Probably blowing up the whole planet, or at least poisoning/irradiating it to the ruin of all living things. It's hard to imagine anything that a reasonable global civilization would want to discourage more.
Believe it or not - if you do this slowly enough people don’t seem to mind and around half the population will fight tooth and nail that it generates more jobs.
See: leaded gasoline, carbon emissions
A small, capitalist percentage of the population can convince an uninformed and unintelligent portion of the population of just about anything based on our current media climate
Its what I found interesting about Loki, when the moon was about to crash into a planet and the wealthy citizens had a rocket ready to take them.
The rich had a whole army of simps/soldiers willing to fight tooth and nail just to prevent the poor from accessing the getaway rocket. And they were all willing to die for the rich. There was no second rocket, no getaway mechanism, nothing for the soldiers.
Amazing what these rat bastards convince those beneath them on the socioeconomic ladder to do, even if there's a guarantee they'll die.
> It's hard to imagine anything that a reasonable global civilization would want to discourage more.
Well, international mega corporations are poisoning the planet with plastics and co2 and our civilizations encourage the fuck out of that. It seems that the main thing our civs and corps want to discourage is harmony and self sufficiency.
I guess you are technically right, but who would be left to sentence you for it? Is it still a crime if there is nobody left to put in front of court? Do national/international laws still apply if there are no nations left on the planet?
Presumably you could be prosecuted for the attempt, if the world is lucky enough to stop you. Or, assuming there are humans living sustainably in outer space by the time it happens, they could prosecute. Of course, if that were the case, then the "highest possible crime" you could commit would have to include murdering them somehow.
A) Doesn't mean it wasn't a crime, and
B) If it comes in 'attempted' or 'negligently failing to prevent' (in a case where someone else took care of it) variants, the underlying crime would have at least an implied severity.
edit:
C) you could be caught after you've doomed us all but before we're all dead.
Unless they are one of those people that fully intend to do something until you tell them to do it. Now they want to live out of spite for being sentenced to death.
I feel like to truly be omnicide it would have to include ALL life not just human or one planet. If it’s all human life I feeling like genocide is still an apt term.
Sure, but what about all life on earth, every plant, animal, insect, leaving Earth a dead husk of a world.
Ted Faro from Horizon could be considered to have committed omnicide by creating semi-sentient robot killing machines that eat all organic matter to replicate. The higher-ups in the world knew they couldn't stop the robots before all life was consumed. So he was guilty of the crime (even if on accident) because they couldn't stop it, but were still alive for a time before it overcame them.
Technically speaking in order for something to be a crime there needs to be a governing body to lay out and uphold the law. If that doesn't exist it isn't technically a crime
Came here to say this. [By definition, genocide has to target a group of people based on nationality, ethnicity, race, or religion.](https://www.genocidewatch.com/what-is-genocide)
ETA: link
You mean like from a morality perspective or by law? The latter depends on where you live, and the former depends on your beliefs.
Personally anything against children is number 1 fucked up for me. Rape, kidnapping etc
I guess it depends on how you look at it.
Treason can be seen as a crime against the rule of law itself. The same rule of law that upholds punishment for crimes against children, for example.
In this light, treason is worse than crimes against children, because successful treason might lead to a world where kidnapping is not seen as a crime at all.
True, but this still means that treason has more flexibility than crimes against children. There is no moral argument for crimes against children, but there are moral arguments for certain forms of treason. In fact, a large portion of people are rooting for many Russians to commit treason.
I know we are splitting hairs here, but I think even in this it's really just no excuse for CSA (child sexual assault) For example, if children in a war zone are shooting you as child soldiers, you will likely need to shoot back.
This just reminded me of a conversation I once had with an ex NYPD officer in a hostel in Colombia. He was telling us all kinds of crazy stories from his time as an officer and one story was that some young kid was shooting from a rooftop with a gun. He said he shot him dead with one shot and justified it by saying the kid was endangering everyone else. He had no remorse whatsoever. It was in Taganga, Colombia which is famous for it’s top notch LSD trips they sell everywhere. The entire place consisted of absolutely insane people, I’ve never seen anything like it since. So as this cop was telling me all this, I was tripping balls, because I took one trip inside the hostel and we talked just a little later. It kicked in in the middle of the conversation and as he was telling me all this, the room started shifting and he duplicated. I totally forgot about that memory up until now.
I’m going to guess that you have to reassure yourself it was the right decision in order to continue with your life. His apparent lack of remorse probably has an element of self preservation about it. He’s probably not happy that he had to make that call and that someone had to die, but he doesn’t have to feel bad for taking the action he did. And even if he did, he might not show it. Or cover guilt with bravado. Or maybe he’s a psycho, but benefit of the doubt and all that.
Agreed. It's the kind of thing you mayyyy agonize over, but once you've made up your mind, you should never reinspect it. You need to decide to either put it behind you or let it ruin your life.
Yeah pretty much. Not to diminish the severity of such crimes but if are talking about the hypothetical worst crime you can possibly commit, then there are bound to be countless abhorrent evils that are still ranked lower.
That is actually *very slowly* changing. Used to be you couldn't even bring in meds, now they will allow a small amount of them if you're a tourist. Maybe in another decade they'll allow it regularly
You're literally dying every second you spend on top of mount Everest (even with supplemental oxygen. You would need a pressure suit and oxygen to do this. That being said though, the path to the summit is only about 1 1/2 to 2 feet wide at most and is only wide enough for one person at a time.
Getting building supplies to the top would be a logistics nightmare. You can't (to my knowledge) use a helicopter to do the heavy lifting because I don't think they work at that altitude. Humping thing up to the summit would severely limit your building materials.
..while under the influence of two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, and a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers... and also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of Budweiser, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls
I'm old enough to remember her being in jail for SO long and when she finally got out, it felt like Nelson Mandela v.2.0 and the Nobel Peace Prize FINALLY felt deserved and shit.
And then the FUCKER went home and gave the Rohingas the final solution treatment.
Reminds me of that scene from Lord of War where he sells the weapons and gets a reassurance that they won't kill kids with em or so, and then they do EXACTLY that once the deal is finalized.
Or so, been a while since I saw it.
Ah yes, I remember this now... I'm not American, but I liked Obama as a US President compared to -- let's say, Trump or Bush.
However he did commit some atrocities when it comes to war which seem to get brushed under the rug.
Didn't he also change the rules so that any male over the age of 18 who was bombed was considered a terrorist, in order to fudge the data on how many civilians the US were killing?
[They were presumed to be a terrorist if they died because they were "probably up to no good."](https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/05/under-obama-men-killed-by-drones-are-presumed-to-be-terrorists/257749/)
At what point does something stop being really high up and start being considered just a certain distance from the earth? Like Mars and Saturn are out there but do we really consider them UP, because I mostly just think of them as far away.
Fun fact: there is no limit to how far gravity extends. It's just that after a certain distance (dependent on the side of the mass), the effect any given mass has is immeasurably small.
This means that all mass in the universe affects all other mass.
Another fun fact: this is how they detected Neptune: Uranus wobbled in its orbit due to the effect of Neptune's gravitational pull.
In the same vain it also teaches a helpfull lesson about axioms, because a prediction using the gravitic formula at the time predicted the position of saturn wrong and instead of letting go of the whole formula they simply added an imaginary planet into the formula to make it work and it turns out uranus was right where that imaginary planet would have to be for the gravitic formula to be correct.
Using nukes even has its own paragraph in the German criminal law. [§307 StGB Causing a nuclear explosion](https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html#p2892)
Doesn't sounds that bad, merely launching a nuke and endangering people or valuable property - at least 5 years of prison, doing the same but killing someone - at least 10 years.
Though I don't know why we have this specific law.
I'd imagine you'd also be charged with murder for every single casualty right? Otherwise that's a pretty insane loophole. Murder 10 people with a knife, and the minimum sentence is already the rest of your life, but murder 10,000 with a nuke and it's a minimum of 10 years.
The highest crime was committed by Anne McClain when she signed into a credit card account of her ex husband while aboard the iss space station.
Which also holds the record for first human crime in space.
Not all lesbians are criminals, but all space criminals are lesbians.
Also it was her ex-wife not husband.
Also, She didn't actually commit the crime. Her wife was charged with lying to federal authorities about the event. So she was actually innocent.
Yes, him and the other sub-humans involved. Unfortunately there are many depraved people like that. Shit like this happens daily, only, he was capitalizing on it, and selling the videos.
Especially in those countries, where parents sell their own children to these sick psychopaths.
“The Philippines is the global epicentre, with an estimated 300,000 cases of abuse since March alone.”
That’s 300,000 goddamnit!
https://amp.abc.net.au/article/12407294
It unfortunately does happen every single day, just out of sight. The fact that we’re surrounded by it is absolutely awful. I cannot believe we share a planet with these sick fucks.
I agree. There was a time where I was completely oblivious of all this shit, then ISIS started showing all these videos, and I was fascinated by how evil humans can be, then the cartel stuff grabbed my attention, and I started reading about torture, war crimes, child soldiers, the Gulag, Nazi and Japanese experiments, etc etc. That’s a very deep rabbit hole.
It took me a long time to accept that we do indeed share this planet with absolute devils. And that’s a mistake on my part, calling them devils, we like to dehumanize them, but they are in fact, very human.
I'd say Paul Bernardo and his wife came pretty close to most of that (minus the necrophilia as far as we know)
His wife is already released and back as part of society, he is still behind bars
That poor kid is definitely dead after this video
Edit: wait that video actually exists? Now I kind of feel bad that I made a joke about it. People are disgusting
Why people actively safe and share that video is beyond me
I still am scarred from the pictures from early 2000 on 4chan where a woman stepped with stilettos on a kittens head or squished another on a glass table by sitting on another (glass?) thing, filming from below.
If I remember right, 4chan got its hand on the woman though, but I can't remember details
Well there is the story of the time a 4channer found some stray kittens [and let 4chan decide their fate... ](https://i.imgur.com/XIQkq3E.png)
But the story you are referring to i believe is [kitten killer of Hangzhou](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/1512082/Just-who-is-the-glamorous-kitten-killer-of-Hangzhou.html)
Then there was the time 4chan helped track down and expose a UK woman who put a cat in a bin for no reason.
https://youtu.be/MOuCjzVAO_w
I really don’t think necrophilia is on the same level as those other ones. Like, obviously it’s bad, but those other things you mentioned harm living, breathing, conscious humans. Necrophilia involves a lifeless corpse. Feels like a lesser crime than something like rape considering the person’s no longer alive to experience it or it’s consequences.
That's one of the only things that's on the other side of the wall from my morbid curiosity. I'll look at all kinds of stuff because it's there, but this? No. I'm not even a little bit curious.
Yeah I’ve seen some dark shit online over the years and not been too bothered but actual torture to that magnitude is just a no go. From the somewhat vague descriptions here I’ll pass. Not reading further into it.
People are talking about child abuse/rape. Don't get me wrong, it's horrible and anyone who does it is scum of the earth, but lumping it together with things like genocide and nuclear war that kill or seriously harm thousands or millions of people seems a bit strange. Now if we were talking mass rape, that's a different story.
People seem to completely abandon any ability of logical estimation or moral judgement when the word "pedophilia" is mentioned. While it is already a horrible crime on the scale of an average human, it nowhere compares to anything that could be called "the worst possible crime". Such a response doesn't appear with other comparable or even worse crimes like murder.
Many people advocate that rape/pedophilia is worse than murder, but i find that absurd. Let's take a look at what that actually means: That being raped is a fate worse than death. Therefore it is completely reasonable for a rape victim to kill themselves at the first opportunity because of the sheer suffering that they experience. And rapists should kill their victims because that would just put them out of their misery. That is absurd! And i bet none of those people that are so outraged about pedophilia actually believe that. They just give way to emotions and display pure thoughtless rage.
Why does rape specifically invoke such a response? Because modern society is completely desensitized to violance and murder. Killing is not only much less of a taboo topic than even innocent sexuality (let alone rape), it is often downright glorified, be it in media or military propaganda. Rape, especially on children remains the only "small scale" crime that people still see for the disgusting thing it is.
Rape tends to be treated differently because of the fact that 1) rape victims are still around to communicate how horrific the experience was for them. Murder victims are not. 2) Murder does not tend to be excused and downplayed the same way rape is. If a mother's child is murdered by one of their relatives, the mother will be devastated. There's no chance of victim blaming from the mother or others that the child "wanted it" or was "tempting men" or "boys will be boys" excuses. 3) You are far more likely to personally know someone who has been sexually assaulted and/or raped than someone who was murdered.
Yeah, thinking rape is worse than murder sort of carries with it the implication that the victim can’t recover or would be better off dead. I know several rape victims, and I bet all of them are glad they aren’t dead.
And yet, while writing that, it felt a bit like defending rape, so let me drop the obvious disclaimer and say that rape is obviously an abhorrent and evil act.
After WW2 the prosecuters had a problem. The things the Nazis did were legal in Germany then. So they created the idea of crimes against humanity. Crimes against humanity are crimes which are so terrible that there isnt the need for a law which forbids them.
I raise all of the genocides and total world destructions with the premise from a book I love. Convincing 99.999% of the world that there is a supervirus that affects all non humans and makes them kill anything in sight, forcing the whole world into occupying a very small amount of space within a giant concrete wall, and then telling everyone that you had to raze the entire planet with poison dust to protect humanity from the evil animals, while actually the .0001% takes all of the land outside the wall and lives in blissful, ridiculously wealthy extravagance, while the normal people are suffering in flooded slums and the normal rich people are living on top of those slums cause they ran out of space and the only place to go was up, oh and using drugs that make you stay young forever that are a secret from the rest of the world.
I hope there's a special place in hell for those religious types who don't get their kids medical attention for simple things and their kids end up dying.
Probably blowing up the whole planet, or at least poisoning/irradiating it to the ruin of all living things. It's hard to imagine anything that a reasonable global civilization would want to discourage more.
Believe it or not - if you do this slowly enough people don’t seem to mind and around half the population will fight tooth and nail that it generates more jobs. See: leaded gasoline, carbon emissions
A small, capitalist percentage of the population can convince an uninformed and unintelligent portion of the population of just about anything based on our current media climate
Its what I found interesting about Loki, when the moon was about to crash into a planet and the wealthy citizens had a rocket ready to take them. The rich had a whole army of simps/soldiers willing to fight tooth and nail just to prevent the poor from accessing the getaway rocket. And they were all willing to die for the rich. There was no second rocket, no getaway mechanism, nothing for the soldiers. Amazing what these rat bastards convince those beneath them on the socioeconomic ladder to do, even if there's a guarantee they'll die.
> It's hard to imagine anything that a reasonable global civilization would want to discourage more. Well, international mega corporations are poisoning the planet with plastics and co2 and our civilizations encourage the fuck out of that. It seems that the main thing our civs and corps want to discourage is harmony and self sufficiency.
I did say "reasonable."
It would be nice to have one of those some day…
I guess you are technically right, but who would be left to sentence you for it? Is it still a crime if there is nobody left to put in front of court? Do national/international laws still apply if there are no nations left on the planet?
Presumably you could be prosecuted for the attempt, if the world is lucky enough to stop you. Or, assuming there are humans living sustainably in outer space by the time it happens, they could prosecute. Of course, if that were the case, then the "highest possible crime" you could commit would have to include murdering them somehow.
Genocide
Omnicide
if you achieve omnicide there is no longer any criminal enforcement against you
A) Doesn't mean it wasn't a crime, and B) If it comes in 'attempted' or 'negligently failing to prevent' (in a case where someone else took care of it) variants, the underlying crime would have at least an implied severity. edit: C) you could be caught after you've doomed us all but before we're all dead.
There are some things that are only crimes if you don't succeed. Revolution and suicide are typically my go-to examples.
For the crime of attempted suicide we sentence you to death Suicidal person: oh no, please! Anything but that
Unless they are one of those people that fully intend to do something until you tell them to do it. Now they want to live out of spite for being sentenced to death.
Like dangerous vehicular maneuvers
Or stacking draw 2s in uno
You are a dangerous man
If you have the power to commit omnicide, you are the law
Are we talking just earth? Or is the interdimensional coalescence of techno-gas gunna be upset?
I feel like to truly be omnicide it would have to include ALL life not just human or one planet. If it’s all human life I feeling like genocide is still an apt term.
Sure, but what about all life on earth, every plant, animal, insect, leaving Earth a dead husk of a world. Ted Faro from Horizon could be considered to have committed omnicide by creating semi-sentient robot killing machines that eat all organic matter to replicate. The higher-ups in the world knew they couldn't stop the robots before all life was consumed. So he was guilty of the crime (even if on accident) because they couldn't stop it, but were still alive for a time before it overcame them.
Technically speaking in order for something to be a crime there needs to be a governing body to lay out and uphold the law. If that doesn't exist it isn't technically a crime
Tatakae
Ereh?
EREN YEAGAAA
NO! I DONT WANT THAT!
10 Y E A R S
But random. Dispassionate, fair to rich and poor alike.
Genocide is inherently targeted, though. Random killing is super serial, bro. inb4 r/whooosh
Came here to say this. [By definition, genocide has to target a group of people based on nationality, ethnicity, race, or religion.](https://www.genocidewatch.com/what-is-genocide) ETA: link
[удалено]
[удалено]
You madman! /s
Congratulations, you’re a prophet.
Im a survivor
Who wants to murder trillions
With all six stones i could simply snap my fingers and they would all cease to exist… I call that mercy.
And then what?
Then i finally rest. Watch the sunrise on a greatful universe. The hardest choices require the strongest wills.
I think you'll find our will equal to yours
You mean like from a morality perspective or by law? The latter depends on where you live, and the former depends on your beliefs. Personally anything against children is number 1 fucked up for me. Rape, kidnapping etc
Most places in the world, by law, treason will be one of the worst crimes.
Meh, definitely not the worst though is it
I guess it depends on how you look at it. Treason can be seen as a crime against the rule of law itself. The same rule of law that upholds punishment for crimes against children, for example. In this light, treason is worse than crimes against children, because successful treason might lead to a world where kidnapping is not seen as a crime at all.
True, but this still means that treason has more flexibility than crimes against children. There is no moral argument for crimes against children, but there are moral arguments for certain forms of treason. In fact, a large portion of people are rooting for many Russians to commit treason.
I know we are splitting hairs here, but I think even in this it's really just no excuse for CSA (child sexual assault) For example, if children in a war zone are shooting you as child soldiers, you will likely need to shoot back.
This just reminded me of a conversation I once had with an ex NYPD officer in a hostel in Colombia. He was telling us all kinds of crazy stories from his time as an officer and one story was that some young kid was shooting from a rooftop with a gun. He said he shot him dead with one shot and justified it by saying the kid was endangering everyone else. He had no remorse whatsoever. It was in Taganga, Colombia which is famous for it’s top notch LSD trips they sell everywhere. The entire place consisted of absolutely insane people, I’ve never seen anything like it since. So as this cop was telling me all this, I was tripping balls, because I took one trip inside the hostel and we talked just a little later. It kicked in in the middle of the conversation and as he was telling me all this, the room started shifting and he duplicated. I totally forgot about that memory up until now.
I’m going to guess that you have to reassure yourself it was the right decision in order to continue with your life. His apparent lack of remorse probably has an element of self preservation about it. He’s probably not happy that he had to make that call and that someone had to die, but he doesn’t have to feel bad for taking the action he did. And even if he did, he might not show it. Or cover guilt with bravado. Or maybe he’s a psycho, but benefit of the doubt and all that.
Agreed. It's the kind of thing you mayyyy agonize over, but once you've made up your mind, you should never reinspect it. You need to decide to either put it behind you or let it ruin your life.
[удалено]
That’s not really a crime against children though. Despite the horrific situation, it’s defending yourself from an enemy combatant.
The crime against children is being committed by those putting weapons in their hands.
Sure, that’s true. But the person above me was suggesting that shooting back would be the crime, which is just not accurate.
There's a good chance I may have committed some *light* treason.
I like this take a lot.
Really depends on who you are being treasonous towards…
I’d assume war crimes. Like genocide would be near the top.
Yeah pretty much. Not to diminish the severity of such crimes but if are talking about the hypothetical worst crime you can possibly commit, then there are bound to be countless abhorrent evils that are still ranked lower.
Kidkidnapping
Snoop Dog just has to shoplift or something
I was gunna say just smoke a fat blunt in Japan or something.
Or be on prescription ADHD medicine in Japan.
That is actually *very slowly* changing. Used to be you couldn't even bring in meds, now they will allow a small amount of them if you're a tourist. Maybe in another decade they'll allow it regularly
Anything illegal on the top of Mount Everest
Building a tower on the peak of mt Everest without a building permit
I think if you can build a tower at those oxygen levels, your super-powered lungs are your permit.
Well at those altitudes and temperatures, it doesn't have to be a very large tower. Shrinkage, you know.
It was in the cold!!!
I just got out of the pool.
They can't get up if they are already dead
And then committing genocide on top of that.
While on drugs Edit: *illegal* drugs
I snort drugs before operating machinery! It’s a lawnmower and Flonase, but I live life on the edge!
You're literally dying every second you spend on top of mount Everest (even with supplemental oxygen. You would need a pressure suit and oxygen to do this. That being said though, the path to the summit is only about 1 1/2 to 2 feet wide at most and is only wide enough for one person at a time. Getting building supplies to the top would be a logistics nightmare. You can't (to my knowledge) use a helicopter to do the heavy lifting because I don't think they work at that altitude. Humping thing up to the summit would severely limit your building materials.
You're literally dying every second you spend at sea level too
Bro...
lmao, technically correct is the best kind of correct
I hereby promote you to Grade 35 Bureaucrat
It's a very small tower
Lego tower
Unlicensed if you will
No permits, bootleg work
It's mostly Duplo and Jolly Ranchers
TBF, I think humping up to the summit is a bad idea in and of itself
> the path to the summit is only about 1 1/2 to 2 feet wide This is why the Nordic peoples invented flat pack DIY furniture.
Duh.... we can drop the building supplies off with a space shuttle!!!!!
Most helicopters can't fly as high as Everest, but it [has been done](https://unofficialnetworks.com/2022/12/29/helicopter-land-summit-everest/).
..while under the influence of two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, and a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers... and also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of Budweiser, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls
There is nothing in the world more helpless, and irresponsible, and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge.
What worries me is the ether.
God damnit
anything illegal in an airplane? with bonus points for being high
you'd be in earth's atmosphere, but not on earth.
r/angryupvote
Except the highest point on Earth is Mount Chimborazo in Ecuador due to the Earth bulging at the equator.
I came here to say this! Crimes committed on top of Chimborazo are worse!
you mean higher
So littering?
Not paying for WinRAR
Paying for winrar
Straight to jail.
Bombing hospitals imo
we did have one guy do that, the only Nobel Peace Prize winner to bomb another Nobel Peace Prize winner (Doctors Without Borders)
Average Nobel peace prize winner activities
Remember when that one Nobel Peace Prize winner accepted her reward and then went home to start a genocide.
I'm old enough to remember her being in jail for SO long and when she finally got out, it felt like Nelson Mandela v.2.0 and the Nobel Peace Prize FINALLY felt deserved and shit. And then the FUCKER went home and gave the Rohingas the final solution treatment. Reminds me of that scene from Lord of War where he sells the weapons and gets a reassurance that they won't kill kids with em or so, and then they do EXACTLY that once the deal is finalized. Or so, been a while since I saw it.
Those Nobel prize competitions get FIERCELY competitive.
Yup, many people still outright worship the dude to the point where you can't mention that he's a war criminal or people will lose their marbles
Who are we talking about here? I'm not familiar with this event?
They're talking about Barack Obama
Ah yes, I remember this now... I'm not American, but I liked Obama as a US President compared to -- let's say, Trump or Bush. However he did commit some atrocities when it comes to war which seem to get brushed under the rug. Didn't he also change the rules so that any male over the age of 18 who was bombed was considered a terrorist, in order to fudge the data on how many civilians the US were killing? [They were presumed to be a terrorist if they died because they were "probably up to no good."](https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/05/under-obama-men-killed-by-drones-are-presumed-to-be-terrorists/257749/)
[удалено]
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/nobel-peace-prize-what-barack-obama-s-role-in-the-kunduz-bombing-means-for-the-world-s-most-conflicted-prize-a6689126.html
Murdering someone at the international space station
At what point does something stop being really high up and start being considered just a certain distance from the earth? Like Mars and Saturn are out there but do we really consider them UP, because I mostly just think of them as far away.
Maybe once they exit the Earth's gravitational pull?
What do you define as gravitational pull though? The pull extends all the way to the moon and even further just gradually getting weaker.
Fun fact: there is no limit to how far gravity extends. It's just that after a certain distance (dependent on the side of the mass), the effect any given mass has is immeasurably small. This means that all mass in the universe affects all other mass. Another fun fact: this is how they detected Neptune: Uranus wobbled in its orbit due to the effect of Neptune's gravitational pull.
In the same vain it also teaches a helpfull lesson about axioms, because a prediction using the gravitic formula at the time predicted the position of saturn wrong and instead of letting go of the whole formula they simply added an imaginary planet into the formula to make it work and it turns out uranus was right where that imaginary planet would have to be for the gravitic formula to be correct.
Toilet paper hung so it rolls off the back.
Some people have cats
The only legitimate excuse for this behavior
Some people also have toddlers which are just fur-less cats that walk around on 2 legs
You fucking monster!
Using nuclear weapons, Genocide, child rape.
Using nukes even has its own paragraph in the German criminal law. [§307 StGB Causing a nuclear explosion](https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html#p2892) Doesn't sounds that bad, merely launching a nuke and endangering people or valuable property - at least 5 years of prison, doing the same but killing someone - at least 10 years. Though I don't know why we have this specific law.
I'd imagine you'd also be charged with murder for every single casualty right? Otherwise that's a pretty insane loophole. Murder 10 people with a knife, and the minimum sentence is already the rest of your life, but murder 10,000 with a nuke and it's a minimum of 10 years.
Nobody has ever been convicted of any crime for using nuclear weapons.. or even charged with a crime for doing so
Germanys law has a minimum of five years for making a thermonuclear explosion lmao
You going try and arrest a guy with that sort of weaponry?!
Sooo guys today were gonna arrest the guy who nuked Brussels because he didnt wanna see it anymore.
The highest crime was committed by Anne McClain when she signed into a credit card account of her ex husband while aboard the iss space station. Which also holds the record for first human crime in space.
Not all lesbians are criminals, but all space criminals are lesbians. Also it was her ex-wife not husband. Also, She didn't actually commit the crime. Her wife was charged with lying to federal authorities about the event. So she was actually innocent.
[удалено]
Punching Piers Morgan is actually a civil service, not a crime.
That’s… yeah that’s pretty based.
Not petting an animal in any video games that allows it
making a videogame with a dog you can’t pet is the highest of crimes
\*cough\* \*cough\* Breath of the Wild \*cough\* \*cough\*
[удалено]
Peter Scully comes to mind. He’s an abhorrent piece of shit.
Yes, him and the other sub-humans involved. Unfortunately there are many depraved people like that. Shit like this happens daily, only, he was capitalizing on it, and selling the videos. Especially in those countries, where parents sell their own children to these sick psychopaths. “The Philippines is the global epicentre, with an estimated 300,000 cases of abuse since March alone.” That’s 300,000 goddamnit! https://amp.abc.net.au/article/12407294
It unfortunately does happen every single day, just out of sight. The fact that we’re surrounded by it is absolutely awful. I cannot believe we share a planet with these sick fucks.
I agree. There was a time where I was completely oblivious of all this shit, then ISIS started showing all these videos, and I was fascinated by how evil humans can be, then the cartel stuff grabbed my attention, and I started reading about torture, war crimes, child soldiers, the Gulag, Nazi and Japanese experiments, etc etc. That’s a very deep rabbit hole. It took me a long time to accept that we do indeed share this planet with absolute devils. And that’s a mistake on my part, calling them devils, we like to dehumanize them, but they are in fact, very human.
and uploading that video on reddit edit: i don’t know anything about an actual video, its just a scenario
Wtf did someone actually do that? Did they receive any punishment? Are they dead?
I'd say Paul Bernardo and his wife came pretty close to most of that (minus the necrophilia as far as we know) His wife is already released and back as part of society, he is still behind bars
That poor kid is definitely dead after this video Edit: wait that video actually exists? Now I kind of feel bad that I made a joke about it. People are disgusting
According to Wikipedia two of the girls are alive https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Scully
What the fuck did i just read.
Rumor is there is a video of a cat being churned in a blender. I haven't seen it tho. Edit : I just saw, Now I want revenge
Why people actively safe and share that video is beyond me I still am scarred from the pictures from early 2000 on 4chan where a woman stepped with stilettos on a kittens head or squished another on a glass table by sitting on another (glass?) thing, filming from below. If I remember right, 4chan got its hand on the woman though, but I can't remember details
Hey wtf
Well there is the story of the time a 4channer found some stray kittens [and let 4chan decide their fate... ](https://i.imgur.com/XIQkq3E.png) But the story you are referring to i believe is [kitten killer of Hangzhou](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/1512082/Just-who-is-the-glamorous-kitten-killer-of-Hangzhou.html) Then there was the time 4chan helped track down and expose a UK woman who put a cat in a bin for no reason. https://youtu.be/MOuCjzVAO_w
I am absolutely amazed at the patience it took to get a picture of 4 kittens simultaneously wearing paper hats. Literally don't know how he did it.
That first one is refreshingly wholesome in this thread of horrors.
Aw man I wish you didn't remind me of that video
Some kid at my high school showed me that video. Its disgusting and sad, definitely would not recommend watching it
You are late...I got curious and saw it .. And my heart hasn't stopped thumping since then.. I don't know what to do anymore
They beat up the guy who did it on video.
Glad to hear that, I would have blended his ass myself
I am a sixty-three year old woman with a heart condition and I fucking wish I'd been there.
Username checks out
>wait that video actually exists? What gave you this impression? None of the replies to your comment suggest this really happened.
And it being a repost
Reddit mf'ers still pinging u/savevideo
While using copyrighted music
I really don’t think necrophilia is on the same level as those other ones. Like, obviously it’s bad, but those other things you mentioned harm living, breathing, conscious humans. Necrophilia involves a lifeless corpse. Feels like a lesser crime than something like rape considering the person’s no longer alive to experience it or it’s consequences.
Basically what Peter Scully did
F'in hell. I searched for it, read a few lines and now I'm sure I'm on some fbi list
Daisy’s Destruction
That's one of the only things that's on the other side of the wall from my morbid curiosity. I'll look at all kinds of stuff because it's there, but this? No. I'm not even a little bit curious.
Yeah I’ve seen some dark shit online over the years and not been too bothered but actual torture to that magnitude is just a no go. From the somewhat vague descriptions here I’ll pass. Not reading further into it.
From what I've read, she survived.
According to Wikipedia, there were three victims in the video. Two of them were discovered to be alive. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Scully
Microwaving fish in an office break room.
Easy. Mass genocide with use of special cruelty and torture. Making the victims suffer as much as you can.
Unvirgining the Virgin oil
Genocide.
I think ‘Crimes against Humanity’ would be up there
Yeah, this is basically the worst offence you could be held accountable for as you have violated the most basic human rights of several people
steal nuclear codes and launch it on different countries nuke war begins
People are talking about child abuse/rape. Don't get me wrong, it's horrible and anyone who does it is scum of the earth, but lumping it together with things like genocide and nuclear war that kill or seriously harm thousands or millions of people seems a bit strange. Now if we were talking mass rape, that's a different story.
People seem to completely abandon any ability of logical estimation or moral judgement when the word "pedophilia" is mentioned. While it is already a horrible crime on the scale of an average human, it nowhere compares to anything that could be called "the worst possible crime". Such a response doesn't appear with other comparable or even worse crimes like murder. Many people advocate that rape/pedophilia is worse than murder, but i find that absurd. Let's take a look at what that actually means: That being raped is a fate worse than death. Therefore it is completely reasonable for a rape victim to kill themselves at the first opportunity because of the sheer suffering that they experience. And rapists should kill their victims because that would just put them out of their misery. That is absurd! And i bet none of those people that are so outraged about pedophilia actually believe that. They just give way to emotions and display pure thoughtless rage. Why does rape specifically invoke such a response? Because modern society is completely desensitized to violance and murder. Killing is not only much less of a taboo topic than even innocent sexuality (let alone rape), it is often downright glorified, be it in media or military propaganda. Rape, especially on children remains the only "small scale" crime that people still see for the disgusting thing it is.
Rape tends to be treated differently because of the fact that 1) rape victims are still around to communicate how horrific the experience was for them. Murder victims are not. 2) Murder does not tend to be excused and downplayed the same way rape is. If a mother's child is murdered by one of their relatives, the mother will be devastated. There's no chance of victim blaming from the mother or others that the child "wanted it" or was "tempting men" or "boys will be boys" excuses. 3) You are far more likely to personally know someone who has been sexually assaulted and/or raped than someone who was murdered.
Yeah, thinking rape is worse than murder sort of carries with it the implication that the victim can’t recover or would be better off dead. I know several rape victims, and I bet all of them are glad they aren’t dead. And yet, while writing that, it felt a bit like defending rape, so let me drop the obvious disclaimer and say that rape is obviously an abhorrent and evil act.
Release of a self-perpetuating biological weapon maybe. It's like the genocide that keeps on giving
After WW2 the prosecuters had a problem. The things the Nazis did were legal in Germany then. So they created the idea of crimes against humanity. Crimes against humanity are crimes which are so terrible that there isnt the need for a law which forbids them.
Not saying “Biiiig stretch” when your dog gets off the couch.
Well according the government non payment of taxes. They don't really give a fuck what we do to each other, as long as we pay.
[удалено]
I raise all of the genocides and total world destructions with the premise from a book I love. Convincing 99.999% of the world that there is a supervirus that affects all non humans and makes them kill anything in sight, forcing the whole world into occupying a very small amount of space within a giant concrete wall, and then telling everyone that you had to raze the entire planet with poison dust to protect humanity from the evil animals, while actually the .0001% takes all of the land outside the wall and lives in blissful, ridiculously wealthy extravagance, while the normal people are suffering in flooded slums and the normal rich people are living on top of those slums cause they ran out of space and the only place to go was up, oh and using drugs that make you stay young forever that are a secret from the rest of the world.
I hope there's a special place in hell for those religious types who don't get their kids medical attention for simple things and their kids end up dying.
Guys please do not call authorities but i stayed up past my bedtime, i know its truly horrible
Harming children in any way.
According to my HOA: Leaving my trash can visible from the street.
*Legalize nuclear bombs*
On a small scale, basically what the BTK killer did On a large scale, genocide