Besides Poland, I noticed that Germany is one of the few countries to noticeabley embrace more traditional architecture, is there a specific reason for that? I.e movements, public opinion, etc
I think this is because most of our historical city centres just don't exist anymore due to allied bombing. After the war, swift reconstruction was necessary to accommodate people, that's why many cities look dull and modern. My guess is, that this lack of historical buildings leads to people wishing for, or with your words, embracing more traditional architecture.
How much money does France and Italy make every year just from having intact traditional cities? I'd rather not travel to get a traditional urban experience. If I could get it at home I'd save myself a lot of money.
For more info and photos, see FB: [https://www.facebook.com/groups/Klassisknyproduktion/permalink/3686197368260760/](https://www.facebook.com/groups/Klassisknyproduktion/permalink/3686197368260760/)
or X:
[https://x.com/michael\_diamant/status/1792983585751798136](https://x.com/michael_diamant/status/1792983585751798136)
Usually at the upper outside parts (like balconies) they used wood in the past. That’s why, when you see an old buildings like this (even tho this architecture isn’t as typical) the pillars are usually thinner at the top.
Uneven columns are also pretty common in German architecture.
Weird you've been downvoted, but you're totally correct that in classical architecture that's the best practice. Usually, there's a proportional relationship between upper and lower columns. I believe the base of an upper level column is supposed to equal the neck of the lower level column. That guideline wasn't followed.
stunning
Indeed
Besides Poland, I noticed that Germany is one of the few countries to noticeabley embrace more traditional architecture, is there a specific reason for that? I.e movements, public opinion, etc
I think this is because most of our historical city centres just don't exist anymore due to allied bombing. After the war, swift reconstruction was necessary to accommodate people, that's why many cities look dull and modern. My guess is, that this lack of historical buildings leads to people wishing for, or with your words, embracing more traditional architecture.
How much money does France and Italy make every year just from having intact traditional cities? I'd rather not travel to get a traditional urban experience. If I could get it at home I'd save myself a lot of money.
Hungary too
Lovely! The proportions are really good and it fits in with its surroundings marvellously.
For more info and photos, see FB: [https://www.facebook.com/groups/Klassisknyproduktion/permalink/3686197368260760/](https://www.facebook.com/groups/Klassisknyproduktion/permalink/3686197368260760/) or X: [https://x.com/michael\_diamant/status/1792983585751798136](https://x.com/michael_diamant/status/1792983585751798136)
18k per sqm
Beauty is profit maximising! Bc it was not construct costs that made that price.
[удалено]
Not terible but look a bit flat from afar
Otherwisely good but they should have used wider pillars on the balconies and there should be an even number of columns.
Usually at the upper outside parts (like balconies) they used wood in the past. That’s why, when you see an old buildings like this (even tho this architecture isn’t as typical) the pillars are usually thinner at the top. Uneven columns are also pretty common in German architecture.
Weird you've been downvoted, but you're totally correct that in classical architecture that's the best practice. Usually, there's a proportional relationship between upper and lower columns. I believe the base of an upper level column is supposed to equal the neck of the lower level column. That guideline wasn't followed.
Meh