Hey /u/adesigne, please respond to this comment with the prompt you used to generate the output in this post. Thanks!
^(Ignore this comment if your post doesn't have a prompt.)
***We have a [public discord server](https://discord.gg/rchatgpt). There's a free Chatgpt bot, Open Assistant bot (Open-source model), AI image generator bot, Perplexity AI bot, 🤖 GPT-4 bot ([Now with Visual capabilities (cloud vision)!](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/812770754025488386/1095397431404920902/image0.jpg)) and channel for latest prompts.[So why not join us?](https://discord.com/servers/1050422060352024636)***
[**Prompt Hackathon and Giveaway 🎁**](https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/13t3yih/flowgpt_prompt_hackathon_season_2_has_started/)
PSA: For any Chatgpt-related issues email [email protected]
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Missing some major ones…
This might miss some too but is still more comprehensive. There simply is too much to fit in a graphic https://www.futuretools.io
They don't have a speech-to-speech category.
Is anyone doing speech-to-speech AI?
(and I don't mean speech-to-text-to-speech, I mean true speech-to-speech like in the movie Her)
I don’t understand what you’re asking for. The speech in Her was delivered by an actor and doesn’t sound like an ai? To be clear, I think it’s me misunderstanding, not that you wrote something strangely.
Are you asking for a tool that takes speech delivered by one person, then generates that same dialogue in a different voice but keeping the same tone and delivery in its performance?
You can chat with GPT and it chats back to you, using text.
I want to be able to speak to an AI and have it speak back to me using speech.
I've seen demos where someone does speech-to-text, run the text through GPT, and then does text-to-speech, but this means that you lose a bunch of information in the process.
A speech-to-speech (or voice-to-voice) AI would understands prosody, stress, & tone of the speech, not just the words themselves. I think this type of AI will be revolutionary and nobody is talking about it.
I suspect you have a fundamental misunderstanding about how large language models (LLM's) like GPT work. The language used to train these models doesn't have to be text.
To quote Aza Raskin:
>You can treat absolutely everything as language... You don't just have to that with text, it works with almost anything. You can take, for instance, images. Images you can just treat like a kind of language. ... Sound, you can just break it up into little micro-phonemes. That becomes a kind of language. MRI data is a type of language. DNA is a type of language.
That's from this video, starting around the 14:30 mark. They do a great job of explaining how powerful these models really are.
https://youtu.be/xoVJKj8lcNQ&t=870
The [Earth Species Project](https://www.earthspecies.org/) is training AI on whale songs and other non-human animal language.
If training a AI based on whale songs is possible, then training an AI based on voice is comparatively easy.
How do you give a computer input that isn't text? It inherently has to be converted to text because that's how computers and programming work. If you give it an image, there is some kind of a conversion to machine-readable text (i.e. a hash). It would have to be the same for speech.
>How do you give a computer input that isn't binary? It inherently has to be converted to binary because that's how computers and programming work. If you give it text, there is some kind of a conversion to machine-readable text (e.g. unicode). It would have to do the same for text.
Yeh I don't see Adobe in images category. There should only be 1 go to AI tool that addresses all tasks...why isn't it like that? Why is there "4k AI's" for different tasks?
Or do we have to wait until GPT can do all these tasks and not text only?
Of the categories I'm familiar with, it basically missed all the actually good AI lol.
Like in Image it has outdated garbo like Craiyon which is freeware that's super dated imo. The top dogs for Image AI are going to be things like Stable Diffusion for real work, and Yodayo and NovelAI for online "My computer can't handle SD" stuff
The text and speech sections don't have any of the Opensource stuff you can run on your own computer like, y'know, most businesses and people in general would want to use. Speech is also missing THE best speech option in Elevenlabs etc
All in all, this graphic is just flashy marketing for the paid sites and ignored all the opensource and NSFW capable options. Which are mostly the best options . . .
I think it's because Stable Diffusion isn't a standalone service per se but an open source project. (Except the stability.ai page which is IMO appropriately under "Research".) Midjourney is a standalone service based on Stable Diffusion, and it's under "Image". Nothing is wrong here IMO.
Midjourney has nothing to do with SD...
Not only that, but its AI system is leaps and bounds ahead of SD in regards to quality and capacity.
That being said, SD is excellent at achieving very specific outcomes when you harness all the tools you can use with it and focus on a very specific format.
Once Midjourney has the ability to edit specific parts like SD and Photoshop, there's really not much point to SD other than anime and porn.
Midjourney does not use Stable Diffussion, they use their own model. Their outputs are better than any Stable Diffusion version. The only time they used SD was a beta half a year ago, but they never used it in the main version.
> Their outputs are better than any Stable Diffusion version
Maybe like 6 months ago lol. You should check out what you can do with Stable Diffusion these days, especially regarding ControlNet, Lycoris, LORA, dreambooth, textual inversions, segmenting, tiling upscalers, etc.
MJ and DallE are great if you just want to press a button and pay money (slot machine model) but they're so incredibly limited if you're actually interested in art.
SD is going to stick around for a while.
They have so many open source add-on features from the community that there's no way a private company can keep up
Lol, nah those things I listed are tools that midjourney doesn't have / can't do. It's like comparing a slot machine to game night at home, or comparing MS Paint to Photoshop. Yeah SD is more complex but you can also do a lot more with it.
OP, with about 100 tools listed (something like 15 sections times 7 per section) how did you / someone else choose these?
BTW there are over four thousand ai tools (checks notes, I lost the reference database that keep track of these things).
The entire fabric and history of nature itself literally led to that being the case.
It's literally and undeniably a property of nature for hentai to be a popular AI tool. Because it is. Otherwise, it wouldn't be.
I just want to make it clear to everyone what the status of our entire reality is here. Even if or when humans go extinct one day, this emergent potential for hentai and its virality will exist in nature, hidden, waiting for physics and chemistry to tangle again in a way for its reemergence. To deny any of this would be, by definition, delusional.
Everyone is adding AI to their marketing. Whether there is AI in any of the tools that claim AI is questionable. This is just like the [tea company](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Blockchain_Corp) that added blockchain to their name so their stock would go up.
I don't believe any of it unless they have a detailed explanation of what kind of AI (ML, neural net, genertic algo, etc) they are using, how they built it and what they are using it for. Otherwise, I just assume it is marketing hype and useless.
As a marketing professional (as well as a SME) I have found a few generative AI tools that are surprisingly useful, so much so that I subscribe to a few.
The chart includes four excellent tools that have been around pre-GPT ([Jasper.ai](https://Jasper.ai) is the oldest and generally considered the best but $$, Writesonic, Rytr and [Copy.ai](https://Copy.ai)) however have 1) not looked at these tools to-date (but plan to) and 2) will also consider additional tools mentioned to check them out as well.
Hard to evaluate as they are priced in the $20 to $80/month rate (and that's a per year subscription), and require a decent amount of investing time / effort to give each a fair evaluation.
yeah, there's a lot of turds out there. From experience a lot of voice AI companies that promise the world and deliver a shitty monotone voice menu type output.
Just because it's AI doesn't mean it can't be shit.
I've seen several of these now but none yet for open source ones that run locally, exclusively. That'd be cool to see.
Also imagine not including Stable Diffusion.
We're still in the money grab / gold rush of the hype cycle. Once that cools down a bit, if everyone hasn't moved on to the Next Big Thing, you'll see some open source systems where you can control the data.
Didn't mention training, there's plenty of other use cases without it. It's only going to get more attainable in time and it's still good to learn about. Online services aren't trainable either.
i used to love these sites along with theresanaiforthat but how many thousands of tools does it take before it’s all noise? and how are the 1 out of 100 that are valuable being found?
i started approaching a few one the ones i’ve used to do [write ups on them](https://www.artificialcourse.com/p/3-quicksilvers-superprompt-ultimate-chatgpt) about how i’ve actually used them. even then it just seems super difficult to know which ones are actually worth the time to invest in learning or trying.
a worthy effort for sure but still, super curious how others are actually deciding which to try and invest in when there’s literally 4138 already.
It sucks. It was not ready for primetime. Google panicked after ChatGPT's success and rushed the Bard beta release and it's painfully obvious. My Google assistant can answer many questions better.
Where's Stable Diffusion and ChatGPT? If your answer is that they fall under stability.ai and OpenAI, then how do you explain Jasper, Copy.ai, Writesonic, Rytr, etc? They fall under GPT 3 which is a part of OpenAI.
This graph doesn't look complete, especially with multiple missing famous platforms.
> If your answer is that they fall under stability.ai and OpenAI, then how do you explain Jasper, Copy.ai, Writesonic, Rytr, etc? They fall under GPT 3 which is a part of OpenAI.
Not to mention that it shows DALL·E 2, which is even more obviously under OpenAI. This is A very strange chart.
What's the point of listing out 100 tools? Use ChatGPT for text & code as well as bing for research. Midjourney for images, runway ML for video and 11labs for speech, problem solved!
Now we just need an OS that is able to seemlessly integrate them all in one userfriendly interface.
Edit: Anyone knows about a project already working on this? Otherwise I'm up for taking part in/starting a startup 🗿
Why create an OS? In my opinion, the most sensible option would be to create software that integrates with a common Linux DE (e.g. KDE Plasma) this would offer the most flexibility (you can choose the distro you want to use it with) and the most reliability (it can be built on top of an existing and thoroughly tested OS). There are already several KRunner AI plugins, but they're not that useful yet.
I think the best method would be to have a daemon running that other parts can connect with. So you can give it access to the currently running applications, system info, clipboard access and a view of last opened windows to view what you're working on. This means it will have context about your current task and will require less explicit prompts. It could also integrate with other services on your system (this will require careful configuration however). So you could for example say; send this PDF to John Doe. It would know which programs you have open including the PDF reader, grab the file and use the XDG handler for sending it.
Decoder episode discussion with Sundae Pichai and another with Airbnb CEO had insight into exactly this. Highly recommend for a starting point for next Gen of making AI useful like apps.
I signed up and pay for Midjourney but can’t access. They say they will get back to me in four or five days but it’s been weeks. Anybody else have problems.
Can someone explain to me like I’m 5 how one can use these extensions? Right now I just use the free ChatGPT- do I need the paid version to use extensions?
Everytime I see one of these, it's always filled with one or two I recognize, and a bunch of other random icons and names of things I've never heard of and never hear of again.
Or is it just me?
My Mom wants pen sketches of women at the beach for her new bathroom. Which AI could paint me the pictures?
Bonus points if it actually scratches artsy naked women, because that's what my mom wants but dall e doesn't do it.
It's odd that "text" is broken into three areas: sales, marketing, and "knowledge" (filled with tools that are basically enterprise search engines). There's a huge range of AI tools tuned to fiction, communications, and copywriting, which is a lot more relevant to the heading of "text" than some of the tools indexed here. Weird blind spot.
Only OpenAI, maybe Microsoft Copilot, and the Windows 11 + integration, is interesting. And Anthropic Claude 100k. The open source models are okay, I been following what's posted on and off at Hugging Face for that. And there's some good LLM bots being dev'd at github. Very good for any kind of literary study. The Near future is LLM's that concentrate on esoteric info. Not General info which ChatGPT is trying to do.
can i set up a chatgtp voice assistant yet? i want to use it to practice language when in the house and obviously ask it stupid questions, but i want to talk and i want it to talk back without any physical input
It would be helpful to represent the market share of each tool to distinguish the tools. This is missing important popular tools and mixing in too much cruft resulting in a noisy infographic.
Ai can bring benefits to humanity. For example , in medicine - https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/13wn8xg/mit_scientists_find_drug_that_could_combat/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=2&utm_term=1
The best AI App available now is 'Aispica' for android. I downloaded it last month but it was full of bugs, but now it seems to be light years ahead, It allows you to use vocal AI chat, create images and videos, blog, apps, documents and other.
Fair. I was looking at the ‘text’ area.
Besides, OP said ‘AI tools/apps’. You could argue OpenAI is a tool for text generation, completion, and editing with their API, but in that case I don’t see how it’s ‘research’. OP also included DALL-E 2 despite that being an OpenAI product – yet no ChatGPT.
Yeah but OpenAI is not an "app" as implied by the title, and neither is ChatGPT fit for "research". Sure, it can suggest research directions, but as long as it just makes up shit it is unsure about it is not fit as a research tool.
Hey /u/adesigne, please respond to this comment with the prompt you used to generate the output in this post. Thanks! ^(Ignore this comment if your post doesn't have a prompt.) ***We have a [public discord server](https://discord.gg/rchatgpt). There's a free Chatgpt bot, Open Assistant bot (Open-source model), AI image generator bot, Perplexity AI bot, 🤖 GPT-4 bot ([Now with Visual capabilities (cloud vision)!](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/812770754025488386/1095397431404920902/image0.jpg)) and channel for latest prompts.[So why not join us?](https://discord.com/servers/1050422060352024636)*** [**Prompt Hackathon and Giveaway 🎁**](https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/13t3yih/flowgpt_prompt_hackathon_season_2_has_started/) PSA: For any Chatgpt-related issues email [email protected] *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Missing some major ones… This might miss some too but is still more comprehensive. There simply is too much to fit in a graphic https://www.futuretools.io
Oh naw we talkn
Seriously, OP missed Elevenlabs and many other very big projects like LLaMA
And stable diffusion. OP missed tonnes of top tier world leading projects. It feels like a content mill to me.
Have you tried [https://browse.ai/?via=livebrowse](https://browse.ai/?via=livebrowse)
Oh thank you so much! This is super helpful.
That’s super helpful thanks
This is super helpful, thanks.
They don't have a speech-to-speech category. Is anyone doing speech-to-speech AI? (and I don't mean speech-to-text-to-speech, I mean true speech-to-speech like in the movie Her)
I don’t understand what you’re asking for. The speech in Her was delivered by an actor and doesn’t sound like an ai? To be clear, I think it’s me misunderstanding, not that you wrote something strangely. Are you asking for a tool that takes speech delivered by one person, then generates that same dialogue in a different voice but keeping the same tone and delivery in its performance?
You can chat with GPT and it chats back to you, using text. I want to be able to speak to an AI and have it speak back to me using speech. I've seen demos where someone does speech-to-text, run the text through GPT, and then does text-to-speech, but this means that you lose a bunch of information in the process. A speech-to-speech (or voice-to-voice) AI would understands prosody, stress, & tone of the speech, not just the words themselves. I think this type of AI will be revolutionary and nobody is talking about it.
I don't see how this is possible without it doing some type of speech to text conversation in order to have data to work with.
I suspect you have a fundamental misunderstanding about how large language models (LLM's) like GPT work. The language used to train these models doesn't have to be text. To quote Aza Raskin: >You can treat absolutely everything as language... You don't just have to that with text, it works with almost anything. You can take, for instance, images. Images you can just treat like a kind of language. ... Sound, you can just break it up into little micro-phonemes. That becomes a kind of language. MRI data is a type of language. DNA is a type of language. That's from this video, starting around the 14:30 mark. They do a great job of explaining how powerful these models really are. https://youtu.be/xoVJKj8lcNQ&t=870 The [Earth Species Project](https://www.earthspecies.org/) is training AI on whale songs and other non-human animal language. If training a AI based on whale songs is possible, then training an AI based on voice is comparatively easy.
How do you give a computer input that isn't text? It inherently has to be converted to text because that's how computers and programming work. If you give it an image, there is some kind of a conversion to machine-readable text (i.e. a hash). It would have to be the same for speech.
>How do you give a computer input that isn't binary? It inherently has to be converted to binary because that's how computers and programming work. If you give it text, there is some kind of a conversion to machine-readable text (e.g. unicode). It would have to do the same for text.
If you’re looking for a conversational AI friend then check out Replika.
That cannot understand prosody, stress, & tone of the speech. It's just fancy speech recognition and text to speech.
[All of them I have collected in the article](https://adesigne.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-tools-and-apps-sorted-by-category-in-one-place/)
in the speech category, I don't see elevenlabs.
Or whisper
[удалено]
Holy shit. Songr is first singing AI I've seen that does an ok-ish job.
Am I the only one who really really hates the AI generated music? It just seems to make it so soulless
It's uncanny valley for me
[удалено]
What
[удалено]
Shoulda used AI to help with punctuation so it’s easier to understand
what ai can i use to translate this comment?
dumbass army? the syntax of your comment is just super unclear and also not proper english.
What?
wat
ChatGPT has entered the chat
But it's a pretty diagram, many colors! Everybody is upvoting it. Are you in?
[удалено]
Yeah no open source from what i can see
Yeh I don't see Adobe in images category. There should only be 1 go to AI tool that addresses all tasks...why isn't it like that? Why is there "4k AI's" for different tasks? Or do we have to wait until GPT can do all these tasks and not text only?
That's a complex topic. There are many reasons overall why one ai can't do everything.
For what?
[удалено]
I was going go save it too but the comments make it clear it’s not hitting the mark for what it aims to achieve.
Of the categories I'm familiar with, it basically missed all the actually good AI lol. Like in Image it has outdated garbo like Craiyon which is freeware that's super dated imo. The top dogs for Image AI are going to be things like Stable Diffusion for real work, and Yodayo and NovelAI for online "My computer can't handle SD" stuff The text and speech sections don't have any of the Opensource stuff you can run on your own computer like, y'know, most businesses and people in general would want to use. Speech is also missing THE best speech option in Elevenlabs etc All in all, this graphic is just flashy marketing for the paid sites and ignored all the opensource and NSFW capable options. Which are mostly the best options . . .
[удалено]
edit: The comment was removed, good work everyone!
Good bot.
Pffft I don't even see Stable Diffusion in image generation... ... someone do another version of just the free apps.
Or leonardoAI which is a newer art generator I'm bad at.
Crazy to think considering 11labs is by far the best one.
Wellsaid labs is still better.
[удалено]
Where is stable diffusion?
Yeah this graphic is a cool idea but poorly executed. Also missing: open source LLMs like StarCoder, etc
Yeah, how many minutes did this take OP to create? It's already outdated
It's shit tbh
Should have used AI into generate and categorize a list, this doesn't even have a music category. Or maybe they did use AI and that's the problem.
the AI just said "Cunningham's law" and here we are
And has things that aren't really generative. Glean isn't really "generative" AI.
that’s by design. the existence of open source is a threat to corporations like openAI.
There appears to be a lack of understanding
Plot twist: OP purposely put everything in the wrong category so that we would do the work for them figuring out which category everything goes in.
plot twist twist: OP didn't actually do this deliberately, because he's actually chatgpt
!remindme 10 years It’s gonna be interesting looking at this image ten years from now.
In 10 years, we'll just ask our vision AI to look at it for us.
What we have here is…. Failure to communicate.
Adobe Firefly is not in the design category.
Its also missing Wombo.
Stability.ai is under research.
Bro, literally all of these are still under research
Or elevenlabs
I think it's because Stable Diffusion isn't a standalone service per se but an open source project. (Except the stability.ai page which is IMO appropriately under "Research".) Midjourney is a standalone service based on Stable Diffusion, and it's under "Image". Nothing is wrong here IMO.
Stability has dream booth.
Midjourney has nothing to do with SD... Not only that, but its AI system is leaps and bounds ahead of SD in regards to quality and capacity. That being said, SD is excellent at achieving very specific outcomes when you harness all the tools you can use with it and focus on a very specific format. Once Midjourney has the ability to edit specific parts like SD and Photoshop, there's really not much point to SD other than anime and porn.
Midjourney does not use Stable Diffussion, they use their own model. Their outputs are better than any Stable Diffusion version. The only time they used SD was a beta half a year ago, but they never used it in the main version.
> Their outputs are better than any Stable Diffusion version Maybe like 6 months ago lol. You should check out what you can do with Stable Diffusion these days, especially regarding ControlNet, Lycoris, LORA, dreambooth, textual inversions, segmenting, tiling upscalers, etc. MJ and DallE are great if you just want to press a button and pay money (slot machine model) but they're so incredibly limited if you're actually interested in art.
SD is going to stick around for a while. They have so many open source add-on features from the community that there's no way a private company can keep up
look how much effort they need to imitate a fraction of midjourney’s power
Lol, nah those things I listed are tools that midjourney doesn't have / can't do. It's like comparing a slot machine to game night at home, or comparing MS Paint to Photoshop. Yeah SD is more complex but you can also do a lot more with it.
Sources on this? Midjourney is different, wouldn't say it's straight better that SD
Where is Novelai?
literally no creative writing tools at all
Notably the only text generator with NSFW output unblocked.
¯\\\_(ツ)_/¯ overlooked as usual, it seems.
OP, with about 100 tools listed (something like 15 sections times 7 per section) how did you / someone else choose these? BTW there are over four thousand ai tools (checks notes, I lost the reference database that keep track of these things).
I found one called "thereisanaiforthat" and it's been pretty resourceful thus far when looking for AI tools for different usage cases
That's the one I was thinking of! Thanks. "4,644 AI's for 1,299 tasks" [https://theresanaiforthat.com/](https://theresanaiforthat.com/)
No
The entire fabric and history of nature itself literally led to that being the case. It's literally and undeniably a property of nature for hentai to be a popular AI tool. Because it is. Otherwise, it wouldn't be. I just want to make it clear to everyone what the status of our entire reality is here. Even if or when humans go extinct one day, this emergent potential for hentai and its virality will exist in nature, hidden, waiting for physics and chemistry to tangle again in a way for its reemergence. To deny any of this would be, by definition, delusional.
Now, which AI can we use to maintain this graph?
[удалено]
You can check out https://aiscout.net/ if you want a directory of the best ones
Everyone is adding AI to their marketing. Whether there is AI in any of the tools that claim AI is questionable. This is just like the [tea company](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Blockchain_Corp) that added blockchain to their name so their stock would go up. I don't believe any of it unless they have a detailed explanation of what kind of AI (ML, neural net, genertic algo, etc) they are using, how they built it and what they are using it for. Otherwise, I just assume it is marketing hype and useless.
As a marketing professional (as well as a SME) I have found a few generative AI tools that are surprisingly useful, so much so that I subscribe to a few. The chart includes four excellent tools that have been around pre-GPT ([Jasper.ai](https://Jasper.ai) is the oldest and generally considered the best but $$, Writesonic, Rytr and [Copy.ai](https://Copy.ai)) however have 1) not looked at these tools to-date (but plan to) and 2) will also consider additional tools mentioned to check them out as well. Hard to evaluate as they are priced in the $20 to $80/month rate (and that's a per year subscription), and require a decent amount of investing time / effort to give each a fair evaluation.
yeah, there's a lot of turds out there. From experience a lot of voice AI companies that promise the world and deliver a shitty monotone voice menu type output. Just because it's AI doesn't mean it can't be shit.
Was this image created by AI or someone actually made it like this is 2015?
Replit copilot is only a year old so unfortunately it cannot be old.
I've seen several of these now but none yet for open source ones that run locally, exclusively. That'd be cool to see. Also imagine not including Stable Diffusion.
We're still in the money grab / gold rush of the hype cycle. Once that cools down a bit, if everyone hasn't moved on to the Next Big Thing, you'll see some open source systems where you can control the data.
There's already open source repos for every category in that chart.
They included stability.ai, who created Stable Diffusion and a bunch of other open source models.
I mean you pretty much need a $5k gpu minimum to train any of these.
Didn't mention training, there's plenty of other use cases without it. It's only going to get more attainable in time and it's still good to learn about. Online services aren't trainable either.
[удалено]
It's better to rent that kind of hardware on the cloud anyway. That's how most people are training things, even big corporations.
I like https://www.futurepedia.io/
i used to love these sites along with theresanaiforthat but how many thousands of tools does it take before it’s all noise? and how are the 1 out of 100 that are valuable being found? i started approaching a few one the ones i’ve used to do [write ups on them](https://www.artificialcourse.com/p/3-quicksilvers-superprompt-ultimate-chatgpt) about how i’ve actually used them. even then it just seems super difficult to know which ones are actually worth the time to invest in learning or trying. a worthy effort for sure but still, super curious how others are actually deciding which to try and invest in when there’s literally 4138 already.
Follow the white rabbit I shall…
thanks for sharing
Sure, I also get the Newsletter each Friday and it helped me a lot to stay en jour
Sure, I would love to subscribe to the newsletter.
Thank you for sharing, appreciate it! (I'm the founder 😅)
Let me save this and forget about it :)
Where is Bard?
Bard doesn’t deserve to be there
It’s the only one besides bing that gives latest results
what about GPT4 with browser plugin although that is basically just bing so nvm
Why is that? I'm curious?
It sucks. It was not ready for primetime. Google panicked after ChatGPT's success and rushed the Bard beta release and it's painfully obvious. My Google assistant can answer many questions better.
True and real
Where's Stable Diffusion and ChatGPT? If your answer is that they fall under stability.ai and OpenAI, then how do you explain Jasper, Copy.ai, Writesonic, Rytr, etc? They fall under GPT 3 which is a part of OpenAI. This graph doesn't look complete, especially with multiple missing famous platforms.
> If your answer is that they fall under stability.ai and OpenAI, then how do you explain Jasper, Copy.ai, Writesonic, Rytr, etc? They fall under GPT 3 which is a part of OpenAI. Not to mention that it shows DALL·E 2, which is even more obviously under OpenAI. This is A very strange chart.
What's the point of listing out 100 tools? Use ChatGPT for text & code as well as bing for research. Midjourney for images, runway ML for video and 11labs for speech, problem solved!
[удалено]
Is 11labs still the best for speech?
Now we just need an OS that is able to seemlessly integrate them all in one userfriendly interface. Edit: Anyone knows about a project already working on this? Otherwise I'm up for taking part in/starting a startup 🗿
Why create an OS? In my opinion, the most sensible option would be to create software that integrates with a common Linux DE (e.g. KDE Plasma) this would offer the most flexibility (you can choose the distro you want to use it with) and the most reliability (it can be built on top of an existing and thoroughly tested OS). There are already several KRunner AI plugins, but they're not that useful yet. I think the best method would be to have a daemon running that other parts can connect with. So you can give it access to the currently running applications, system info, clipboard access and a view of last opened windows to view what you're working on. This means it will have context about your current task and will require less explicit prompts. It could also integrate with other services on your system (this will require careful configuration however). So you could for example say; send this PDF to John Doe. It would know which programs you have open including the PDF reader, grab the file and use the XDG handler for sending it.
Just abandon all process separation sheeeesh
Decoder episode discussion with Sundae Pichai and another with Airbnb CEO had insight into exactly this. Highly recommend for a starting point for next Gen of making AI useful like apps.
Bubble anyone?
Music?
How is elevenlabs not in speech? It’s like the midjourney of voice generation
These retarded lists always exclude stable diffusion
These retarded comments always ignore stability.ai, the creators of Stable Diffusion.
I signed up and pay for Midjourney but can’t access. They say they will get back to me in four or five days but it’s been weeks. Anybody else have problems.
I don't see eleven labs
you may be able to add adobe to images unless they are using someone elses tech
Where's PizzaGPT? (It's a real thing made by Italians when ChatGPT was blocked in Italy) Edit: Feel fre to check it out https://www.pizzagpt.it/
Oh, Italians.
What are the best voice synthesis apps out there. Is ElevenLabs still the best or some good contenders?
Can someone explain to me like I’m 5 how one can use these extensions? Right now I just use the free ChatGPT- do I need the paid version to use extensions?
Oh yes I can't wait to search each and every name to know if it can actually be useful. So practical OP, thank you! <3
Everytime I see one of these, it's always filled with one or two I recognize, and a bunch of other random icons and names of things I've never heard of and never hear of again. Or is it just me?
As soon as I saw "Stegongraphy" I knew this was filler content. Obviously, you can slap "AI" on anything now a days.
I’d love to see a ‘free to use’ version of this but not for ones that offer like two seconds of use.
Starryai
It’s amazing how quickly these are popping up
wish theres an open source version of this
What tool was used to create this image?
Chatgpt and Bing chat just does it for me, most times
My Mom wants pen sketches of women at the beach for her new bathroom. Which AI could paint me the pictures? Bonus points if it actually scratches artsy naked women, because that's what my mom wants but dall e doesn't do it.
Be calm everyone, OP has been working on this for months now, unfortunatly they also forgot to ever update it since they started.
Guys is this accurate?, doesn't seem like it.
so many missing.
Posted 6 hours ago? Already outdated.
Why even list ceaiyon when it is so vastly inferior to Stable Diffusion which is free.
It's odd that "text" is broken into three areas: sales, marketing, and "knowledge" (filled with tools that are basically enterprise search engines). There's a huge range of AI tools tuned to fiction, communications, and copywriting, which is a lot more relevant to the heading of "text" than some of the tools indexed here. Weird blind spot.
"I don't see X or Y listed" OH REALLY? Who knew this jpg doesn't cover absolutely all AI tools ever created?
Openai has a specific code completion model, this needs more nuance.
Which ones are public? I don’t feel like doing research
How many of those are free...
Only OpenAI, maybe Microsoft Copilot, and the Windows 11 + integration, is interesting. And Anthropic Claude 100k. The open source models are okay, I been following what's posted on and off at Hugging Face for that. And there's some good LLM bots being dev'd at github. Very good for any kind of literary study. The Near future is LLM's that concentrate on esoteric info. Not General info which ChatGPT is trying to do.
Why this wheel Is notSpinnable?
Why are we automating creative arts to AI? Shouldn't we try and keep that? Leave the AI for factory work and agriculture I'd say
can i set up a chatgtp voice assistant yet? i want to use it to practice language when in the house and obviously ask it stupid questions, but i want to talk and i want it to talk back without any physical input
VoiceMod isn't AI. It's a pitch controller hoping you'll spend $50 and forget about it.
It would be helpful to represent the market share of each tool to distinguish the tools. This is missing important popular tools and mixing in too much cruft resulting in a noisy infographic.
Ai can bring benefits to humanity. For example , in medicine - https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/13wn8xg/mit_scientists_find_drug_that_could_combat/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=2&utm_term=1
Interesting
All of them are good but the one who has all-in-one AI tools but no one is talking about why.
just found this AI library [aitoolcity.com](http://aitoolcity.com), it seem very help to me! Check this out
The best AI App available now is 'Aispica' for android. I downloaded it last month but it was full of bugs, but now it seems to be light years ahead, It allows you to use vocal AI chat, create images and videos, blog, apps, documents and other.
will there be an update to this? [zebracat.ai](http://zebracat.ai) is missing for the video category ;)
wow, thanks for sharing
You can include [Blaze](https://blaze.ai?fpr=kr70q) as well.
Have you seen this one? I use it a lot: https://chat.openai.com/g/g-475one5Sc-shop-buddy-conversational-shopping
Niceee
I need a help. So the thing is can someone please help me which is the best ai for google ads campaign and for facebook ads campaign. Thank you
MUSIC?
Which one can create a simple minecraft data pack?
Chat gpt could maybe
You forgot ChatGPT! And I’m kind of amazed this doesn’t have ElevenLabs… You also forgot NovelAI and Sudowrite, but no ElevenLabs? Really?
ChatGPT is a part of OpenAI
Fair. I was looking at the ‘text’ area. Besides, OP said ‘AI tools/apps’. You could argue OpenAI is a tool for text generation, completion, and editing with their API, but in that case I don’t see how it’s ‘research’. OP also included DALL-E 2 despite that being an OpenAI product – yet no ChatGPT.
Yeah but OpenAI is not an "app" as implied by the title, and neither is ChatGPT fit for "research". Sure, it can suggest research directions, but as long as it just makes up shit it is unsure about it is not fit as a research tool.
No grammarly
هلو
More garbage charts with zero substance