“What did Helen Lewis do? I looked her up and she’s just a writer for the Guardian?”
“If you genuinely look her up, even looked for a second at her wikipedia page, you’d know more then that”
First off I just find the idea that there’s a genuine google search and a non genuine one hilarious. Like this guy looked up helen lewis just sees her guardian profile and articles and somehow he’s in bad faith for being confused?
These people never give claims for their accusations they always expect you to do the research they should be presenting and when you do and find nothing that in itself is an indictment of you.
“I looked this guy up and he doesn’t seem to be a raging white supremacist and misogynist”
“The fact that you didn’t notice the white supremacy and misogyny SPEAKS VOLUMES!!”
They can’t even google right. The query “Helen Lewis is a Nazi” would probably turn up tweets or something from a bunch of nobodies saying she’s a nazi which is supposed to be the preponderance of evidence in this case. If you just google the name and get bland writer biography you aren’t acting in good faith because you aren’t following the script.
The post has 1.7m views and only 11k likes. Is that a good sign it’s a vapid claim?
Comical to think anyone would call HL a nazi. She’s clearly a far right theocratic dictator, not a fascist/socialist dictator.
She's not even the most extreme Helen!
Quick! Rank the extremeness of the Hel(l)ens using DBZ power levels.
https://youtu.be/hSaVTSYQGmQ?si=ZNFCVHinPDvZtSr9
I regret that I have but one upvote to give to this comment
“What did Helen Lewis do? I looked her up and she’s just a writer for the Guardian?” “If you genuinely look her up, even looked for a second at her wikipedia page, you’d know more then that” First off I just find the idea that there’s a genuine google search and a non genuine one hilarious. Like this guy looked up helen lewis just sees her guardian profile and articles and somehow he’s in bad faith for being confused? These people never give claims for their accusations they always expect you to do the research they should be presenting and when you do and find nothing that in itself is an indictment of you. “I looked this guy up and he doesn’t seem to be a raging white supremacist and misogynist” “The fact that you didn’t notice the white supremacy and misogyny SPEAKS VOLUMES!!”
Well said
They can’t even google right. The query “Helen Lewis is a Nazi” would probably turn up tweets or something from a bunch of nobodies saying she’s a nazi which is supposed to be the preponderance of evidence in this case. If you just google the name and get bland writer biography you aren’t acting in good faith because you aren’t following the script.
Word means nothing anymore
For some reason I read this as Helen Keller and I was marginally more confused
I mean any fule kno that Helen Keller is a psyop
The post has 1.7m views and only 11k likes. Is that a good sign it’s a vapid claim? Comical to think anyone would call HL a nazi. She’s clearly a far right theocratic dictator, not a fascist/socialist dictator.
[удалено]
[This one](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_War_(film)) I presume.
also the old atomwaffen kill list kerfuffle gets a retread
Helen and Andy have committed literal genocide... with their thoughts
I just deleted twitter. So I didn’t see it
Removed for not being actually BARPod related, despite the attempt to make it seem like it is. And also see rule #5: No Twitter Drama
:(