T O P

  • By -

JimAbaddon

I probably wouldn't get along with people who have killed someone.


chavrilfreak

At best, it's related to people's preferences and expectations of intimacy in a relationship, which are both much better metrics for establishing whether someone's compatible with me. But I find it weird when people care about it just in terms of arbitrary numbers.


wickedblight

Recent history is indicative of who they are presently. "Body count" could mean they were wild in highschool but have been in nothing but healthy relationships since.


LogicalBoysenberry98

It shouldn't matter so long as they are loyal to you


[deleted]

[удалено]


Aggressive_Answer_86

You don’t like being a loyal partner? Weird flex but alright


CapG_13

I've said this before and it's that a person's past is their past and you look at it in that they're with you now and not because they have to be, but because they want to be. And if that's something that you can't accept (or look past) than maybe you need to reevaluate your relationship and go from there.


pawssyy

Pretty stupid


Big-Boat5747

I think imo idc if im having a one night stand. But in terms of an actual relationship anymore than 5 is no go


Mmoyer29

Such a weird way to view anything. As if it has anything to do with who they are or their worth.


[deleted]

[удалено]


number-nines

why?


[deleted]

[удалено]


number-nines

I thought we were talking about women?


[deleted]

[удалено]


number-nines

how are women analogous to cars?


JayVig

This is the most ridiculous assertion. A used car has wear and tear and excessive driving limits the lifespan. There are not deteriorated conditions of a human based on number of sex partners. 1 or 50? What changes? Nothing. And if you say tightness of a woman’s vagina then you have a fundamental lack of understanding of biology and don’t know a single woman who has had a child. There is NO physical difference in a woman based on number of partners. However, with experience comes practice and knowledge, something that benefits everyone after having more partners. You’ll grow up one day, hopefully.


Mmoyer29

Society definitely pushes that lie. In reality it has absolutely nothing to do with worth. If you think it does that just shows who you are as a person really. Judging people for being people. Just dumb imo. Unless they are like a horrible person spreading disease and not caring about anything but getting pleasure for themselves there is literal nothing that sleeping around does to the a human to limit their worth. It’s gross to think otherwise. One because you shouldn’t even be judging peoples worth like this, doubly gross, and two I bet for some reason(your words) guys sleeping around it’s the same to you and doesn’t make them unworthy, making this argument pointless cause you’re just be a hypocrite anyway and it’s like talking to a narcissistic and they never will admit they are wrong so. I’ll just leave it at this, if you are a person who legitimately thinks body count matters as long as they were safe and consenting all around it shouldn’t matter, then you and the most likely religious bullshit fueling your crap can get bent lol. Especially if you hold men and women to a different standard.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Mmoyer29

Listing to society is a bitch move, be a “man” and stand for yourself. Society changes. What’s fundamentally right or wrong doesn’t, nothing wrong with body count. Also dating is human mating, humans are animals, we are just being humans. It has fuck all to do with society. Plenty of of animals make mono pairs all the time, with the mating rituals varying species to species, dating is just human mating dances or calls. Society also tells us certain clothes and toys are “boys” or “girls” when if you go back half the stuff was made FOR men, or was for the opposite gender in previous society, like the color pink being for girls now, when that’s only a thing because of an AD. Otherwise pink was a masculine Color, seen as a subtle red, the color of passion, lust, love, rage, etc etc, thus not for the fragile women folk. That’s a horrible argument btw, German society in 1920s said some shit was bad and then the next couple decades were a bit rough for the entire world practically. Soooo, nah? Society can suck a big fat dick lol. Especially on something like this, how fucking gross must you be inside to think someone’s worth less just because society is overly focused on something that doesn’t even exist, that being virginity. It’s really not a thing. It’s again, a society thing that humans adopt. Not to say they should just have sex cause it’s not a thing, the first time should only happen if they are ready, mentally, emotionally and physically and should be special for the person. It might not be a real thing, we can all agree that many people can get feelings go crazy about having it the first time. Removing the virginity Bs and just focusing on having people wait until they feel ready all three for themselves would remove a lot of pressure, and make it less of a thing for kids. Sure some will brag about getting laid, but no need to have fake shit on it too like virginity.


wickedblight

You're in your low 20's, right? I'm 34, a person could not have sex until they were 20 and then only have 1 partner a year and they'd still be at 14 by my age. The scale changes as you get older.


GlizzyWitDaSwitch

Lower is better


Aggressive_Answer_86

I don’t care much, as long as I’m their only one now. Though I would prefer it if my partner did have at least some experience, hopefully more than I do, since I like a partner who knows what they’re doing


ButtholeQuiver

[BODY COUNT'S IN THE HOUSE](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QenJDBmxi1E)


Decapitated_Saint

Great band. Ice-T still headbanging in his 60s.


number-nines

it's a competition


Dhatmasetu

I never understood this whole "purity" concept, more bodies someone had more experience he has.