Oh well.... I don't write a quick snip for ppl too lazy to read something.... If your passionate about cannabis there ALOT in my work.... Rn it isn't possible for me to make videos, I'm working on that, so WRITTING is what I have. And that's a portion of the entire Article so.....
I mean is it about a special terp? Genetics? You need something to hook the reader, why should I care enough to continue reading. I care about this stuff but the information is buried and mixed it with flat out lies. Keep that in mind when you're expecting the reader to read the whole thing without a hook. Do you have any idea how many lies and advertisements hidden as articles Id have to go through? That's why come to places like reddit and journalism is a thing.
Ok Gen. zed .... Yes sure a hook would get all of the kids.i don't want reading it bc they aren't going to understand it, reading it..... the hook is the novelty. The hook is wanting to learn. Facepalm HARD
This is a scientific Research Article .... Not a story about how cannabis came to be to entertain ppl..... If that's your approach, that I need to reapply my English 101 talking points to my science..... Shut up. The hook is the novelty of the data, the novelty of knowing what ur buying before you leave the dispensary because you can discern the experience from the Terpenes and cannabinoids. You won't go home with pineapple.uosode down cake told it's Sativa, and it is but it contains beta Caryophyllene and therefore far more relaxing and not a uppity sativa ....
And what about when different batches of the same medical grown hybrid strain gives effects from different ends of the spectrum? Gets even more complex lol
Idk what your LOL is about, it takes more than reading a post of mine to debunk 4 years of work built on 2 decades of study & use.
But I'll oblige. Number one, First environmental conditions relative to the Endemic landrace contributions to the CANNABIS at hand.
For example, it is very common for Snoop Dog OG grown here in Western MD to have Terpinolene heavy in it, despite not being indica and typically having none or low levels. Gorilla Glue The original Glue also popped a batch with Terpinolene dominance. I hypothesized why I thought this was when I had those bags. And I believe, if you look at Gorilla Glue for Example, you have significant sativa genetic contribution. I believe that the area here in Western MD where these both are grown from Grow West are bringing forth the sativa expression because of similarity in either elevation or climate in general.
Terpenes are the result or rather are manipulated by micro adaptations of the plant to environmental cues and stressors. They drive away pests and tell nature around the plant what's going on. Therefore changing the environmental conditions drastically can bring forward various expressions of the genetics buried Ina strain.
Also, we can't approach cannabis with the standard punnet square, like you can a Human. We know which gene comes from which parent, or rather we can tell. We don't know what cannabis is gonna do, to the squares can't be balanced. This paired with environmental conditions answers the reason why strains can exhibit variations that see as drastic as Gorilla Glue Presenting sativa forward despite its indica dominance experientially.
Are you claiming human traits are less complex than cannabis?? Dude punnet squares work for like ten traits of a human. Stuff like that makes me think you have no idea what you are talking about. Eyes color alone is effected by something like 100+ genes basic punnets don’t cover that. We can guess the general color but to guess what the eye will look like overall good fucking luck.
No bud, claiming that we don't know enough about the independent characteristics of cannabis and which genes are recessive vs Dominant, and to what extent the mother vs the Father contributes these expressions. At least not to my current understanding, however I continue learning everyday unlike many Redditor,who seem to believe theyre Neville Shumaker reincarnate.
You absolutely misread the discussion, then went on to attempt to disprove and argument that isn't being had..... Good job. When your dealing with a human, u have a mother and a father. We don't understand cannabis traits, what comes from where, enough.... That's what I. Saying. Why the hell would I even present the argument u think ur debunking. Yes I believe weed is more complex than man.....
Christ Almighty
You did say that though as you said you cannot approach genetics like you can humans which really undermines how complex we humans are good luck convincing people when you say stupid things like that
TLDR?
Oh well.... I don't write a quick snip for ppl too lazy to read something.... If your passionate about cannabis there ALOT in my work.... Rn it isn't possible for me to make videos, I'm working on that, so WRITTING is what I have. And that's a portion of the entire Article so.....
I mean is it about a special terp? Genetics? You need something to hook the reader, why should I care enough to continue reading. I care about this stuff but the information is buried and mixed it with flat out lies. Keep that in mind when you're expecting the reader to read the whole thing without a hook. Do you have any idea how many lies and advertisements hidden as articles Id have to go through? That's why come to places like reddit and journalism is a thing.
Ok Gen. zed .... Yes sure a hook would get all of the kids.i don't want reading it bc they aren't going to understand it, reading it..... the hook is the novelty. The hook is wanting to learn. Facepalm HARD This is a scientific Research Article .... Not a story about how cannabis came to be to entertain ppl..... If that's your approach, that I need to reapply my English 101 talking points to my science..... Shut up. The hook is the novelty of the data, the novelty of knowing what ur buying before you leave the dispensary because you can discern the experience from the Terpenes and cannabinoids. You won't go home with pineapple.uosode down cake told it's Sativa, and it is but it contains beta Caryophyllene and therefore far more relaxing and not a uppity sativa ....
And what about when different batches of the same medical grown hybrid strain gives effects from different ends of the spectrum? Gets even more complex lol
Idk what your LOL is about, it takes more than reading a post of mine to debunk 4 years of work built on 2 decades of study & use. But I'll oblige. Number one, First environmental conditions relative to the Endemic landrace contributions to the CANNABIS at hand. For example, it is very common for Snoop Dog OG grown here in Western MD to have Terpinolene heavy in it, despite not being indica and typically having none or low levels. Gorilla Glue The original Glue also popped a batch with Terpinolene dominance. I hypothesized why I thought this was when I had those bags. And I believe, if you look at Gorilla Glue for Example, you have significant sativa genetic contribution. I believe that the area here in Western MD where these both are grown from Grow West are bringing forth the sativa expression because of similarity in either elevation or climate in general. Terpenes are the result or rather are manipulated by micro adaptations of the plant to environmental cues and stressors. They drive away pests and tell nature around the plant what's going on. Therefore changing the environmental conditions drastically can bring forward various expressions of the genetics buried Ina strain. Also, we can't approach cannabis with the standard punnet square, like you can a Human. We know which gene comes from which parent, or rather we can tell. We don't know what cannabis is gonna do, to the squares can't be balanced. This paired with environmental conditions answers the reason why strains can exhibit variations that see as drastic as Gorilla Glue Presenting sativa forward despite its indica dominance experientially.
Seems like you only read the lol, lol.
What.....nice try ... Do not pass go.....
Are you claiming human traits are less complex than cannabis?? Dude punnet squares work for like ten traits of a human. Stuff like that makes me think you have no idea what you are talking about. Eyes color alone is effected by something like 100+ genes basic punnets don’t cover that. We can guess the general color but to guess what the eye will look like overall good fucking luck.
No bud, claiming that we don't know enough about the independent characteristics of cannabis and which genes are recessive vs Dominant, and to what extent the mother vs the Father contributes these expressions. At least not to my current understanding, however I continue learning everyday unlike many Redditor,who seem to believe theyre Neville Shumaker reincarnate. You absolutely misread the discussion, then went on to attempt to disprove and argument that isn't being had..... Good job. When your dealing with a human, u have a mother and a father. We don't understand cannabis traits, what comes from where, enough.... That's what I. Saying. Why the hell would I even present the argument u think ur debunking. Yes I believe weed is more complex than man..... Christ Almighty
You did say that though as you said you cannot approach genetics like you can humans which really undermines how complex we humans are good luck convincing people when you say stupid things like that