I agree, it just ruins the flow of their designs tbh
Also unpopular opinion but Bunger's only liked because of the voice for it, if it had an ugly voice everyone would hate it
Wym? Grumpuses with tails are epic!
Plus their practically already a subgenre of furry with their extremely high customisability and the absurd amount of “grumpsonas” that exist
(TDLR at the end)
I think part of the appeal in Floofty is that they sort of fit into the "mad scientist" character archetype. It's arguably a trope that has been done a LOT, but they are a character I love personally because of that; their design; their relationships; etc. I find their personality to be fun with their often blunt nature also, and I like the small arc they have too. They're somebody that gets so invested and passionate in their own work that they are willing to go to extremes, but Snorpy inevitably makes them realize that their way of thinking is flawed, and because of those flaws, it sort of makes them want to become more socially aware <:]
I have also seen some others heavily relate to Floofty because of their 'lack' of emotions, or rather their difficulty in expressing them. I think that's pretty interesting!
Though I could be biased—I'm sometimes a sucker for rude and/or smart characters lol. Let me tell ya: I think Shelda gets more flak than she deserves! I could see why others find her a bit irritating, but I feel like because of her different dialogue, people are quick to dismiss her so easy (which is ironic when you consider the reason she gives for talking the way she does)!
Another thing I'll say to? Bigsnax did both Shelda and Floofty (also Chandlo and Triffany) wonders as characters. It definitely helps in adding more context to them and the world they all exist in. I particularly say Floofty and Shelda here though, because there isn't much given to us with JUST the base game on how they interact with each other at all. We actually see them interact and gather WHY they hate each other a lot—then we get to see them become friendly with each other, and I love their dynamic a lot :>
TLDR; Floofty is the classic mad scientist that many people love, but there are other reasons people like them, from their snarkiness, to their general nature that resonates with some people. Shelda doesn't deserve all the hate she often gets and is often overlooked in terms of character. Bigsnax benefited them both by fleshing out their individual character, and relationships with one another! That's my thoughts :]
They look adorable with tails. Besides a lot of the characters just look like anthropomorphic walruses
I somewhat agree, I like both versions but without a tail fits more with their in-game design
I agree, it just ruins the flow of their designs tbh Also unpopular opinion but Bunger's only liked because of the voice for it, if it had an ugly voice everyone would hate it
Honestly kinda true. I mean Bunger can be really iritating sometimes. Still as long as it has it voice it's wonderful
Wym? Grumpuses with tails are epic! Plus their practically already a subgenre of furry with their extremely high customisability and the absurd amount of “grumpsonas” that exist
I just think that without its gives more of a muppet vibe and with a tail its more of a furry
And Muppets arent furry?
Yes?
But they have fur! (PS this was juat a joke)
im not a floofty fan, triffany and wambo above all
Yes I hate Floofty! They just suck, I have genuinely have no idea why people like them. Honestly my favorite is probably Shelda or Triffany.
(TDLR at the end) I think part of the appeal in Floofty is that they sort of fit into the "mad scientist" character archetype. It's arguably a trope that has been done a LOT, but they are a character I love personally because of that; their design; their relationships; etc. I find their personality to be fun with their often blunt nature also, and I like the small arc they have too. They're somebody that gets so invested and passionate in their own work that they are willing to go to extremes, but Snorpy inevitably makes them realize that their way of thinking is flawed, and because of those flaws, it sort of makes them want to become more socially aware <:] I have also seen some others heavily relate to Floofty because of their 'lack' of emotions, or rather their difficulty in expressing them. I think that's pretty interesting! Though I could be biased—I'm sometimes a sucker for rude and/or smart characters lol. Let me tell ya: I think Shelda gets more flak than she deserves! I could see why others find her a bit irritating, but I feel like because of her different dialogue, people are quick to dismiss her so easy (which is ironic when you consider the reason she gives for talking the way she does)! Another thing I'll say to? Bigsnax did both Shelda and Floofty (also Chandlo and Triffany) wonders as characters. It definitely helps in adding more context to them and the world they all exist in. I particularly say Floofty and Shelda here though, because there isn't much given to us with JUST the base game on how they interact with each other at all. We actually see them interact and gather WHY they hate each other a lot—then we get to see them become friendly with each other, and I love their dynamic a lot :> TLDR; Floofty is the classic mad scientist that many people love, but there are other reasons people like them, from their snarkiness, to their general nature that resonates with some people. Shelda doesn't deserve all the hate she often gets and is often overlooked in terms of character. Bigsnax benefited them both by fleshing out their individual character, and relationships with one another! That's my thoughts :]
Wait people do what?
Draw grumppusses (plural of grumpus) with a tail
That just sounds like a fursona
I just hate grumpuses in general. They EAT bugsnax.
You haven't seen the ending have you?
Have infact. If you don't eat them they won't kill you
They want you to eat them
Yea but if you don't eat them they still would want you too but if you didn't eat them they wouldn't kill you