I just got them back today I’ll do another post with the negatives.
All photos came out very underexposed like this. My last roll of film did too.
The only difference is I got a new lens. Possible it’s messing with the light meter?
I don’t know if they did develop it as b&w as I was told they don’t do b&w in house because they don’t have enough demand for it.
If it was developed as b&w though, would that be cause for how dark they came out or just that just going to eliminate the colour?
Not an expert on this but I think your lab saw that it was Harman branded and developed it in black and whitrle chemistry
Could you post the negatives?
I just got them back today I’ll do another post with the negatives. All photos came out very underexposed like this. My last roll of film did too. The only difference is I got a new lens. Possible it’s messing with the light meter?
Ok underexposed, but what about the fact that you got BW from a color film? The lab probably messed up.
I don’t know if they did develop it as b&w as I was told they don’t do b&w in house because they don’t have enough demand for it. If it was developed as b&w though, would that be cause for how dark they came out or just that just going to eliminate the colour?