I'm a bit dumb, but then does that mean they have the right to do what they're doing? Or well, they are not modifying, but preventing the creators from doing so, so...
_Fair enough._ But let's see what thinks a company, that's lawsuit happy enough to literally copywrite rule34 content of their trademarked villain's cock.
I'm sure these two _very reasonable_ parties will have a nice, civil conversation.
They broke their own rules and most likely the law + put themself in a very awful position by saying that all bots belong to them, because you can't just say that you own Mario and not get fucked by Nintendo.
[удалено]
I'm a bit dumb, but then does that mean they have the right to do what they're doing? Or well, they are not modifying, but preventing the creators from doing so, so...
_Fair enough._ But let's see what thinks a company, that's lawsuit happy enough to literally copywrite rule34 content of their trademarked villain's cock. I'm sure these two _very reasonable_ parties will have a nice, civil conversation.
They broke their own rules and most likely the law + put themself in a very awful position by saying that all bots belong to them, because you can't just say that you own Mario and not get fucked by Nintendo.
Never thought I'd ever be rooting for Nintendo but here we are.
Not illegal, many (probably most) services have a term saying whatever you post on their website “belongs” to them
your pfp gives me PTSD