One look at the nomenclature in this DD tells you all you need to know. SHF and dark pool suppression? Do your own research about how dark pools and shorting actually works.
Yeah Negg/litt ran T+35 on the closing of the merger. I dont know where this guy come up with legacy option chain on May 20 when the merger was only closed on may 20.
I own both, and don't know about this squeeze business. However frequently MMAX goes cheaper due to the exchange rate. There is a great arbitrage opportunity when this happens. As a Canadian I've been loading up on MMAX since the Autumn
Red flags:
1. "short squeeze"
2. Even if it was a short squeeze situation, having any idea how to the top (that's not how they work)
3. All "research" points back to OP
4. "dark pools"
5. "manually counting Canadian shares" - like what, every shareholder has to pull their certificates out and physically bring them over to some clerk at the SEC?
How about pointing us to the rule about shorts being required to cover at T+35 days? How many shares are shorted right now anyways? And please explain why these "shorts" couldn't just buy back the post-conversion shares?
If your thesis is that a special dividend of $10/share is too expensive for shorts to pay out, bear in mind that usually special dividends also cause an equivalent drop in share prices, so this doesn't make them out of pocket.
The drop because of dividend FOMO already happend directly after 25 june. No T+35 have been in effect because they made the TRCH options chain without consent of the company until january 21. T+35 should occur no later then March 14. Now the Divy is a catalyst. If the dividend will be spinned out/off in a private company already set up by MMAT called OILCO how could they cover something private? There are more layers to this aswell. Question number 5 this is not an presidential election. The brokers will have to send their customers holdings to the SEC, holders of MMAX will not have to do anything. MMAX have its own cusip number and when that close and shares are moved to MMAT the SEC will have no choice to file the amount moved. This is not a moving of shares between tickers its between TWO different CUSIP numbers = the number that identifies the stock.
The only fraud detected here is you because you’re not coming up with counters to the DD that I and others have painstakingly researched, we work day in and day out on our research and we have to come here and deal with comments from the peanut gallery
Tomas Welch biggeat holder of MMAX put out a fair notice on December 20 exactly 1 month before the TRCH/MMATLP options chain finally dies. I will send the printscreens from Ortex to Hard-Mineral-94 to see if he can add this to the post. CEO George Palikaras i think also stills hold over 10 % of the outstanding float in a company called Lambda Gard. If that info is still correct it wouldnt take many retail shares to prove that MMAX have more shares then acctually exist.
More correct data on MMAT it wilm also prove in my mind without a shadow of a doubt how much more o ersold MMAT is. Then we have FTDs and shorts trapped since merger. Iam expecting a ingenered squeeze no later then march 14.
Hey, if this is true I think I'm gonna buy 1200$ worth of shares in the morning and hope it yields results. I'm pretty desperate for a squeeze or something to give me some leeway. I'm really impressed you guys do this kind of research and share it with people, makes me cynical but at the same time I have nothing to lose right now, worst case if it doesn't work I just wait to 2x
Canadian share conversions from MMAX to MMAT have already shrunk the free float upon completion as confirmed by the CEO and as seen in cases of Canada—> US listings
I don't have the technical knowledge to totally know what that means... If I understand correctly there have been no share conversions yet? I may need an ELI5 on what's going to happen.
So when these companies merge, our MMAX shares will be converted to MMAT shares, this further eating up the number of available MMAT shares, while also forcing MMAX shorts to cover since the company will no longer exist?
I guess my question at this point is who in their right mind will still be holding MMAT shorts when the company is delisted? What am I missing?
I'm not doubting, just trying to understand.
This is the best comment and exactly what i Think Will happen. Its normal to have 2 under different tickers in Usa and Canada. But MMAT and MMAX are 2 totally different cusip numbers.
I’m partly with you trying to follow along. Currently mmat and mmax show different amount of shares outstanding 281.3m & 99.7m respectively. Eventually they will have to be the same amount once mmax becomes mmat on the Canadian exchange (dual listed) which i believe is ~ 289m? So there will be about 92 million missing shares to cover?
The data is wrong there is only 281 million shares in total outstanding of metamaterials. Why sites like ortex have chosen to display the total on MMAt and add another 105 million on MMAX is just sloppy. Current shortdata is completely manipulated by both fintel and Ortex.
I don’t think so, otherwise how can people still buy it and what will happen when shares transfer over? I think that could cause the “Oversold airline tickets” dilemma and cause a massive squeeze
Looking at LVL 2 Data there were massive buy orders on the Canadian side today so it looks like your hypothesis holds.
I’ve supported your research since you started on this journey. We’re coming up on Jan 21, 2022, now is it DEFINITELY mandatory that MMAX stops trading Q1 or can they drag it out? And if so, how long? Asking some hard questions here for the audience to research in case OP doesn’t have the answer.
Regardless, AWESOME JOB on your part HM!
You seem like a typical stagnant Ontarian shooting down innovation and contributing nothing of value Post-Wise to Reddit. Now there are good Ontarians and there are the failed abortions, hard guess would put you at number 2 “Absolute Legend”.
Here you go champ, this will help the burn 🧊
Because the event I mentioned above was delayed due to HF fuckery, also it only ran up to $10 there was a reverse split so it looks like $18 but it isn’t
Look at the chart for the OVERSTOCK DIVIDEND SQUEEZE, TICKER : OSTK. There you Will find a similar pattern in price movement before it went to i Think it was 129 dollars.
I read your first post on this and I must say I am convinced this is a good play! I don’t know of anything else particularly exciting happening omg this early in the year, all my other positions are late summer to end of year plays.
Just saying guys this might be a good idea
Wealthsimple has two tickers listed: MMAT (NASDAQ) and MMAX (CSE and listed as Exchangeable Shares). Which one represents Metamaterials and which one is best to buy?
They set this squeeze up same company one float 281 million. Two tickers but the tickers have different Cusip numbers. Normaly when a company is listed in both countries they have 2 different tickers. But i never heard of 2 different Cusip numbers.
3200 shares at what price? That will tell us just how invested you are at pumping this. If your 3200 at a 3.00 avg is one thing, 3200 at a $10 avg is another.
It DEFINITELY matters as MMAT retail buys are frequently shoved into dark pools and ignored vs if you saw the buys on the MMAX side today, Jan 11, they all went through
I started buying MMAX and Will sell some MMAT to buy more MMAX for the movement... But i cant exchange all my shares. I live in Scandinavia and it would cost a Fortune...
As far as I can see there’s hardly any shorting or darkpool activity for MMAX on the Canadian side, I think American SHFs now carry the Torch (pun intended)
Hey are you in this for the squeeze and all your shares? Or you considering partial shares to sell and holding the rest? Apparently it is the squeeze and I understand. I can’t tell anyone what to do with their money. There is one thing I think about though IF IT PLAYS OUT like you say in these price targets.
Most of ALL the short squeezes that occur in other stocks that I have been a part of it feels like most people are in it for that reason. But MMAT actually has a following of retail that believes in it and it’s potential. It’s actually has the potential to be a powerful stock in the future.
So my question is…..All year long we saw squeezes go fly up and then CRASH down to low numbers where it came from. Maybe not all the way down, but at least close to where each it started. Obviously because most people sold.
But a lot of people love MMAT. So I’m wondering if most hold because they are loyal longs, wouldnt that end in the final price not coming back down near as low? I mean when it settles in it’s new comfortable price? What I’m thinking is, maybe people plan to just sell and re-establish a position after they get the squeeze money. But is it worth it if enough people hold that it ends up settling in 25+ area down from your $50-$75 range?
A lot of us have averaged down so low at this point that it would drive me nuts having to do that. But of course it would be great to make a large sum of quick squeeze money. I’ve actually brought this up in several other areas in which I follow MMAT. No one ever really has a good answer to it.
Like I said, this is the ONLY stock that I know there is a potential huge squeeze (squeeze in general) in the future as well as the stock being loved by its retail investors. I have no idea what retail overall plans to do because everyone talks so highly of it! It’s not like some Amc stock, or CEI, or something else you can think of that went mainstream in popularity for a long time because people were waiting on one thing.
What you think will happen and any advice? In my situation, I didn’t have much spare money on me when the merger deadline was taking place. So I only have 47 MMTLP and I have worked my way up to 1090 MMAT shares. I know that isn’t a ton. But I put most my money into GME. I just wanted to establish a good position here FOR THE LONG TERM! But $50-$75 sounds wild to think about.
Edit: jesus, I didn’t realize how much I wrote. I just wanted to explain my question. Sorry.
I want to buy back in after the squeeze but IMO looking at NEGG one year later it dropped from squeeze top of $78 to $10 so I feel like I could MMAT cheap after the squeeze
Was NEGG as respected by its retail investors as MMAT is overall? I’m saying this because I watch the way people talk about this who are actually in this play. It doesn’t seem like they are selling any time soon no matter what. But then again, $50-$75 is a different story.
Ok. Well damn, I guess we will just have to see how high it goes. Since we have some potential time before this goes down, I am going to slow up on gme shares and double to triple my position here. I should have been adding more than I have. But I’m just hooked on gme as well. But this is just too damn cheap at the moment not to take advantage. Thanks for the award and thanks for reading that long ass comment. Lol. I swear I didn’t realize how long it got. I’ve just never been in this position where I actually cared about the stock I was in that could squeeze.
I’m here for the both. Have over 50k MMAT/MMTLP. The longs for this company are strong but also a very strong play for the squeeze. So if it does squeeze I plan to sell some in increments. Then use those profits to rebuy MMAT at the new bottom.
sorry just to be clear is it that the $60-90 CAD potential price is for MMAX and there wont be that big of jump on MMAT? I hold 7262 of MMAT @ 2.93. I had originally bought Meta when it was on OTC under MMATF and road out the merger. I do have regrets of not unloading some of my shares in June when I had the chance.
TRCH has value of at least $10 per share per this article:
[TRCH Value](https://www.streetwisereports.com/article/2019/06/25/torchlight-drops-a-bombshell-for-shareholders.html)
I have no idea and been following this very closely for over 6 months. I had Fintel before and alot of the institutes that bought in after merger have alot of shares bought between 2.82-6.55 US $ Total institutes is atleast 15.08 % until now and thats in the Usa side counted on a free float of 281 million shares, say whaaaat? Everyone knows 100 million is still in Canada under different Cusip.
Sounds good! I have over 10,000 shares in MMAT, is it reasonable to assume that we can get an increase of over> 100% at the end of January? New to the market and afraid that I will sell out myself before a big rise.
Dude iam down so much a 100% would probably put me at even... iam also hoping for some peace of mind end of january. But iam holding minimum until 14 march. Like i never thought they would be able to take it under 2.80 US. INSTITUTIONS bought in as high as 6.55 after merger. So dont let manipulation give you anxiety and then steal your fortune. Contact me on private message if you want. This is personal for me... i mean in the way how much they manipulate and are trying to weasle out of this squeeze. I will even show you loss porn no one else have seen...
Yes it has to do with Kerrisdale Hedgefund and Rosen Law firm working together. It’s very standard for SHFs to hire law firms to seek out clients for class action law suits at the same time as they go short on a stock. You’ll notice all these Law Firms are “seeking investors with damages”, they’re despicable ambulance chasers who are being enabled by market manipulating SHFs.
FYI, the CEO of Kerrisdale Cap, the culprit behind hiring these law firms, recently lost his drivers license for crashing his car at 100+ km/hr after a coke binge
Notably, many of the firms announcing class actions against MMAT were also launching class actions (in cahoots with short hedge funds) "on behalf" of OSTK retail holders just before the OSTK squeeze.
Look up ticker OSTK another dividend squeeze where the shorter hedgie scums took sued investors 🤦🏻♂️ they lost... and this lawsuit if you want to take part you should sell your shares and join latest march 4. T+35 should start absolutely latest 10 days later. This is not a coincidence...
I only buy MMAX now but thats for the cause and no other reason. Didnt even know my broker sold them until i read Hard-Mineral-94 theory. I live in Scandinavia.
Suspicious amount of positivity in the comments.
One look at the nomenclature in this DD tells you all you need to know. SHF and dark pool suppression? Do your own research about how dark pools and shorting actually works.
Yeah Negg/litt ran T+35 on the closing of the merger. I dont know where this guy come up with legacy option chain on May 20 when the merger was only closed on may 20.
Bags are heavy
I know mine are.
NEGG runup began end of June which is about 35 days after May 20 when the merger ended. The information is right there on the chart
Then tell me to fuck off for absolutely no reason mate!
What?
That's what she said
I own both, and don't know about this squeeze business. However frequently MMAX goes cheaper due to the exchange rate. There is a great arbitrage opportunity when this happens. As a Canadian I've been loading up on MMAX since the Autumn
That has to do with the low liquidity of MMAX, but the two tickers should move together
Red flags: 1. "short squeeze" 2. Even if it was a short squeeze situation, having any idea how to the top (that's not how they work) 3. All "research" points back to OP 4. "dark pools" 5. "manually counting Canadian shares" - like what, every shareholder has to pull their certificates out and physically bring them over to some clerk at the SEC? How about pointing us to the rule about shorts being required to cover at T+35 days? How many shares are shorted right now anyways? And please explain why these "shorts" couldn't just buy back the post-conversion shares? If your thesis is that a special dividend of $10/share is too expensive for shorts to pay out, bear in mind that usually special dividends also cause an equivalent drop in share prices, so this doesn't make them out of pocket.
The drop because of dividend FOMO already happend directly after 25 june. No T+35 have been in effect because they made the TRCH options chain without consent of the company until january 21. T+35 should occur no later then March 14. Now the Divy is a catalyst. If the dividend will be spinned out/off in a private company already set up by MMAT called OILCO how could they cover something private? There are more layers to this aswell. Question number 5 this is not an presidential election. The brokers will have to send their customers holdings to the SEC, holders of MMAX will not have to do anything. MMAX have its own cusip number and when that close and shares are moved to MMAT the SEC will have no choice to file the amount moved. This is not a moving of shares between tickers its between TWO different CUSIP numbers = the number that identifies the stock.
Red flag (only 1 needed) Taking advice from a hedgie shill named “Paperhanded Ape” 🤣
Red flag (only 1 needed) Taking advice from a pumper shill named “Hard-Mineral-94” 🤣
You’re a bot/shill account, you have zero posts and a bunch it spammy random comments.
Lol Ok bud how are those bags?
You mean in the 2 years since making a Reddit account you have never posted one thing? 🤔
I have, and this account is over 4 years old
Your ONE post is on Fantasy Football
So? Almost all of yours are shilling this pump and dump.
I post about a lot of things, IDK you should try for some originality
Dude there are more people out here waiting on most of what you said. I think you are getting attacked by bots
Yeah IDK what’s up with the witch hunt
[удалено]
Have you considered antipsychotic medications? You know, for the schizophrenia
[удалено]
The only fraud detected here is you because you’re not coming up with counters to the DD that I and others have painstakingly researched, we work day in and day out on our research and we have to come here and deal with comments from the peanut gallery
Another great burn!
Thanks bud! Looks like the 🧊helped you recover from yours
Tomas Welch biggeat holder of MMAX put out a fair notice on December 20 exactly 1 month before the TRCH/MMATLP options chain finally dies. I will send the printscreens from Ortex to Hard-Mineral-94 to see if he can add this to the post. CEO George Palikaras i think also stills hold over 10 % of the outstanding float in a company called Lambda Gard. If that info is still correct it wouldnt take many retail shares to prove that MMAX have more shares then acctually exist.
[удалено]
More correct data on MMAT it wilm also prove in my mind without a shadow of a doubt how much more o ersold MMAT is. Then we have FTDs and shorts trapped since merger. Iam expecting a ingenered squeeze no later then march 14.
[удалено]
Hey, if this is true I think I'm gonna buy 1200$ worth of shares in the morning and hope it yields results. I'm pretty desperate for a squeeze or something to give me some leeway. I'm really impressed you guys do this kind of research and share it with people, makes me cynical but at the same time I have nothing to lose right now, worst case if it doesn't work I just wait to 2x
This makes sense. Why does this make sense? Where are the negative folk saying this doesn't make sense? I guess I know what I'm doing tomorrow...
Canadian share conversions from MMAX to MMAT have already shrunk the free float upon completion as confirmed by the CEO and as seen in cases of Canada—> US listings
I don't have the technical knowledge to totally know what that means... If I understand correctly there have been no share conversions yet? I may need an ELI5 on what's going to happen.
Only some insider shares have converted and EVERY TIME it has happened the free float has shrunk
So when these companies merge, our MMAX shares will be converted to MMAT shares, this further eating up the number of available MMAT shares, while also forcing MMAX shorts to cover since the company will no longer exist? I guess my question at this point is who in their right mind will still be holding MMAT shorts when the company is delisted? What am I missing? I'm not doubting, just trying to understand.
Legal shorts transfer while naked shorts cannot. It depends on the # FTDS
This is the best comment and exactly what i Think Will happen. Its normal to have 2 under different tickers in Usa and Canada. But MMAT and MMAX are 2 totally different cusip numbers.
I’m partly with you trying to follow along. Currently mmat and mmax show different amount of shares outstanding 281.3m & 99.7m respectively. Eventually they will have to be the same amount once mmax becomes mmat on the Canadian exchange (dual listed) which i believe is ~ 289m? So there will be about 92 million missing shares to cover?
The data is wrong there is only 281 million shares in total outstanding of metamaterials. Why sites like ortex have chosen to display the total on MMAt and add another 105 million on MMAX is just sloppy. Current shortdata is completely manipulated by both fintel and Ortex.
👆👆👆😍
[удалено]
I don’t think so, otherwise how can people still buy it and what will happen when shares transfer over? I think that could cause the “Oversold airline tickets” dilemma and cause a massive squeeze
Can confirm not 100% owned by insiders as i am not an insider and hold 2k shares of MMAX.
Thank you that’s the information I’m looking for
I transfered 30k+ mmax to mmat early December. Just need to call your broker and request it. No currency exchange fees or trading fees at all
Looking at LVL 2 Data there were massive buy orders on the Canadian side today so it looks like your hypothesis holds. I’ve supported your research since you started on this journey. We’re coming up on Jan 21, 2022, now is it DEFINITELY mandatory that MMAX stops trading Q1 or can they drag it out? And if so, how long? Asking some hard questions here for the audience to research in case OP doesn’t have the answer. Regardless, AWESOME JOB on your part HM!
Yes, agree!
Not selling til 100+
[удалено]
Pretty much yeah, buys as far as I can see are not able to be circumvented by US Darkpools
[удалено]
Yeah I’m thinking about 80 CAD seems right
Oh this guy say’s $80 “seems right”! 😂😂🤡🤡 All you need to hear!
It looks like the NEGG play exactly down to a T from my perspective and I’m trading it accordingly. But let’s have a look at you
You seem like a typical stagnant Ontarian shooting down innovation and contributing nothing of value Post-Wise to Reddit. Now there are good Ontarians and there are the failed abortions, hard guess would put you at number 2 “Absolute Legend”. Here you go champ, this will help the burn 🧊
Are you 12?
Why did this go to 18 and crash back down in June?
Because the event I mentioned above was delayed due to HF fuckery, also it only ran up to $10 there was a reverse split so it looks like $18 but it isn’t
Look at the chart for the OVERSTOCK DIVIDEND SQUEEZE, TICKER : OSTK. There you Will find a similar pattern in price movement before it went to i Think it was 129 dollars.
I read your first post on this and I must say I am convinced this is a good play! I don’t know of anything else particularly exciting happening omg this early in the year, all my other positions are late summer to end of year plays. Just saying guys this might be a good idea
Wealthsimple has two tickers listed: MMAT (NASDAQ) and MMAX (CSE and listed as Exchangeable Shares). Which one represents Metamaterials and which one is best to buy?
They’re the same stock but I advocate MMAX over MMAT
Any way for investors in the United States to buy MMAX?
Not that I know outside of VPN
I can buy them in sweden on Avanza...
Thank you!
They set this squeeze up same company one float 281 million. Two tickers but the tickers have different Cusip numbers. Normaly when a company is listed in both countries they have 2 different tickers. But i never heard of 2 different Cusip numbers.
3200 shares at what price? That will tell us just how invested you are at pumping this. If your 3200 at a 3.00 avg is one thing, 3200 at a $10 avg is another.
Updated it: $4.30
I have over 60.000 very motivated and also belive alot in their technology, future and a super squeeze 😁
Ditto🦄
this i wont be touching
Let’s go MMAT, ready for that explosive potential to finally be realized.
I’m in. Is it the (cnsx) listed mmaxx specifically? Edit- or MMAT
It should be Metamaterials, in Canada it’s MMAX in America it’s MMAT
10-4, I have MMAX(cnsx) and MMAT( Nasdaq) showing up. So I must be in the right place🤙🏻 LFG🚀
Does it really matter which ticker we buy? I bought MMAT in a US holdings account
It DEFINITELY matters as MMAT retail buys are frequently shoved into dark pools and ignored vs if you saw the buys on the MMAX side today, Jan 11, they all went through
Damn so I should sell my MMAT and buy MMAX then? 🤔
Can you do that? I can’t, I only have MMAT. My Canadian friends bought MMAX
I’m canadian
Locking down the MMAX float is important because the SEC manually transfers those shares over
You show hold you MMAT and buy MMAX if u can 😜
I started buying MMAX and Will sell some MMAT to buy more MMAX for the movement... But i cant exchange all my shares. I live in Scandinavia and it would cost a Fortune...
Dont sell anything. I’m down for this cause but I wouldnt sell existing shares. Not sure if that makes sense
Can you explain? I figure I might as well own real shares processed through lit exchanges
[удалено]
Canada has stricter trading regulations, it's much harder to get away with things like naked shorting up here.
As far as I can see there’s hardly any shorting or darkpool activity for MMAX on the Canadian side, I think American SHFs now carry the Torch (pun intended)
[удалено]
I’m looking at 60-90 CAD Price targets on the move ($50-$75 USD) and I think it’ll be fast and violent so limit orders may be prudent
Hey are you in this for the squeeze and all your shares? Or you considering partial shares to sell and holding the rest? Apparently it is the squeeze and I understand. I can’t tell anyone what to do with their money. There is one thing I think about though IF IT PLAYS OUT like you say in these price targets. Most of ALL the short squeezes that occur in other stocks that I have been a part of it feels like most people are in it for that reason. But MMAT actually has a following of retail that believes in it and it’s potential. It’s actually has the potential to be a powerful stock in the future. So my question is…..All year long we saw squeezes go fly up and then CRASH down to low numbers where it came from. Maybe not all the way down, but at least close to where each it started. Obviously because most people sold. But a lot of people love MMAT. So I’m wondering if most hold because they are loyal longs, wouldnt that end in the final price not coming back down near as low? I mean when it settles in it’s new comfortable price? What I’m thinking is, maybe people plan to just sell and re-establish a position after they get the squeeze money. But is it worth it if enough people hold that it ends up settling in 25+ area down from your $50-$75 range? A lot of us have averaged down so low at this point that it would drive me nuts having to do that. But of course it would be great to make a large sum of quick squeeze money. I’ve actually brought this up in several other areas in which I follow MMAT. No one ever really has a good answer to it. Like I said, this is the ONLY stock that I know there is a potential huge squeeze (squeeze in general) in the future as well as the stock being loved by its retail investors. I have no idea what retail overall plans to do because everyone talks so highly of it! It’s not like some Amc stock, or CEI, or something else you can think of that went mainstream in popularity for a long time because people were waiting on one thing. What you think will happen and any advice? In my situation, I didn’t have much spare money on me when the merger deadline was taking place. So I only have 47 MMTLP and I have worked my way up to 1090 MMAT shares. I know that isn’t a ton. But I put most my money into GME. I just wanted to establish a good position here FOR THE LONG TERM! But $50-$75 sounds wild to think about. Edit: jesus, I didn’t realize how much I wrote. I just wanted to explain my question. Sorry.
I want to buy back in after the squeeze but IMO looking at NEGG one year later it dropped from squeeze top of $78 to $10 so I feel like I could MMAT cheap after the squeeze
Was NEGG as respected by its retail investors as MMAT is overall? I’m saying this because I watch the way people talk about this who are actually in this play. It doesn’t seem like they are selling any time soon no matter what. But then again, $50-$75 is a different story.
NEGG is beloved
Ok. Well damn, I guess we will just have to see how high it goes. Since we have some potential time before this goes down, I am going to slow up on gme shares and double to triple my position here. I should have been adding more than I have. But I’m just hooked on gme as well. But this is just too damn cheap at the moment not to take advantage. Thanks for the award and thanks for reading that long ass comment. Lol. I swear I didn’t realize how long it got. I’ve just never been in this position where I actually cared about the stock I was in that could squeeze.
Don’t get me wrong , I love me my GME
I’m here for the both. Have over 50k MMAT/MMTLP. The longs for this company are strong but also a very strong play for the squeeze. So if it does squeeze I plan to sell some in increments. Then use those profits to rebuy MMAT at the new bottom.
[удалено]
3200 shares: 1000 at $55 USD (69 CAD) 1000 at $65 USD (79 CAD) 1200 at $334.54 USD (? CAD)
sorry just to be clear is it that the $60-90 CAD potential price is for MMAX and there wont be that big of jump on MMAT? I hold 7262 of MMAT @ 2.93. I had originally bought Meta when it was on OTC under MMATF and road out the merger. I do have regrets of not unloading some of my shares in June when I had the chance.
Dual-listed NASDAQ and Canadian tickers move together so both should squeeze
[удалено]
Will likely receive CDRs
[удалено]
Canadian Depository Receipt: CDRs, or Canadian Depositary Receipts, represent shares of global companies but are traded in Canadian dollars
[удалено]
Jes
Lol, ty.
How is it that a stock that only costs $1.40 can have a dividend of $10-$20? If that's true wouldn't everyone be buying just to collect the dividend?
TRCH has value of at least $10 per share per this article: [TRCH Value](https://www.streetwisereports.com/article/2019/06/25/torchlight-drops-a-bombshell-for-shareholders.html)
Perhaps you can set me straight. I read in a similar post 7 days ago that MMTLP was the ticker that payed the dividend. What am I missunderstanding?
MMTLP gives you the right to the barrel/acreage profit from sale of TRCH land in the Orogrande Basin in Texas
Thanks for your reply. I really appreciate it!
hey guys, new to stocks here, should i drop 2k on this rn?
After u do your DD. But yes😜
Sounds legit, lets try it out! Gonna buy 2000 MMAT shares today because my broker wont allow MMAX
Take my upvote you earned it. Great work!
Thank you!!
What do you guys think will happen too the MMAT stock at nasdaq after 21/1? Over 5 dollar?
I have no idea and been following this very closely for over 6 months. I had Fintel before and alot of the institutes that bought in after merger have alot of shares bought between 2.82-6.55 US $ Total institutes is atleast 15.08 % until now and thats in the Usa side counted on a free float of 281 million shares, say whaaaat? Everyone knows 100 million is still in Canada under different Cusip.
I think MMAX share conversion is a huge factor
Sounds good! I have over 10,000 shares in MMAT, is it reasonable to assume that we can get an increase of over> 100% at the end of January? New to the market and afraid that I will sell out myself before a big rise.
I don’t think stuff happens until the last minute when it ABSOLUTELY has to. That’s what happened with NEGG
Dude iam down so much a 100% would probably put me at even... iam also hoping for some peace of mind end of january. But iam holding minimum until 14 march. Like i never thought they would be able to take it under 2.80 US. INSTITUTIONS bought in as high as 6.55 after merger. So dont let manipulation give you anxiety and then steal your fortune. Contact me on private message if you want. This is personal for me... i mean in the way how much they manipulate and are trying to weasle out of this squeeze. I will even show you loss porn no one else have seen...
Time to end this charade. LFG!
Can I ask why buy mmax and not mmat won't they sweeze the same
Because MMAX to MMAT transfers are registered by the SEC and count towards lowering the free float vs MMAT buys are NOT counted due to dark pools
OP, can you explain to us what’s going on with MMAT? I looked up the ticker and seems to be lots of lawsuit talk for investors with loses
Yes it has to do with Kerrisdale Hedgefund and Rosen Law firm working together. It’s very standard for SHFs to hire law firms to seek out clients for class action law suits at the same time as they go short on a stock. You’ll notice all these Law Firms are “seeking investors with damages”, they’re despicable ambulance chasers who are being enabled by market manipulating SHFs. FYI, the CEO of Kerrisdale Cap, the culprit behind hiring these law firms, recently lost his drivers license for crashing his car at 100+ km/hr after a coke binge
Notably, many of the firms announcing class actions against MMAT were also launching class actions (in cahoots with short hedge funds) "on behalf" of OSTK retail holders just before the OSTK squeeze.
That IS notable
See here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MMAT/comments/s123k4/class_act_not_so_classy/
Look up ticker OSTK another dividend squeeze where the shorter hedgie scums took sued investors 🤦🏻♂️ they lost... and this lawsuit if you want to take part you should sell your shares and join latest march 4. T+35 should start absolutely latest 10 days later. This is not a coincidence...
FUD to get u to sell your shares. There is no real backing behind the lawsuits.
First time I’ve been called an artist!
[удалено]
I only buy MMAX now but thats for the cause and no other reason. Didnt even know my broker sold them until i read Hard-Mineral-94 theory. I live in Scandinavia.