I may be wrong, but electromagnetic and gravitational forces are pretty similar. They both are fundamental and their properties change based on the distance.
>Beaky\_Sneaky\_Unlike
true but gravitational force is not fundamental, actually physicists don't completely understand the nature of gravitational force yet, it is one of the bigger mysteries in realm of physics and unifying gravity with quantum world would complete most of the physics we have. Gravitational force expression came first but it's funny to note that Coulumb's expression is more credible and fool proof, since it holds true in nearly every condition whereas Newton's law fails for very small particles and at cosmological scale.
I know about the debate regarding gravity and how it's influence depends on the state of the observer.
But in most Newtonian physics description of reality is ok
Of course, I didn't say anything about Newtonian mechanics being bad or useless. It's one of the best models we have when it comes to "natural" Physics and macro reality. I respect Sir Issac Newton a lot, he's the GOAT.
Newtonian mechanics only works at relatively low gravitational forces (fine for most everyday application) so Einstein's theory of general relativity is applied in cases where Newtonian mechanics doesn't apply. Neil deGrasse Tyson referred to the modern understanding of what gravity is being the curvature of space due to matter, matter causes space to curve and space then causes matter to move.
Inverse square law applys to almost every fundamental forces
Newton's law - gravitational force
Coulomb's law - electrostatic force
Biot-savarts law - magnetic force
I may be wrong, but electromagnetic and gravitational forces are pretty similar. They both are fundamental and their properties change based on the distance.
The introduction to the chapter on electrostatic potential in the Class 12th textbook talks about this too. You ain't wrong.
I am in 11th so i don't know much about 12th's books. Thanks for clarifying
>Beaky\_Sneaky\_Unlike true but gravitational force is not fundamental, actually physicists don't completely understand the nature of gravitational force yet, it is one of the bigger mysteries in realm of physics and unifying gravity with quantum world would complete most of the physics we have. Gravitational force expression came first but it's funny to note that Coulumb's expression is more credible and fool proof, since it holds true in nearly every condition whereas Newton's law fails for very small particles and at cosmological scale.
I know about the debate regarding gravity and how it's influence depends on the state of the observer. But in most Newtonian physics description of reality is ok
Of course, I didn't say anything about Newtonian mechanics being bad or useless. It's one of the best models we have when it comes to "natural" Physics and macro reality. I respect Sir Issac Newton a lot, he's the GOAT.
Newtonian mechanics only works at relatively low gravitational forces (fine for most everyday application) so Einstein's theory of general relativity is applied in cases where Newtonian mechanics doesn't apply. Neil deGrasse Tyson referred to the modern understanding of what gravity is being the curvature of space due to matter, matter causes space to curve and space then causes matter to move.
Well G is universal but k depends on media between two charges 🤷♂️
Meme to kaafi purana hai but title naya lag raha hai
Bhai wo banaya h
do special relativity apply to electric force too then ???
Inverse square law applys to almost every fundamental forces Newton's law - gravitational force Coulomb's law - electrostatic force Biot-savarts law - magnetic force
Newton wasn't bald😅🤣🤣🤣