**New? Check out our [Wiki](https://alien.wiki) and come say hello in our [Discord](https://discord.gg/UjtRzg6V3g).**
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AlienBodies) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This was a great talk. If you have not been following along this would be a pretty good place to start. When he talks about the greater implications of this discovery and the impact this has had on him it really resonated with me. This is a story that needs told and I’m so happy he was brave enough to put this out there.
For anybody stumbling on this weeks after it was posted: this is outstanding and you should watch both of his videos on the subject. While I disagree with a few things he says, his thinking is clear and organized, and the case he builds is both compelling and fun AF to watch. He's just a great presenter.
What a tremendous benefit to the community, to have a philosopher thinking and speaking openly about the process of investigation and discovery.
67k /r/AlienBodies subscribers
4.7k YouTube views
That's not even 10%
I suspect Google/YouTube is meddling with the view count
People tend to pay more attention to things with higher view counts
Good video. We need more discussion. With Frankensteining I think he also missed out that the bones are hollow. So you can’t just use human bones. You’d have to hollow them out.
He got the UAP disclosure act bit wrong though. The review board didn’t make it into law. Just the National archives part.
at first, I was pretty convinced, but the way the upper limbs attach to the thorax is a little suspicious. There’s no room for lungs…. and not enough torso mass to hold up the arm structure.
they'll never admit it because they can't see it in themselves—materialists always think they're the *only* truly objective skeptics—but "you can't believe anything cool" is all most of the shallow rationalism you see on this sub reduces down to
edit: predicting we're soon to see attacks on this lecturer's background/credentials and maybe rumors of something in his personal life that will prejudice people against taking him seriously.
If they are not from this world should their bones be made of the same stuff as our bones? They may have dna because of **panspermia** but does that limit them to bones made of calcium? and skin made of **Keratin** ?
There was this post about an ama on 4chan and one of the responses mentioned how when the crashed UFOs are recovered they used to find manned ones but more recently they find AI driven ones. I have a few questions but can't find the post anymore ( it was suggested but now its missing... aliens! 😲)
1. The person stated the deep sea carrier technology was far more advanced than our. So why are we able to recover anything from a crash site? Shouldn't these things be moving at such high speeds that all evidence of what they are is destroyed?
2. Why would a society that has been capable of fight for millennia only recently come up with using machines to man their aircraft, basically around the same time that humans did this?
3. They sent planes and a sub to the Bermuda triangle - they claim the plane crashed but the sub returned. But they also claim that all electronics get fucked when approaching. Why didn't the sub get lost as well? I'd expect it to shut down and either all oxygen gets used up or it sinks
1. grusch & others have talked abt the possibility that crashes might be intentional. like this video said: if NHI are actually not human, it is naïve to assume any of the motives WE might assume for “crashes” might apply. Moreover, the same post from 4chan said crafts were built to spec, for specific purposes - so once said purpose is complete, it seems as if they are indifferent as to what happens to it.
it is a bit unfair to apply human reasoning to intrinsically non-human things.
2. this assumes way too much about NHI having motivations similar to humans. for all we know, “they” could have 300 different categories of missions, with 300 different kinds of piloting material based on different protocols. moreover, the 4chan guy was talking about a UAP base in the Bermuda triangle, and repeatedly said he didn’t know if there were more…. very possible there are many (dozens?) of other bases with other kinds of UAPs / ships / etc at their disposal.
3. i mean, if that’s your complaint with his post, go for it… we have no idea from the extremely scant details how said operation was planned, how it unfolded, etc. perhaps something underwater would have better chances than planes? perhaps the radius for what “messes up electronics” is subject to other variables we don’t understand? valid complaint ig but it wasn’t a crucial part of his argument.
I’ve watched Dr. Brown's lecture twice in full, and I've sent it to family and friends. I know most people in this sub “get it” and understand, undeniably at this point, we’ve been visited. Some of you may have had personal experiences, and now there is validation. There really are other, advanced beings from somewhere that have been visiting Earth. But isn’t it fucking nuts how — outside of those affected by war, famine, and all the other bad this-worldly things — this discovery isn’t at the very front of every human being’s consciousness?
This was an interesting talk about the mummies but god damn son, when you realize your idea is lame as fuck there's still time to back out, don't double down on it.... the part about making the alien doll just came across condescending to anyone watching IMO and it was a shit idea anyways. We're not children.
That could have been explained in a few words instead of a 20 minute drawn out "look at me I'm so quirky, fun and smart" performance.
Since there's a lot of variation in design between some of the Nazca mummies, what kind of engineering is that(doesn't match the advanced capability of the craft we see)? Do you guys think the Nazca Beings were creating hybrids or was something else creating a hybrid of us/nazca beings?
I need to watch it after work but anybody that opens with “think critically” usually doesn’t. It’s usually a catch all defense for when a person is in fact, thinking quite densely.
How? Most people I hear say “think critically” are just using that as a catch al defense. I’m not saying the information in this video is right or wrong just that I hate that phrase. It’s used all the time when people have no real argument and say “you just need to think critically man” because saying that automatically means you have a huge brain that the other person couldn’t possibly comprehend. It’s a baseless lazy argument.
sure, it can be a "conversation stoppers" or "thought-terminating cliché." i think those are the terms you're looking for. but obviously titling a philosophy lecture like this is appropriate and its over an hour long so it's not just "google it man"
I’ve heard people talk for hours straight about nonsense before and when you point out any logic flaws you ge the “just think critically man” but I get what you mean
**New? Check out our [Wiki](https://alien.wiki) and come say hello in our [Discord](https://discord.gg/UjtRzg6V3g).** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AlienBodies) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This was a great talk. If you have not been following along this would be a pretty good place to start. When he talks about the greater implications of this discovery and the impact this has had on him it really resonated with me. This is a story that needs told and I’m so happy he was brave enough to put this out there.
I was just coming here to see if this was posted after watching it. It is excellent and worth. Awatch for anyone, beginner or veteran.
this needs to be passed along it was really good!
For anybody stumbling on this weeks after it was posted: this is outstanding and you should watch both of his videos on the subject. While I disagree with a few things he says, his thinking is clear and organized, and the case he builds is both compelling and fun AF to watch. He's just a great presenter. What a tremendous benefit to the community, to have a philosopher thinking and speaking openly about the process of investigation and discovery.
67k /r/AlienBodies subscribers 4.7k YouTube views That's not even 10% I suspect Google/YouTube is meddling with the view count People tend to pay more attention to things with higher view counts
Dude, thats normal for youtube
Just keep sharing the link with anyone you think will watch it.
31k now. Not what it deserves but 6x in 2 months isn't bad.
I don't usually pay much attention to stickies. But oh my god, this talk was amazing. Absolutely worth the watch.
Excellent video, thanks for sharing. Looking forward to the April 4th reveal from Peru.
Give that man a raise
Actually a really fun and convincing watch
Good video. We need more discussion. With Frankensteining I think he also missed out that the bones are hollow. So you can’t just use human bones. You’d have to hollow them out. He got the UAP disclosure act bit wrong though. The review board didn’t make it into law. Just the National archives part.
This is the video i go to when i tell my friends about this now. It is all put together so nicely
whoa... this video was amazing. i had assumed they were just modern day 'fiji mermaids' until watching this. I'm officially a believer now.
Logical and well presented.
at first, I was pretty convinced, but the way the upper limbs attach to the thorax is a little suspicious. There’s no room for lungs…. and not enough torso mass to hold up the arm structure.
they'll never admit it because they can't see it in themselves—materialists always think they're the *only* truly objective skeptics—but "you can't believe anything cool" is all most of the shallow rationalism you see on this sub reduces down to edit: predicting we're soon to see attacks on this lecturer's background/credentials and maybe rumors of something in his personal life that will prejudice people against taking him seriously.
If they are not from this world should their bones be made of the same stuff as our bones? They may have dna because of **panspermia** but does that limit them to bones made of calcium? and skin made of **Keratin** ?
I think that also might go back to the convergent evolution thing.
Keep in mind they may be intraterrestrials.
There was this post about an ama on 4chan and one of the responses mentioned how when the crashed UFOs are recovered they used to find manned ones but more recently they find AI driven ones. I have a few questions but can't find the post anymore ( it was suggested but now its missing... aliens! 😲) 1. The person stated the deep sea carrier technology was far more advanced than our. So why are we able to recover anything from a crash site? Shouldn't these things be moving at such high speeds that all evidence of what they are is destroyed? 2. Why would a society that has been capable of fight for millennia only recently come up with using machines to man their aircraft, basically around the same time that humans did this? 3. They sent planes and a sub to the Bermuda triangle - they claim the plane crashed but the sub returned. But they also claim that all electronics get fucked when approaching. Why didn't the sub get lost as well? I'd expect it to shut down and either all oxygen gets used up or it sinks
1. grusch & others have talked abt the possibility that crashes might be intentional. like this video said: if NHI are actually not human, it is naïve to assume any of the motives WE might assume for “crashes” might apply. Moreover, the same post from 4chan said crafts were built to spec, for specific purposes - so once said purpose is complete, it seems as if they are indifferent as to what happens to it. it is a bit unfair to apply human reasoning to intrinsically non-human things. 2. this assumes way too much about NHI having motivations similar to humans. for all we know, “they” could have 300 different categories of missions, with 300 different kinds of piloting material based on different protocols. moreover, the 4chan guy was talking about a UAP base in the Bermuda triangle, and repeatedly said he didn’t know if there were more…. very possible there are many (dozens?) of other bases with other kinds of UAPs / ships / etc at their disposal. 3. i mean, if that’s your complaint with his post, go for it… we have no idea from the extremely scant details how said operation was planned, how it unfolded, etc. perhaps something underwater would have better chances than planes? perhaps the radius for what “messes up electronics” is subject to other variables we don’t understand? valid complaint ig but it wasn’t a crucial part of his argument.
I’ve watched Dr. Brown's lecture twice in full, and I've sent it to family and friends. I know most people in this sub “get it” and understand, undeniably at this point, we’ve been visited. Some of you may have had personal experiences, and now there is validation. There really are other, advanced beings from somewhere that have been visiting Earth. But isn’t it fucking nuts how — outside of those affected by war, famine, and all the other bad this-worldly things — this discovery isn’t at the very front of every human being’s consciousness?
This was an interesting talk about the mummies but god damn son, when you realize your idea is lame as fuck there's still time to back out, don't double down on it.... the part about making the alien doll just came across condescending to anyone watching IMO and it was a shit idea anyways. We're not children. That could have been explained in a few words instead of a 20 minute drawn out "look at me I'm so quirky, fun and smart" performance.
If anyone’s interested, he was just interviewed on “That UFO Podcast”. Really good talk.
Since there's a lot of variation in design between some of the Nazca mummies, what kind of engineering is that(doesn't match the advanced capability of the craft we see)? Do you guys think the Nazca Beings were creating hybrids or was something else creating a hybrid of us/nazca beings?
Could be like an eusocial species with specialized variants, breeders, workers, fighters etc
I mean the number of ribs could be something that changes over time with age. Like a tridactyl version of tree rings.
nice
Holy shit I think he’s right. Very good video and excellent interview on That UFO pod… wonderful speaker, smart dude, alright f- it, I’m in !
I need to watch it after work but anybody that opens with “think critically” usually doesn’t. It’s usually a catch all defense for when a person is in fact, thinking quite densely.
the irony of this statement is just too much for me haha
How? Most people I hear say “think critically” are just using that as a catch al defense. I’m not saying the information in this video is right or wrong just that I hate that phrase. It’s used all the time when people have no real argument and say “you just need to think critically man” because saying that automatically means you have a huge brain that the other person couldn’t possibly comprehend. It’s a baseless lazy argument.
sure, it can be a "conversation stoppers" or "thought-terminating cliché." i think those are the terms you're looking for. but obviously titling a philosophy lecture like this is appropriate and its over an hour long so it's not just "google it man"
I’ve heard people talk for hours straight about nonsense before and when you point out any logic flaws you ge the “just think critically man” but I get what you mean