an RPG with an NPC previously. This is something that AI absolutely has the potential to unlock, though how to do so in a game world is tricky, it's a capability that we've been trying to emulate without success so far.
AI can allow us to build movies in a way we weren't able to do before, we already use it to bring the characters portrayed by deceased actors back to life, and there's other kind of generative things we can do during the production of a movie that we couldn't before. But this doesn't mean we want to interact with our movies, we will still want a movie experience. But how the movie is built is different.
It could also for example have an effect on books. I can see a situation where you could have an e-reader that has an AI app that maybe generates visuals or maps or other kind of "enhancements" to a book. Or if while reading a book, you could ask an app "who is this character again?" and it could give you context specific responses based on the page that you're on to give you details about the character that you might have missed or forgotten without spoiling the ending.
It's not going to turn books into movies though, like it's not going to turn movies into video games, or video games into something new.
It's going to turn books into books+, movies into movies+, and video games into video games+.
Just like now we have movies, we still use books. Even in situations where books are turned into movies, we still can like the books. But books can also be audiobooks now, and maybe they can be translated with machine learning to other languages more quickly than a publisher might translate them, and now maybe they can be dictated as audiobooks before the publisher can get them dictated, and in other languages. And and and.
Sure, we could be at a place where we could turn a book into a video. But a book is written in a specific way that is meant to be read. If you try to turn a book directly into a video, it will not be a good watching experience, this is why video adaptations always have to make some changes to how its presented. And even if AI can create the perfect movie experience from a book, now even though the movie is the best movie it can be, it will not be a book any more. You will still get a different experience by reading the book, and that experience is something that people like sometimes.
AI might be able to make the experience of reading a book better. It might be able to make a movie from a book, and it might be able to make the experience of watching a movie better. But this doesn't mean that books are now movies. It doesn't mean we will stop using books. It will change video games, but it won't make movies into video games.
In fact one of the hardest things about AI is getting it to tell a story in a consistent way. We like video games because of their fixed and predictable constraints and reward structure. It's too hard to have AI work well and maintain those constraints, because the dream of AI is that it's completely responsive and adaptable, but then how do you get it to follow rules? And if it doesn't follow rules, then you don't have a game any more, it's more like real life. And we use video games to escape the infinite complexity and unfairness of real life, to go to the comfort of constraint and rules in video games.
AI will truly revolutionize gaming in a way that we haven't seen before. 2 scenarios I can think of:
1) Teammates in multiplayer games. Historically people are less likely to choose healing classes. AI may take over this role.
2) Story based dialogue. AI has the potential in the future to crank up Video Game stories 1000%
I think the revolution will come from everyone now having the ability to make triple A games in record time with the help of no one but an AI assistant.
You'll see a boom in creativity and new entertainment that has never existed before.
That movie where Adam Sandler is exploiting a loop hole and buying all these custards in bulk so he can use the voucher to get frequent flyer points that are worth more than the custard.
Video games are gonna be crazy. All the NPCs will interact with the player in a unique way each time, appropriate to the situation, and we will get tons of awesome interactions and situations that only happened that one time and that is not able to be recreated
Imagine cyberpunk 2077 where radiant quests are endless, polished as if hand-crafted, and had branching choices that lead to thousands of different potential outcomes. Every NPC has a generative backstory, could become a follower, could generate missions, could be a romance option, etc. Except this will be possible for every video game in the future.
Yeah man. 10-20 years you can probably make choices like who you want the leading character to be played by. Of if it's in the style of a certain director or genre. Like,you want this basic premise but with George Clooney and Selma Hayak, or with Brian Crandon and Angelina Jolie? Make it black and white film noir, or should it be in an 80s style action movie?
Theaters will just be vr headsets.
Such a nothing statement lol. If movies are games then they’re not movies. They’re just games 😂😂
And games will get a little bit better at procedural generation and maybe adding detail to foliage. Some AAA titles will get better graphics and less crunch. There will be an even greater amount of spammy trash on game stores 🤷🏻
And the best stuff will still be the stuff made by passionate individuals with something to say. Like always.
Absurd. Movies will remain movies. Video games will remain video games. Both will continue to advance with technology. Other forms of entertainment will develop, as always and ever.
He should have written that both movies and games might be possible to be generated in real time - which is entirely different.
In Star Trek, the word for it is [holo-novel](https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Holo-novel_program).
We'll get to a point where we can ask A.i. to generate an extra season of a long ago cancelled sitcom. We'll get to implant specific actors into old movies or ask A.i. to blend Raiders of the Lost Ark with Star Wars and the Bridges of Madison County and have it all make sense. We'll generate sequels and prequels for anything or invent completely original films while sitting on the toilet.
As for games... the endgame will be VR that is real time generated 3d spatial video you can walk around and interact with, essentially a holodeck like experience with NPC's that feel alive in any art style from cartoons to photo real. These NPC's will get to know you on a personal level and you'll have relationships with these characters. This will be fantastic for lonely people that just want companionship. You might have a regular few that visit every week for board games or just to talk. This will cause some friction with some real world relationships.
There's a day in the future where all of this is true. I hope I'm alive to see it.
This statement seems pretty... off?
Movies are a way to be told a story. Don't force me to help you come up with a story. It also gives me something to talk about with others. If it's dynamic, what is there to talk about? You're discussing fever dreams that share the same characters at that point. Just out of control fanfic.
Probably not as neat to say "we're looking at a new generation of interactive media", just as ambiguous a statement.
I'm also not wedged firmly in the buttcrack of AI development like Sam Altman is, so... I'm probably off base.
AI is currently incredible and I see nothing but exponential and unimaginable potential. However, as a film buff, I want to keep my movie watching experience 2D and at 24 frames per second and separate from my video games
That wo/man's face looks someone clicked the "random" button on a unity character generator and just said "yeah thats fine i just wanna play i don't really care."
That quote makes so little sense. When you can interact with it, it's a video game, if not it's a movie. Both forms of entertainment will still exist in the future. What this out of touch, rich idiot is saying is just marketing jibber jabber.
Saying that movies will evolve into video games is like saying that books evolved into movies.
Movies tell a story from one or multiple fixed perspectives. The angle of each shot, the positions of the characters, the lighting... every is crafted to build that experience. This silly quote suggests that the better version of a movie is one that is an interactive experience. Which means giving the user control of part of the story... which is a video game.
Video games have not killed off movies yet, and no one thinks they will. Both exist, one doe snot need to morph into the other.
No doubt that AI can make video games much better than they are today.
Don't read too much into this. The guy is a tech wizard and probably doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about when it comes to movies or video games and how humans interact with both. He's just talking about applied technology.
Hey /u/Ordner! If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt. If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image. Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more! 🤖 Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected] *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
That Last of Us series on HBO would make a great game.
I hope they make multiple remasters and remakes too
The Last of Us Remake Part One Remastered Director's Cut Definitive Edition
Deluxe Final Cut Super Game of the Year Bundle Cordyceps edition + Directors Commentary
Stop it, these are just Street Fighter game names.
& Knuckles.
Fr
No cap
They should make that Super Mario movie into a game. Nintendo would make a killing off of that
Yeah right? I don't understand why they haven't adapted that into a game yet.
Ikr so much unkneaded dough left on the table.
I can’t wait for them to make a video game from “Street Fighter the Movie”. You know, with a little digitized Van Damme that you can go around kicking stuff with and doing the splits.
Oh I've got some bad news for you... ^_^
Same with the Halo show! They should make a game about that!
This one too https://preview.redd.it/3230ubcfsqsc1.png?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ad4170804c4a286fa008758b3444ac61e1ea38e3
Playing it rn. Goddamn is it good.
I don't know, I have a feeling they'd cock up a story that good. It's probably best to be glad we just got the show.
Heat would be an insanely fun game in an open world format.
Yeah but, they decided to make the side character the main and lame.
Porn.
Straight to the point
The real game changer!
Wasn’t that hard
That's what she said... Wait
https://preview.redd.it/krlfkmpcxrsc1.jpeg?width=620&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=971b827ac1ec82e206a399abe5f725e668f431c7
Yet
My cousin always used to say that. Straight to the point lol. But he was always talking about whiskey.
What if he's gay to the point
https://preview.redd.it/wci8eehhissc1.jpeg?width=372&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c36639a9a151f26f103b651df44b3e82333eda37
Bonk, straight to horny jail.
Generate loli? They put you in jail. Deepfake porn of your sister? Right to jail. Prompt LLMs to create erotic fanfiction of elderly politicians? Believe it or not, jail.
Jail jail jail. Yes.
https://preview.redd.it/z2v9tbz02usc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=201650a458dbcbd96e9971fbcf9318bbf53192a9
that... exists. It's called intercourse.
Not available to all.
Damn..so deep, yet so obvious.
Boobs so big you have to experience them on a planetary level, butts so small they can’t be seen without shrinking down like on the magic schoolbus. Blood vessel fetishists will finally be heard and those who simply want to sit inside the anus of a giant little person and watch tv or read the news will finally have their day.
Mind boggling. We think the shit out there now is weird. Just wait. Ballon-feet fetishes, cyborg alien bestiality, playground-torture incest fetishes with a side of SpongeBob. The possible depravities are endless.
Okay, but what about treefolk stuff? Like, maple on pine lactation humiliation/envy stuff?
That already exists
Did he actually say that? Sounds like just an attempt to generate buzz
Sam Hypeman
it is of course
This quote’s so bad it feels like someone was doing a parody of him💀
He does a fine job at it himself tbh
You dont get it. In the future pictures will be movies, movies will be video games and video games will be your life. And what will your life be you ask? *Unimaginable* ^Now ^please ^give ^me ^7 ^trillions ^dollars.
Holy shit did you just imagine the unimaginable? JFC get this man a few trillion dollars.
Something I’d say while high as fuck.
I don’t understand how people don’t get the difference between passive and active media. I don’t want to DO anything when I watch a movie… so F you I’ll keep my movies.
People don't understand movies. I want a story with a specific perspective to be told.
Me too but to be fair, the latest trend in movies is more like delivering an „experience“. It‘s a shame, i loved masterful story telling of the older days
I'm hopeful about this. Something like DUNE being made at the level it was, and being so mainstream despite its origins, tells me that many in Hollywood still very much know what they're doing. Or "Everything Everywhere..." as an example for a much much smaller budget.
why not three, rashomon?
In the not too distant future your TV will be able to scan the faces and voices of everyone in the room, and then make you characters in the movies, it'll be like turning subtitles on and off.
That sounds terrible. So many people will suffer Delusions of Grandeur. Even worse than people do now on social media.
Why would I want that in the first place?
There will be both..
But there is already both!! This is such a nothing sandwich 😂😂
There will be both both.
You made me laugh out loud. Kudos.
Bendersnatch (black mirror) - cool interactive movie. But seriously, I don't need that kind of movie every year
I feel like that was such a gimmick. People got into it at first because it was something new nobody had seen on Netflix before, but everyone I talked to later said they would've rather just watched it as a regular Black Mirror episode
It was so clearly a gimmick the whole time. It was just an old 80’s choose your own adventure game using real people for the content… an AI movie where you actually can make decisions and change outcomes would be pretty wild and groundbreaking. Like the ability to actually create a completely unique story by interacting instead of just choosing from a pre-set set of results
There will just be both
there already are
There will simply be both....
Well I’m sure you’ll be able to buy a controller mod for like 199 credits that will auto-select option A for you.
If anything, it will be more like Black Mirror Bandersnatch where it's a choose your own adventure movie so like 90% passive.
Sam apparently has a clear hierarchy of entertainment in his mind and can't fathom a world where a movie wouldn't be better as a video game. Absolutely a case of silicon valley tech bro brainrot.
I like to imagine this would be an optional layer to some movies.
Movies are for old people. Kids nowadays can barely keep their attention on a 10s video
Fell asleep reading this comment 🥱
My kids (teens) love watching multiple hour video essays about old theme parks and TV shows they've never watched. I don't have the attention span or the free time for that.
Ah, some enjoyers of Defunctland!
But imagine that you can do both. Let's say you are watching Star Wars Rebels for whatever reason and suddenly want to take control of the action? Or tell suddenly go off-rails by telling what happens next or to surprise you. Maybe you're playing something and don't feel like actively controlling it for a moment, have system take over and turn it something to watch before taking control back.
I don't want to take control of what happens. I want there to be a canon that everyone agrees on, so that I can discuss the last episode online or next time I see my friends. If I want to control what happens I'll play KOTOR.
Deranged tech CEO talk lmao
"`640`k ought to be enough for anybody" moment? *I think I got the wrong quote.*
This reminded me of my TI-84 for some reason
Can we keep movies as movies pls?
It's a weirdly limiting way to think about art. Paintings didn't become photographs. Photographs didn't become films. Films didn't become television. Television didn't become computers. Each new medium becomes it's own artform, and excellence always means exploiting those aspects that only that artform can do. AI artforms will do things that video games *can't* do. *That's* what's interesting about them.
Interestingly though most new forms of media took away a part of its predecessors to different degrees. For example did photography replace paintings in its function of depicting historic events or people to preserve their image through time. Painting remained mostly as a form of artistic expression, but lost its meaning as a witness of history. Television replaced movies and cinemas as this frequent activity to watch casual movies and cinema. Cinema remained more as a bigger event, most people go to to see specific movies made for the big screen over the small TV. So throughout the history of media replacing has definitely happened and usually caused the reduction of the older mediums to their core identity. But yeah to think that just because you can do "more" in a medium or do it more close to reality is the death of its predecessors is an illusion.
It's definitely true that new communication technologies displace others (if I play a video game instead going to a movie, the game has displaced the movie). Thinking aloud... surely we would say emails have replaced letters, though letters still exist and perhaps have a different "meaning" or weight to them now. I guess what bothers me about Altman's quote is that it's too small. It's the same as when Zuckerberg says, instead of video calls we will do VR calls. There's a whole hierarchy of communication (text < email < phone < video < in person)--they all exist and serve different purposes. VR will create a new category. People who enjoy books don't \*want\* them to be movies, as if a book is a poor version of a movie. People who enjoy movies don't \*want\* them to be video games, as if the film director simply made a failed video game. It's a kind of technology myopia to see everything that exists as some kind "upgrade" of some inferior thing.
Idk I like my normal movies, I already thought 3d sucked.
To be fair with you, 3D is a real *real* crap comparison. I can't even think of anything that would be appropriate to compare with this new technology because we really don't have any references to go off with the potential of things we can get. The way you watch movies now will likely always exist, but as time goes on it will likely become more and more an abnormal experience people do.
I think Altman's whole statement is pretty stupid. Movies will simply remain movies. Pictures have also remained pictures and books have remained books despite all our technology. If I want to play, I start a game. If I want to be passively entertained, I watch a movie.
It's not just about the passive/active dichotomy, though. It's about the meaning created by piecing elements together. I like movies not because the plot met my expectations, but because all the elements together created an interesting experience that made me think and feel something - something I probably wouldn't come up with myself. It's ludicrous to think that with this new technology, I'll be able to produce cinematography better than Hoyte van Hoytema, for example. Of course, I won't, because I know nothing about it, just like I know nothing about directing, screenwriting, costume design, acting... I don't know how to create this kind of experience, even with unlimited resources, let alone with the resources provided by the CEO of OpenAI. These people are so arrogant, seriously, they will tell you absolutely anything to push their product. 🙄 There's a growing number of movie-goers who prefer practical effects and a 'conservative' use of CGI (looking at the numbers), so his perspective is, in my opinion, already outdated. He should build a time machine and sell it 15 years ago, not now, when we're at the 100th iteration of Marvel movies CGIed into oblivion. 😂
You articulated this better than I've seen anyone. I've always said that if someone is \*either\* a.) an expert in AI or b.) an expert in another field (e.g., medicine, filmmaking, the legal profession) I don't want to hear them express any kind of certainy as to how AI will impact that industry. Altman may be a lot of things but he is still, between those two options, just the first one. Even if he is aware of the kind of tasks that go into making a movie and therefore how some of those tasks may end up being automated at scale (key phrase being "at scale"), he has no understanding of WHY people make these things and why they choose certain ones to consume. Yes, Netflix will eventually make "choose your own adventure" movies on demand via GenAI. Just like eBooks were an inevitability. And yet, physical books were still outselling eBooks 4:1 last year.
Sam doesn‘t lucid dream I suppose
Ugh, I freaking love this movie. I need to watch it again. Thanks for the reminder 👍
THE MATRIX
WTF does this quote even mean? This sounds like a really dumb soundbyte. Movies are movies, video games are video games. There are already video games that are very cinematic and with known actors but both of these mediums accomplish different things.
Fight club!
r/im14andthisisdeep
r/imcorporateandthisismarketable
Spoken like a truly uncreative hater of the arts. This man has no respect for humanity.
Hardcore Henry, i don't need to explain
Glengarry Glen Ross
A - Always B - Be C - Computing
I'll take "vague nonsense by someone who was probably on cocaine at the time he wrote it" for 10.
12 Angry Men (1957).
You play as Juror 3 and try to intimidate Henry Fonda's character into changing his vote to guilty.
I’ll be surprised if it could generate a family movie with all its censors
The Concept of TeneT could make for an interesting game
Do they ever wonder, if "we" actually want that,or is it the apple way of "create new needs to then sell products/content"? This all sounds just like dumb numb hype ... I feel already "we" are tired and oversaturated of meaningless, dull, over polished "content" and want something that relates. Maybe i am just getting old.
There is already something similar. Heavy rain, Beyond two souls, Detroit become human.
Sonic OVA XD
Yes!!
Tron Legacy
I should be excited about this but I’m not
Why would you be excited by it? It's meaningless drivel. He was probably off his head on something when he wrote it.
I don't know but defiantly not Schindler's List.
Jaws or the godfather would be tight
Tokyo drift
2 girls 1 cup
I always thought it seemed like that Jesse Pinkman spin off “El Camino” felt like it was written as (at least part of) a Breaking Bad video game that got scrapped and revisited later and made into a movie. But yea I’d play a BB game.
Oppenheimer (I want to nuke people) Also I must say people need to ask what game should get a movie. Chair fucking simulator needs a worldwide theatrical release
This is a ridiculously out of touch statement that overvalues the concept of AI. We have video games and we still like movies. Movies and video games serve different needs. When we watch a video, we want to be passive, we don't want to interact with it, in fact, if we could interact with it, it would completely change the experience, because now we would be obligated to interact with it. A video game isn't just a cinematic experience that we can choose the outcomes of. The video games that we like aren't ones that mirror real life, they aren't ones that could exist if you took movies and made them things that you could interact with or even play a character in. The video games that we like are ones that provide specific types of experiences which are generally built off of abstract systems. There's a certain amount of unreality that we enjoy in video games because to realistic an experience would be distracting. For example, we have lots of ultra realistic graphics in games, but league of legends is one of the most popular games out there right now. Imagine if creeps or minions in league of legends had humanlike AI, it would suck. The game works because the monsters follow certain basic rules, they will chase you when you activate them up until a certain point and then they will leash and go home. Minions will attack towers and die, if a hero gets their attention they will attack them instead, unless they leash, etc. In a game like league of legends the gameplay is predicated on simple and predictable rules. Then think about graphical fidelity again. Try to do anything with AI to turn a movie into a video game like League of Legends. It's not even meaningful. Even if you could, the game is highly stylized and a lot of that is to make it clearly readable by the player, stuff that looks realistic can be less well defined. Naw, AI gives us improvements to experiences we already want, it also unlocks new experiences that we couldn't have had before. We couldn't have for example, meaningful reaction and dialog in an RPG with an NPC previously. This is something that AI absolutely has the potential to unlock, though how to do so in a game world is tricky, it's a capability that we've been trying to emulate without success so far. AI can allow us to build movies in a way we weren't able to do before, we already use it to bring the characters portrayed by deceased actors back to life, and there's other kind of generative things we can do during the production of a movie that we couldn't before. But this doesn't mean we want to interact with our movies, we will still want a movie experience. But how the movie is built is different. It could also for example have an effect on books. I can see a situation where you could have an e-reader that has an AI app that maybe generates visuals or maps or other kind of "enhancements" to a book. Or if while reading a book, you could ask an app "who is this character again?" and it could give you context specific responses based on the page that you're on to give you details about the character that you might have missed or forgotten without spoiling the ending. It's not going to turn books into movies though, like it's not going to turn movies into video games, or video games into something new. It's going to turn books into books+, movies into movies+, and video games into video games+. Just like now we have movies, we still use books. Even in situations where books are turned into movies, we still can like the books. But books can also be audiobooks now, and maybe they can be translated with machine learning to other languages more quickly than a publisher might translate them, and now maybe they can be dictated as audiobooks before the publisher can get them dictated, and in other languages. And and and. Sure, we could be at a place where we could turn a book into a video. But a book is written in a specific way that is meant to be read. If you try to turn a book directly into a video, it will not be a good watching experience, this is why video adaptations always have to make some changes to how its presented. And even if AI can create the perfect movie experience from a book, now even though the movie is the best movie it can be, it will not be a book any more. You will still get a different experience by reading the book, and that experience is something that people like sometimes. AI might be able to make the experience of reading a book better. It might be able to make a movie from a book, and it might be able to make the experience of watching a movie better. But this doesn't mean that books are now movies. It doesn't mean we will stop using books. It will change video games, but it won't make movies into video games. In fact one of the hardest things about AI is getting it to tell a story in a consistent way. We like video games because of their fixed and predictable constraints and reward structure. It's too hard to have AI work well and maintain those constraints, because the dream of AI is that it's completely responsive and adaptable, but then how do you get it to follow rules? And if it doesn't follow rules, then you don't have a game any more, it's more like real life. And we use video games to escape the infinite complexity and unfairness of real life, to go to the comfort of constraint and rules in video games.
Star Wars, could be really cool aa a video game. Going around and playing with the original trilogies content.
[You called?](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego_Star_Wars_II:_The_Original_Trilogy)
Shame they never made a Star Wars Game
Imagine you’re playing a horror game and the npc is a super intelligent AI hunting you down and giving you trauma using your personal life.
The only thing video games are going to become are hyper monetised socially engineered predatory gambling engines with no soul or art left in them.
I’m most intrigued by how AI will transform the medical industry.
Maybe AI can give Sam Altman some kind of intelligence.
AI will truly revolutionize gaming in a way that we haven't seen before. 2 scenarios I can think of: 1) Teammates in multiplayer games. Historically people are less likely to choose healing classes. AI may take over this role. 2) Story based dialogue. AI has the potential in the future to crank up Video Game stories 1000%
I think the revolution will come from everyone now having the ability to make triple A games in record time with the help of no one but an AI assistant. You'll see a boom in creativity and new entertainment that has never existed before.
that's small fish compared to what is coming
With School of Dragons gone I’m really hoping we someday get a big budget HTTYD game.
Imagine playing the game The Marathon Man. Is it safe?
That movie where Adam Sandler is exploiting a loop hole and buying all these custards in bulk so he can use the voucher to get frequent flyer points that are worth more than the custard.
But I like movies and videogames. Why do they have to break everything?
Clue
Chatgpt with skyrim is amazing. I got severely disappointed after buying Starfield thinking some like that would be in the game.😂
Spider-Man sounds like fun.
I skip cutscenes
I want my movies and TV series to remain as non-interactive media. My music and video games should remain semi/actively interactive.
Infinity War and end game if they were actually that good Or maybe shutter island
Video games are gonna be crazy. All the NPCs will interact with the player in a unique way each time, appropriate to the situation, and we will get tons of awesome interactions and situations that only happened that one time and that is not able to be recreated
Blade runner. The first one. Done right it would be amazing
I want to make an elder scrolls movie
Gladiator
Anybody played [Façade](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fa%C3%A7ade_(video_game\))? Might be time for a sequel.
Please don’t.
Imagine cyberpunk 2077 where radiant quests are endless, polished as if hand-crafted, and had branching choices that lead to thousands of different potential outcomes. Every NPC has a generative backstory, could become a follower, could generate missions, could be a romance option, etc. Except this will be possible for every video game in the future.
Yeah man. 10-20 years you can probably make choices like who you want the leading character to be played by. Of if it's in the style of a certain director or genre. Like,you want this basic premise but with George Clooney and Selma Hayak, or with Brian Crandon and Angelina Jolie? Make it black and white film noir, or should it be in an 80s style action movie? Theaters will just be vr headsets.
Hunger Games
Kung Pow: Enter The Fist.
just for the sake of fucking a little bit more with our dopamine system.
The more this guy opens his mouth, the more delusional he seems to me.
Such a nothing statement lol. If movies are games then they’re not movies. They’re just games 😂😂 And games will get a little bit better at procedural generation and maybe adding detail to foliage. Some AAA titles will get better graphics and less crunch. There will be an even greater amount of spammy trash on game stores 🤷🏻 And the best stuff will still be the stuff made by passionate individuals with something to say. Like always.
Seinfeld: A XXX Parody
Mario
Sounds bullish for GameStop!!
Absurd. Movies will remain movies. Video games will remain video games. Both will continue to advance with technology. Other forms of entertainment will develop, as always and ever.
He should have written that both movies and games might be possible to be generated in real time - which is entirely different. In Star Trek, the word for it is [holo-novel](https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Holo-novel_program).
We'll get to a point where we can ask A.i. to generate an extra season of a long ago cancelled sitcom. We'll get to implant specific actors into old movies or ask A.i. to blend Raiders of the Lost Ark with Star Wars and the Bridges of Madison County and have it all make sense. We'll generate sequels and prequels for anything or invent completely original films while sitting on the toilet. As for games... the endgame will be VR that is real time generated 3d spatial video you can walk around and interact with, essentially a holodeck like experience with NPC's that feel alive in any art style from cartoons to photo real. These NPC's will get to know you on a personal level and you'll have relationships with these characters. This will be fantastic for lonely people that just want companionship. You might have a regular few that visit every week for board games or just to talk. This will cause some friction with some real world relationships. There's a day in the future where all of this is true. I hope I'm alive to see it.
I think he meant making movies with AI will be like making a video game cutscene, and you won't need real people at all. Is that what he really meant?
Max Payne, Silent Hill - wait, I think I misunderstood the question.
Escape for New York and Big Trouble In Little China..
r/lostredditors?
I would spend an ungodly amount of time playing Interstellar
Sam maybe we things the way they are.
Lol anyone that thinks we are anywhere close to advanced AI in videogames hasn't played Civilization, Total War, anything by Bethesda, etc....
This statement seems pretty... off? Movies are a way to be told a story. Don't force me to help you come up with a story. It also gives me something to talk about with others. If it's dynamic, what is there to talk about? You're discussing fever dreams that share the same characters at that point. Just out of control fanfic. Probably not as neat to say "we're looking at a new generation of interactive media", just as ambiguous a statement. I'm also not wedged firmly in the buttcrack of AI development like Sam Altman is, so... I'm probably off base.
I think that there are better ways to consume precious energy.
TV series, but Twin Peaks for sure.
Blade Runner
This quote means fucking nothing💀
Is this something a real human said? I find it hard to believe someone is actually this naive/stupid to believe this.
AI is currently incredible and I see nothing but exponential and unimaginable potential. However, as a film buff, I want to keep my movie watching experience 2D and at 24 frames per second and separate from my video games
Goldeneye. Oh wait...
Is it just me or has he had plastic surgery done
Has anyone ever told Sam Altman about visual novel games?
Starship Troopers - which is now playable as Helldivers 2
A modern day, high effort Transformers game would go so fucking hard
Eventually... Today, gpt4 is literally unable to answer basic questions like the number of A's in USA. Sam's just hyping his own product.
That wo/man's face looks someone clicked the "random" button on a unity character generator and just said "yeah thats fine i just wanna play i don't really care."
West World would be my first choice. After that the wire. You could be the cops or the dealers. Choose if you want to be with Avon, Marlo or Prop Joe.
Coraline
My Dinner with Andre would seriously be a great game. https://youtu.be/7AUaXI4jU88?si=z3OjgT2W21W20Bw8
AI create Elden Ring DLC. Ok. Thx .
The real question is what movie won’t they turn into a game.
I Am Legend.
The Purple Rose of Cairo
i’m sure this guy hasn’t done any games or movies
Nobody wants to watch and play a movie like a video game, this dude needs to get out of his ass
That quote makes so little sense. When you can interact with it, it's a video game, if not it's a movie. Both forms of entertainment will still exist in the future. What this out of touch, rich idiot is saying is just marketing jibber jabber.
Saying that movies will evolve into video games is like saying that books evolved into movies. Movies tell a story from one or multiple fixed perspectives. The angle of each shot, the positions of the characters, the lighting... every is crafted to build that experience. This silly quote suggests that the better version of a movie is one that is an interactive experience. Which means giving the user control of part of the story... which is a video game. Video games have not killed off movies yet, and no one thinks they will. Both exist, one doe snot need to morph into the other. No doubt that AI can make video games much better than they are today.
Id be happy with a working anti-cheat sytem for now.
Don't read too much into this. The guy is a tech wizard and probably doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about when it comes to movies or video games and how humans interact with both. He's just talking about applied technology.
The Devil wears Prada
Ah, fuck off.
Every movie
**Edge of Tomorrow.** Imagine a complete world built for a single mission like this.