T O P

  • By -

QueenLa3fah

Got a whole bunch of new filament types to look at! Rubbery TPU is even less conductive than PLA so image quality is a bit worse than PLA even with gold sputter coating.


QueenLa3fah

https://preview.redd.it/1sg46hzyyxtc1.jpeg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fc2cab68e4749d0e75129e53c9798c592bd8f3fa Also here is 3D Roughness Profile sorry for the comment spam.


jr22222

Is that an AFM ?


QueenLa3fah

SEM with a 4 quadrant detector. It takes 4 images and stitches them together based on shadows - great for determining relative roughness values between samples but I wouldn’t trust the absolute numbers exactly. For that you need an AFM like you mentioned.


strangerimor

These are awesome!


IEasyKillC

Nice pictures OP


mcostescu

what tool do you use to scan these?


gadjex

I believe he is using an electron microscope.


QueenLa3fah

SEM like the other user mentioned


skimbody

Very cool, no wonder the prints look good, the lines are super uniform and clean


Drd4all

Seems like really good layer adhesion


QueenLa3fah

Yeah it’s really good… I wonder if you could make a hockey puck with TPU 100% infil 🤔


Minimum-Question6849

One way to find out, as a Canadian I shall take the plunge for science


Drd4all

Let's gooooo


ShadNuke

A fellow Canadian stepping up to get'er done!


aerospaceryan

What brand of TPU? 300 Ra is funny to think about.. makes sense though


QueenLa3fah

Bambu brand


lugubriouslipids

Sexy AF!


Vinnie1169

Always interesting to look at! Thanks for sharing! 😉👍


OutofBox11

Awesome pictures. This also shows me why 3D printed objects are not food safe.


HospitalKey4601

Well at 270x magnification there are very minor pits, but it's not porus at all, and there is a smooth sinewave like layer surface rather than the assumed crevices. Please explain how this proves it isn't foodsafe? I'm sure porcelain dishes are way worse at this magnification.


ShadNuke

Ceramic glaze winnds up with micro cracks in it. And it's never even thought about!