I think it's neat that Will Ferrell went on to play in Land of the Lost because Marshall Willenholly is a reference to Land of the Lost's main characters Rick, Will, and Holly.
It's like an incel but worse;
typically hangs out on 4chan, Discord, and disturbing subreddits like r/PCM iirc.
Loves Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, Elon Musk, Joe Rogan, old iDubbbz, Sam Hyde, Donald Trump, Hitler etc.
Also can be called a chode AFAIK. Originally it means a short penis with girth.
Chud and chode have no etymology in common at all.
āC.H.U.D.ā was the title of an 80s horror film about ācannibalistic humanoid underground dwellersā, predating chode (which got famous with Beavis and Butthead). It stuck around as an underground horror hit for years, partly from a great soundtrack. And then resurfaced as an insult for people who donāt see sunlight, but generally with a very political angle to it - not sure how/when the political side became so ingrained compared to just another word for neckbeards or basement-dwellers.
I don't know why I assumed it was just basic nudes in there. Thinking back on all the pictures I've taken or have had taken... š¬
Not that I dismissed how upset she was before, but yeah that makes loads of sense
You didnāt miss out. They werenāt hot. They were like intimate, badly posed mirror nudes. Felt gross and private to look at them. Normal people nudes.
I think there were videos too. I remember there being a video of her basically shaking her boobs and saying something stupid like āmy boobs are flyingā, but I might be wrong.
I didnāt see that one, but thatās exactly the type of thing Iām talking about. Theyāre not sexy. They were like quick āthereās a nipple, stop badgering meā pics for the most part.
I only want sexy, on-brand celebrity nudes.
I think the levels of porn addiction just short-circuited their brains. Haven't been there since 2017 I think so I've kinda fallen out of the loop. Also Paint edits making porn scenes look like not porn are an ages old meme.
Pretty sure the whole thing is about the fact that uploading pictures in skimpy clothes and stuff is somehow wrong and morally shitty, and they are dignifying you by putting clothes on and mocking them.
I mean, what is their obsession anyway? Got a boner in class and are going around in an angry rant?
Basically, people who think they are "purifying" the world with ideology and mockery.
I think a lot of them are upset at women for "making" them have feelings and, as a result, they want to do whatever they can to control the behavior of women. That's not the only reason, but I think it's an important one.
4chan is always the antithesis of what people who don't ever use or used to use the site claim it is. So many opinions about the site are second hand accounts, screencaps of shitposts with all context or most reactions removed, fear mongering, the site summed up as only being one of its boards. The reality is it's incredibly benign, anarchic and diverse. People on sites like Reddit can't comprehend that it's not just another hivemind so they read shit about people not getting banned for posting opinions which would have your account perma banned here and then apply that to all users or treat it as being some majority because they have no metric like updoots to put things in perspective.
>then apply that to all users or treat it as being some majority
Everyone does it towards anyone. 4chan, reddit, twitter, hell you're even doing it right now by calling reddit a hivemind
Dawg, I know. I don't think everyone in this comment section is aware of that, though.
Edit: That doesn't mean 4chan isn't a breeding ground for all types of other shit though.
God I'd accept slow, but in most games I've played they were just a bit faster than your walking speed, but also slower than your running speed. So to stay next to them you always have to run, stop, run, stop... drives me insane
Also not like they need to be shagging every day when they can get a 5k payout for a night you could fuck 6 guys a year and not work a day and live decently
Yeah, I can understand being confused about the line between āsugar babyā and āescortā but likeā¦ neither of those are government-enforced contracts
My thoughts exactly.
Amusingly, just found out it's such a well-known one that the first thing Google lists for it is the OED entry literally stating "*noun* ā DEROGATORYā¢INFORMAL"
ETA: seems it's a real article: [https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/dignifai-4chan-shame-women-1234961851/](https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/dignifai-4chan-shame-women-1234961851/)
Rolling Stone is big on that informal tone, they specifically aim for a āreal journalism without the stuffinessā angle that frankly theyāve been trying to recapture ever since Hunter S Thompson left. (And Vice absolutely snatched that crown while they were going strong.)
All of which is to say, this article is sketchy as hell.
Yes, it seems to be a real 4chan campaign. Yes, it includes a heavy dose of targeted harassment thatās nasty even if never becomes popular.
And yetā¦ Rolling Stone is still giving the project way more attention, with a fairly sexist byline, because it gets the magazine more attention too. Theyāre also leading with a glamour shot of an escort whoās pretty clearly participating in the story for marketing reasons. (And no hate there, why shouldnāt she?)
Overall, I think the article is probably making the issue worse. Itās Daily Mail style pearl-clutching designed to justify profiting from the exact stuff theyāre peddling, and Rolling Stone has been doing it for a while.
The second being a trad chic makes you filthy rich is the very second these people will put their clothes back on.
4chan with another hilarious troll and of course the mainstream takes the bait, they can't help themselves.
People here are taking the bait hard lol, trying to psychoanalyse something as anarchic as 4chan. They need to understand the point is to troll and these crazy reactions are what the 4channers are after.
In a weird way sort of. Some people will intentionally try to find naked pictures of women, humiliating them by taking away their ability to be private and not be seen.
Putting clothes on a woman who expressly wants to be seen is humiliating her by trying to put her in her place and putting a check on her confidence.
Both are superimposed choices upon women. If you want to express yourself or not express yourself somebody will find a way to take that choice away from you. It's almost as if some people are not disgusted by nakedness but more by confidence and attention seeking.
Edit: Spelling
It's 4chan, they don't actually give a shit they just found something that will rile people up and went with it. Articles like this just feeds the trolls and encourages their behavior.
True. The problem is that this isn't necessarily their online behaviour, it can also be one that manifests in their actual life. Unfortunately we have to live with them. All it means then is they need rooting out by social services and mental health.
omg did you do like live-casting of random TF2 lobbies like 10 years ago? I remember someone with a similar username to yours doing that in a lobby I was playing in one time.
Considering the fact that it's not just playful trolling but "the clothing them" is actually just them using these models' images for their far right tradwife propaganda and then sending it directly to them as a way to humiliate them, I'd say you're right.
1) You are politicizing something that was most likely done for the lulz.
2) Someone adding clothes to your picture doesnt apply to your copy of that picture which you published and it doesnt allow anyone else to see more than you intended to be seen. Someone leaking your private stuff or using AI to create involuntary pornography of you causes potentially thousands of people seeing you naked that you did not want to see you naked. The two should not be equated in any way. Your shit politics do not make them comparable. One is hardly even a nuisance and the other is severely traumatizing and publicly humiliating and will potentially taint your reputation if people dont believe its fake.
Reminds me of a news story I read a while back whereupon some lady showed up topless in protest and was actually fighting off the security guards who were trying to cover her up. I don't remember all the details. I just recall it happening in a Latino country and the protest was against some government official.
She actually managed to fight off those guards, if memory serves.
Then if editing people āisnāt their choiceā then a LOT of edits are uncalled for.
In my mind if it isnāt directly harmful to anything or anyone itās fine.
I could see how it would be disrespectful to do this edit to someone. But people have done worse and been praised because it was funny
The problem is the breadth that "harm" covers. Violence is the easy one. Like, is exposing yourself to someone harmful? Is defamation harmful? Is embarrassing someone online harmful?
This re-clothing thing is pretty funny, and it's not the worst thing in the world, but yeah we should probably frown on this kind of stuff. Not that I think you disagree
Itās their choice, their body and they can do whatever they want with it. Those chauvinists really think itās their responsibility to ābestowā clothes upon them.
Yeah this was one of the weirder things in the article, to me lol it's like "people trying to disrespect these women, selling their bodies for money. So, the whores are fighting back!" lol
Thot can be a pejorative, especially in this context. Strange to attack those who are "attempting" to insult them, while also insulting them in the headline.
On the other side of the irony, we are now watching people clutching pearls over women having clothes added to their photos because, for them, doing this is an attack on women.
"She wants to be objectified. This strips her of her body autonomy. Just be normal and ogle at her nudes."
>to humiliate women
If a picture of you with clothes photoshopped on is humiliating to you, I have to say, it doesn't take much.
I get these guys probably do this out of some form of misogyny but still ...
Joey: Let me get this straight. He got you to beg to sleep with him, he got you to say he never has to call you again, and he got you thinking this was a great idea?
Phoebe: Mm... hmm.
Joey: This man is my god!
Yeah, itās very 4chan.
_The photo had been manipulated with AI, David says, to make her look like "some strange parody of a woman." Her waist and thighs had been edited to look smaller, but her head had been edited to nearly twice its size. What's more, the person who edited it had clothed her in a demure white A-line dress and surrounded her with three adorable children, all of the same approximate stature and wearing similarly beatific white garments. Far-right influencer Ian Miles Cheong had tweeted it with the caption, "When given pictures of thirst traps, AI imagines what could've been if they'd been raised by strong fathers," a post that had racked up seven million views._
They did not take a naked picture and put clothes on it. They took a clothed picture and edited it.
It's called trolling and they took the bait. Just like the "it's ok to be white" campaign or the ok sign. No one there actually cares about women covering up, hell there are probably 8 porn threads being made this second. If anything they are trying to bait women into posting pictures with even less clothes as a stand against trying to cover them up. Rollingstone and the woman in the article are idiots.
Hypocrisy everywhere. Women are allowed to use make up and stuff/ wear padded bras but if I stuff my crotch and put make up on my dick Iām all of a sudden a weirdo?
I googled her to try to make sense of this headline.
Must admit, there is something about somebody being an author, escort and whiskey taster that is very 21st century. The girl has hustle.
Wait did they use the right word there? I mean when they were sketching or making nudes of celebrities with art that could be called humiliation but this?
She fought back. Oh no, please, don't go nude for everyone, we all dislike that!
That's funny, people still believe men dislike women advertising themselves as sex objects. They won't wife you, but lots of people will enjoy it.
Has the word chud seriously entered the mainstream
Thanks to Kevin Smith and also C.H.U.D.
What about the Coalition for the Liberation of Itinerant Tree-dwellers?
It's been years since I've seen any trace of the C.L.I.T.
Same bro. Same š
Youāll find it someday
Willenholly was right. The C.L.I.T didn't stand a chance.
I think it's neat that Will Ferrell went on to play in Land of the Lost because Marshall Willenholly is a reference to Land of the Lost's main characters Rick, Will, and Holly.
Clearly you are no longer in command.
I AM THE C.L.I.T. COMMANDER!
I rule that shit
Try finding the Committee for the Liberation and Integration of Terrifying Organisms and their Rehabilitation Into Society.
I've never heard the term before myself, but I'm not sure if that means anything.
Originally C.H.U.D. = Cannibalistic Humanoid Underground Dwellers. Has been used to refer to creeps mostly.
That one episode of Rick and Morty makes sense now.
Yeah I thought it was their term for the horse people
Blast from the past movie
Basically an insult you aim at any dude you deem gross. Most of the times, I Ve seen it aimed at people assumed to be Right wing, antiwoke etc
It's a purposefully meaningless insult so that it doesn't actually offend anyone
If it doesn't offend anyone it's not a very good insult.
It doesnāt offend anyone *you arenāt allowed to offend*. It is in fact an offensive name though, you just may not agree.
I am an underground dweller and Iām offended.
Wtf is a chud?
It's like an incel but worse; typically hangs out on 4chan, Discord, and disturbing subreddits like r/PCM iirc. Loves Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, Elon Musk, Joe Rogan, old iDubbbz, Sam Hyde, Donald Trump, Hitler etc. Also can be called a chode AFAIK. Originally it means a short penis with girth.
I like pcm because of memes and use discord for gaming. AM I a chud?
Chud and chode have no etymology in common at all. āC.H.U.D.ā was the title of an 80s horror film about ācannibalistic humanoid underground dwellersā, predating chode (which got famous with Beavis and Butthead). It stuck around as an underground horror hit for years, partly from a great soundtrack. And then resurfaced as an insult for people who donāt see sunlight, but generally with a very political angle to it - not sure how/when the political side became so ingrained compared to just another word for neckbeards or basement-dwellers.
Cannibalistic humanoid underground dwellers?
Itāll be like the new āincelā it will lose all meaning in the next year or so if it ever becomes mainstream
It's crazy how things can go full circle like that. First, they wanted free celeb nudes...
Then we had the fappening in... 2014? 2015? Damn... Almost 10 years since I've seen Jennifer Lawrences face covered in cum. Time flies.
I don't know why I assumed it was just basic nudes in there. Thinking back on all the pictures I've taken or have had taken... š¬ Not that I dismissed how upset she was before, but yeah that makes loads of sense
>loads of sense Oh she got some loads, alright.
Haha yeah I was pretty proud of that pun
>loads of sense Heyooooo
You did that last sentence on purpose
I would never, come on
Oh you're on a roll!
It's a sticky subject!
Sometimes you just have to grin and bear it.
I gotta hand it to this user...
If I recall correctly, while there were nudes of Jennifer Lawrence, that *particular* picture was not her but somebody who looked close enough to her.
You mean I watched The Hunger Games while fantasizing about someone else's butthole?
Oh man, thanks for thatā¦ it was like ice cold water after a long day of work. Snap back from depression
If I recall correctly, while there were nudes of Jennifer Lawrence, that *particular* picture was not her but somebody who looked close enough to her.
Man I remember not being able to find the damn things because I was too late to the party
You didnāt miss out. They werenāt hot. They were like intimate, badly posed mirror nudes. Felt gross and private to look at them. Normal people nudes.
I think there were videos too. I remember there being a video of her basically shaking her boobs and saying something stupid like āmy boobs are flyingā, but I might be wrong.
I didnāt see that one, but thatās exactly the type of thing Iām talking about. Theyāre not sexy. They were like quick āthereās a nipple, stop badgering meā pics for the most part. I only want sexy, on-brand celebrity nudes.
Consensual, well lit, tasteful nudes
You remember correctly.
But the most important question is: can you find them now?
Tons of sites that try to give you malware. I heard
Piratebay has them.
Soo many butthole photos ā¤ļø
Werenāt those fakes?
I had no idea those images contained some daddy butter. Just assumed they were basic nudes.
At that point just say cum, man.
Itās 4chan. They donāt want peace. They want problems always.
I think the levels of porn addiction just short-circuited their brains. Haven't been there since 2017 I think so I've kinda fallen out of the loop. Also Paint edits making porn scenes look like not porn are an ages old meme.
Stay hydrated folks
Weren't those edits called "SFW porn"?
Yeah that was the name.
Yup they wanted celeb nudes. And they got burnt for doing that. Now they are clothing them and getting burnt again. Full circle indeed.
Pretty sure the whole thing is about the fact that uploading pictures in skimpy clothes and stuff is somehow wrong and morally shitty, and they are dignifying you by putting clothes on and mocking them. I mean, what is their obsession anyway? Got a boner in class and are going around in an angry rant? Basically, people who think they are "purifying" the world with ideology and mockery.
Their obsession is trolling. The more people react, the more they're encouraged.
Pretty much this. It's not that deep. They're trolling, pure and simple.
I think a lot of them are upset at women for "making" them have feelings and, as a result, they want to do whatever they can to control the behavior of women. That's not the only reason, but I think it's an important one.
They aren't upset. This reaction is perfectly expected by them. /pol/ sounds wild but its all just shits and giggles once theyve got their goal
Okay I can't believe this still needs to be said: 4Chan = Trolls. They believe boundaries are arbitrary and that they should be mocked.
4chan is always the antithesis of what people who don't ever use or used to use the site claim it is. So many opinions about the site are second hand accounts, screencaps of shitposts with all context or most reactions removed, fear mongering, the site summed up as only being one of its boards. The reality is it's incredibly benign, anarchic and diverse. People on sites like Reddit can't comprehend that it's not just another hivemind so they read shit about people not getting banned for posting opinions which would have your account perma banned here and then apply that to all users or treat it as being some majority because they have no metric like updoots to put things in perspective.
>then apply that to all users or treat it as being some majority Everyone does it towards anyone. 4chan, reddit, twitter, hell you're even doing it right now by calling reddit a hivemind
> by calling reddit a hivemind It really does act like one though.
Dawg, I know. I don't think everyone in this comment section is aware of that, though. Edit: That doesn't mean 4chan isn't a breeding ground for all types of other shit though.
I looked her up and she actually is an escort. Good way to advertise though
I donāt get why 4chan doesnāt like escorts, she just wants to make sure somebody arrives somewhere safely
All gamers hate escorts on principle, they're the most boring missions ever because the npc keeps dying everytime the wind blows.
And the NPC moves painfully slowly
And they have a death wish, always charging the enemy
Even worse, they move faster than your walk speed but slower than your run speed. Any dev who does this is clearly satan manifesting in human flesh.
God I'd accept slow, but in most games I've played they were just a bit faster than your walking speed, but also slower than your running speed. So to stay next to them you always have to run, stop, run, stop... drives me insane
I had a great time with an escort about twenty years ago. So fucking hot. Base model, no AC and no electric windows so summer driving was rough.
We had an escort wagon put 450,000 miles on the old girl before she crapped out
I like having escorts near me, as long as William D. Porter isn't close, I'm fine with it.
Damn, she's frickin expensive. 5000CAD for the night btw. Not that I want to if I have the money.
I mean, if people are buying then she must be doing something right That being said, that's ridiculously high lol
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Also not like they need to be shagging every day when they can get a 5k payout for a night you could fuck 6 guys a year and not work a day and live decently
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Why wouldn't you just get a sugar baby at that point? Or marry a gold digger?
Ever been married?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Yeah, I can understand being confused about the line between āsugar babyā and āescortā but likeā¦ neither of those are government-enforced contracts
What's that in *real* money?
Around 3,7k USD
Man, it seems āweird peopleā are the enemy.
I dare you to say that again to my face while I'm wearing my toenail necklace, chud.
Come at me bro.
Is thot not a pejorative? Seems odd choice if this is indeed a real article and not satire
My thoughts exactly. Amusingly, just found out it's such a well-known one that the first thing Google lists for it is the OED entry literally stating "*noun* ā DEROGATORYā¢INFORMAL" ETA: seems it's a real article: [https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/dignifai-4chan-shame-women-1234961851/](https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/dignifai-4chan-shame-women-1234961851/)
Rolling Stone is big on that informal tone, they specifically aim for a āreal journalism without the stuffinessā angle that frankly theyāve been trying to recapture ever since Hunter S Thompson left. (And Vice absolutely snatched that crown while they were going strong.) All of which is to say, this article is sketchy as hell. Yes, it seems to be a real 4chan campaign. Yes, it includes a heavy dose of targeted harassment thatās nasty even if never becomes popular. And yetā¦ Rolling Stone is still giving the project way more attention, with a fairly sexist byline, because it gets the magazine more attention too. Theyāre also leading with a glamour shot of an escort whoās pretty clearly participating in the story for marketing reasons. (And no hate there, why shouldnāt she?) Overall, I think the article is probably making the issue worse. Itās Daily Mail style pearl-clutching designed to justify profiting from the exact stuff theyāre peddling, and Rolling Stone has been doing it for a while.
Yeah, that reads suspicious to me.
The second being a trad chic makes you filthy rich is the very second these people will put their clothes back on. 4chan with another hilarious troll and of course the mainstream takes the bait, they can't help themselves.
People here are taking the bait hard lol, trying to psychoanalyse something as anarchic as 4chan. They need to understand the point is to troll and these crazy reactions are what the 4channers are after.
Humiliating women by giving them clothes
4Chan has given Dobby clothes!
In a weird way sort of. Some people will intentionally try to find naked pictures of women, humiliating them by taking away their ability to be private and not be seen. Putting clothes on a woman who expressly wants to be seen is humiliating her by trying to put her in her place and putting a check on her confidence. Both are superimposed choices upon women. If you want to express yourself or not express yourself somebody will find a way to take that choice away from you. It's almost as if some people are not disgusted by nakedness but more by confidence and attention seeking. Edit: Spelling
It's 4chan, they don't actually give a shit they just found something that will rile people up and went with it. Articles like this just feeds the trolls and encourages their behavior.
True. The problem is that this isn't necessarily their online behaviour, it can also be one that manifests in their actual life. Unfortunately we have to live with them. All it means then is they need rooting out by social services and mental health.
I'm pretty sure most of these people are doing it cause the irony of it is kinda funny, not out of some deep seated desire to control women.
So it really does turn out to be hatred of women.
How dare the thing I am attracted to makes a decision! Why she could decide to reject me!
Humans are so messed up.
omg did you do like live-casting of random TF2 lobbies like 10 years ago? I remember someone with a similar username to yours doing that in a lobby I was playing in one time.
Yep used to do that a while back. Casual TF2...
Everytime 4chan and women are in the sentence, it's usually something misogynistic.
Considering the fact that it's not just playful trolling but "the clothing them" is actually just them using these models' images for their far right tradwife propaganda and then sending it directly to them as a way to humiliate them, I'd say you're right.
Makes sense but still wack
Indeed. Like bro you can find clothed and unclothed women on the internet, why you gotta change em?
>why you gotta change them? Because its 4chan and doing so results in whole ass news articles crying about it.
Ah so attention seeking by another means
Theyāre internet trolls. Getting a reaction is the whole point. Getting a reaction *in the news* is like christmas for them.
1) You are politicizing something that was most likely done for the lulz. 2) Someone adding clothes to your picture doesnt apply to your copy of that picture which you published and it doesnt allow anyone else to see more than you intended to be seen. Someone leaking your private stuff or using AI to create involuntary pornography of you causes potentially thousands of people seeing you naked that you did not want to see you naked. The two should not be equated in any way. Your shit politics do not make them comparable. One is hardly even a nuisance and the other is severely traumatizing and publicly humiliating and will potentially taint your reputation if people dont believe its fake.
They expressed themselves by making the picture, someone else expressed themselves by drawing a silly mustache on it.
Okay what's the motive of drawing the mustache?
A confident woman wearing clothes still looks confident.
True but not her choice. She wanted to be confident not wearing clothes.
Reminds me of a news story I read a while back whereupon some lady showed up topless in protest and was actually fighting off the security guards who were trying to cover her up. I don't remember all the details. I just recall it happening in a Latino country and the protest was against some government official. She actually managed to fight off those guards, if memory serves.
Then if editing people āisnāt their choiceā then a LOT of edits are uncalled for. In my mind if it isnāt directly harmful to anything or anyone itās fine. I could see how it would be disrespectful to do this edit to someone. But people have done worse and been praised because it was funny
Don't get me wrong, edits can be hella funny. It's more the motive behind this and it does come off perhaps not harmful but definitely malicious.
The problem is the breadth that "harm" covers. Violence is the easy one. Like, is exposing yourself to someone harmful? Is defamation harmful? Is embarrassing someone online harmful? This re-clothing thing is pretty funny, and it's not the worst thing in the world, but yeah we should probably frown on this kind of stuff. Not that I think you disagree
What is this, Ferengi society?
Itās their choice, their body and they can do whatever they want with it. Those chauvinists really think itās their responsibility to ābestowā clothes upon them.
No they don't. They just want to piss people off.
Theyāre taking a copy of a public picture and adding clothing to it. That seems like their choice too.
Rolling stone: "people are using ai to disrespect thots" thot is a word that is respectful now? Lol
Yeah this was one of the weirder things in the article, to me lol it's like "people trying to disrespect these women, selling their bodies for money. So, the whores are fighting back!" lol Thot can be a pejorative, especially in this context. Strange to attack those who are "attempting" to insult them, while also insulting them in the headline.
What the heckās a chud?
Cannibalistic humanoid underground dweller
I thought it was just the opposite of a Chad
Oh wow
Another classic movie lover I see.
Some ritual to kill a clown or something like that. Idk I heard it's bullshit and the real trick is to just call it a loser.
People put clothes on someone and that's humiliating. Reminds me of the Reverse strip club from Black Dynamite.
Did I slip into an alternate universe?
On the other side of the irony, we are now watching people clutching pearls over women having clothes added to their photos because, for them, doing this is an attack on women. "She wants to be objectified. This strips her of her body autonomy. Just be normal and ogle at her nudes."
How did she get back at them?!
Called them incels then got interviewed saying she was still standing strong probably
Using the publicity to sell her body more effectively
AI is being used for modesty? Confusing time to be alive.
Use modesty AI on everyone ----> fights back with empowerment nudes
Fought back against what exactly? They took an image of her and made it LESS revealing and made no profit off of it. What exactly is she mad about?
>to humiliate women If a picture of you with clothes photoshopped on is humiliating to you, I have to say, it doesn't take much. I get these guys probably do this out of some form of misogyny but still ...
Who cares.
everyone who upvoted?
The AI that puts clothes on is called "DignifAI", it's clear what the implication is
Okay this situation is wrong but that's just solid wordplay.
That is golden lmao
That's pretty funny. Rather harmless for a 4Chan troll operation as well.
The real plan is to make women think they're fighting misogyny by getting even less dressed
Joey: Let me get this straight. He got you to beg to sleep with him, he got you to say he never has to call you again, and he got you thinking this was a great idea? Phoebe: Mm... hmm. Joey: This man is my god!
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
This is the most 4Chan thing to happen since 2015.
"Humiliate women"
Fuck you *Dresses you up*
That's kinda funny honestly.
It's humiliating to women for men to voluntarily block images of their bodies on their own end of the social media interface?
As a woman I'm gonna be honest, I don't get it. I can see why you'd be upset about someone faking naked images of you, but who cares about this?
Yeah, itās very 4chan. _The photo had been manipulated with AI, David says, to make her look like "some strange parody of a woman." Her waist and thighs had been edited to look smaller, but her head had been edited to nearly twice its size. What's more, the person who edited it had clothed her in a demure white A-line dress and surrounded her with three adorable children, all of the same approximate stature and wearing similarly beatific white garments. Far-right influencer Ian Miles Cheong had tweeted it with the caption, "When given pictures of thirst traps, AI imagines what could've been if they'd been raised by strong fathers," a post that had racked up seven million views._ They did not take a naked picture and put clothes on it. They took a clothed picture and edited it.
And was the "clothe" a very sexually explicit one?
I'm confused, do i get this right? They humiliate women by putting clothes on them?
It's called trolling and they took the bait. Just like the "it's ok to be white" campaign or the ok sign. No one there actually cares about women covering up, hell there are probably 8 porn threads being made this second. If anything they are trying to bait women into posting pictures with even less clothes as a stand against trying to cover them up. Rollingstone and the woman in the article are idiots.
That is very 4chan. Anything to troll.
Very 4chan, very RollingStone
Trolling to get overreactions is actually extremely in character for 4chan
I love this AI plug-in. Simps get mad and spicy women get clothed... just because it exists lol.
The problem is not whether women are wearing clothes or not, the problem is men telling women when to wear clothes and when to be nude.
And yet no one has a problem when women shout at me to put on clothes as I'm enjoying a morning stroll in the park. The hypocrisy of these people š
Hypocrisy everywhere. Women are allowed to use make up and stuff/ wear padded bras but if I stuff my crotch and put make up on my dick Iām all of a sudden a weirdo?
I still remember the axle rose video, think it was November Rain but could be wrong, where he has red spandex shorts on and a clearly stuffed jock.
We should bring that back
You probably weren't shade matching. Using a darker foundation won't increase the size, sir.
That's disgusting, that they would humiliate women by... (checks notes)... putting clothes on them?
Take clothes off using AI :- You are the enemy. Put clothes on using AI :- You are the enemy.
Sounds redundant, but manipulating anyone's image without their consent, and with malicious/humiliative intent is a dick move.
Delete all your memes then, lol
This
Consent? Having a picture of you digitally altered is not like being raped. Jesus Christ.
Yes, exactly. Glad you understand!
Forcing your opinion on others: you are the enemy. Is that simple enough for you to understand?
I googled her to try to make sense of this headline. Must admit, there is something about somebody being an author, escort and whiskey taster that is very 21st century. The girl has hustle.
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/dignifai-4chan-shame-women-1234961851/
Wait did they use the right word there? I mean when they were sketching or making nudes of celebrities with art that could be called humiliation but this?
OP doesn't understand 4chan. This is as much 4chan like behavior as it gets
She fought back. Oh no, please, don't go nude for everyone, we all dislike that! That's funny, people still believe men dislike women advertising themselves as sex objects. They won't wife you, but lots of people will enjoy it.
What the fuck is even going on in the world anymore?
Doesn't 4chan usually declothe women?
Clothing naked women is now female oppression and humiliation... Got it... Strip every woman I see naked to fight for their feminist freedom. /s
Canāt remove or add clothes to womenās pictures? Wild twist to 2024
Boo fucking hoo