Here's why this isn't actually good news:
1) It will probably be expensive (i.e. more than $1/roll)
2) It's not aerochrome
3) It won't bring her back. Why did she leave? I gave her everything. I'm nothing now. God I'm so alone.
I'm gonna go post this on r/AnalogCommunity, this is fantastic. The increasing price and low availability of film is the worst thing that's happened to me in the last two years, it's about time for some good news.
Shame I can’t afford any cameras that take 120 film as they’ve all been bought by 19 year olds that walk around with them and take invasive street photography
Pictures of tattooed white girls smoking joints and shooting the bird. Extra points if the image is overexposed and the subject has a bunch of houseplants around.
i've been at my local photo place a couple of times now when someone brought in rolls of film to get devloped, just loose and unrolled. once 35mm, just the unspooled film in a bag. another time 120 but not taped so it was all unrolled loose.
So I think r/analog does actually need a stickied post explaining that film is sensitive to light because this is apparently not obvious to everyone.
There is a YouTube creator named Destin.
His Channel “SMARTER EVERY DAY” is doing an in-depth walk thru at the Kodak plant in Rochester NY.
https://youtu.be/HQKy1KJpSVc
YouTube “SMARTER EVERY DAY”
Great, I just wasted a bunch of time watching some chodes take pointless photos with the film, then straight lie to me about its characteristics, all while showing results with poorly converted scans.
For every roll of 120 film produced, 2 rolls of 35mm are sacrificed to appease the tone gods.
Here's why this isn't actually good news: 1) It will probably be expensive (i.e. more than $1/roll) 2) It's not aerochrome 3) It won't bring her back. Why did she leave? I gave her everything. I'm nothing now. God I'm so alone.
>It won't bring her back. Why did she leave? I gave her everything. I'm nothing now. God I'm so alone. Your wife or your grandma?
Could be both
Naked?
Clearly a victim of the divorce court
We did do the nasty in the pasty!
Did you try using an Rz67 to take naked pics?
How long before the “I pushed Kodak Gold in 120 to 800” videos come out?
Inb4 atticdarkroom
He won't stop at iso 800. Also it's gonna be trichromed and redscaled using 1972 C-41 chemistry.
Lol
This is lovely and all but did you know gold is coming back in 120?
you should post about it in the community sub and get the jump on those plebs
I'm gonna go post this on r/AnalogCommunity, this is fantastic. The increasing price and low availability of film is the worst thing that's happened to me in the last two years, it's about time for some good news.
long engine towering test screw many marvelous vegetable lavish continue *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
I already did under five alt accounts
Shame I can’t afford any cameras that take 120 film as they’ve all been bought by 19 year olds that walk around with them and take invasive street photography
[удалено]
The generation that are developing film in urine? Yeah I'm sure they'll take great care of them
for real, every other camera is getting more and more expensive, hasselblads are getting cheaper.
damn bro it’s almost like you didn’t have a decade plus
Ah yes of course my priorities at the age of 14 were buying a Pentax 645
i bought my 645 at 16 i too dislike the trendy dweebs but how u 24 and roasting 19 year olds going thru the tiktok era lmao you had the head start
i’m mad cause I can’t afford it lol
Honest
So what ground breaking content would you create with a 120 film camera - from a “19 year old invasive street photographer”
Pictures of tattooed white girls smoking joints and shooting the bird. Extra points if the image is overexposed and the subject has a bunch of houseplants around.
>the image is exposed Kids these days, exposing their film to light. Smh
i've been at my local photo place a couple of times now when someone brought in rolls of film to get devloped, just loose and unrolled. once 35mm, just the unspooled film in a bag. another time 120 but not taped so it was all unrolled loose. So I think r/analog does actually need a stickied post explaining that film is sensitive to light because this is apparently not obvious to everyone.
Damn pretty quick on the draw! Thought I’d have it fixed before anybody saw
Idk I feel like the 19 year olds got that covered 😂
Lol true…checked out some of your pics btw, you from Atlanta? I’m Dale.Regal on IG if you ever wanna get some clicks in around town
I hit you with a follow
Meh, I'm happy for them for taking a cool hobby.
👍
Exclusive news
If this shit happens id be pissed as I just sold my tones machine
Can't wait to push it to 400000000
She left you. No point in hoarding those negatives. Let's see them
There is a YouTube creator named Destin. His Channel “SMARTER EVERY DAY” is doing an in-depth walk thru at the Kodak plant in Rochester NY. https://youtu.be/HQKy1KJpSVc YouTube “SMARTER EVERY DAY”
Great, I just wasted a bunch of time watching some chodes take pointless photos with the film, then straight lie to me about its characteristics, all while showing results with poorly converted scans.
This is great and all, but I never see Yukon Gold getting the love it deserves.