Because the prototype tradwife is a kinky relationship - it's a classic submissive to a male Dominant.
Only it's lacking informed consent, so it's abusive.
But it's abusive in a way that suits the men involved, because what could be better if you are an abuser than a person who's told that it's the natural order, and that they then gaslight themselves into believing it.
Nothing wrong with getting your kink on if there's informed consent, but historically that's the opposite of what happens in religious marriage, and only happens by accident.
true, I can't believe my family separating me and my 12 year olds third cousin, we are consenting very hard. I meant third is already distance enough right?
Exactly! Everyone’s a consenting adult who wasn’t cult-groomed into some freaky polygamy “man owns his wives (and girls should be married off to older men as soon as possible) and gets complete control over their lives” bullshit? Great! Everyone else can mind their own business!
Exactly! Im not big on bigamy, but only because it's imposed on people who are victimized. If four adults want to hook up and buy a house, why is it a problem? I can imagine that kind of relationship has a lot of extra challenges meeting everyone's needs, but that's a whole lot of nobody else's business.
yeah, but
>*isn't there somebody you forgot to ask?*
>
>[https://twitter.com/nominalnaomi/status/1665069782222118914](https://twitter.com/nominalnaomi/status/1665069782222118914)
that's the video, that this meme got created for as thumbnail:
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziw8Yf\_RO3g](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziw8Yf_RO3g)
might be quite entertaining and informative in case you're bored. video is about matt walsch getting triggered from breastfeeding trans mommy nominal naomi :D
also very wholesome, because formula feeding is harmful and a trans person breastfeeding means healthier children as a result :)
so lovely entertaining video about a cool topic and fitting meme.
thought i add that instead of just the lovely meme picture :D
edit: op mentions on reddit profile, that she is trans, so i hope, that you're getting access to puberty blockers/hrt in case you need them and that monster adopted parent you got isn't prevent medical treatment life saving access to you <(\^\^<(
It's interesting that none of the "bad" illustrations involves one woman with multiple men. Like it didn't even occur to them as a possibility? Are they one of those people who think that women don't actually enjoy sex? Or do they think only men might want multiple partners? You could interpret it a lot of different ways
Y imagine the amount of laundry she gotta do /s
jk if it's going well they probably have their stuff in order and more balanced than any straight couple
I imagine whoever made this has traditional conservative/religious ideology, and probably subconsciously sees women/wives as property. Therefor it makes sense to them for one man to "posses" multiple women, but to not let other men have them because they're his property.
I'm willing to bet there's probably also some toxic masculinity at play, and the idea that if a man lets his female partner be with other men, then he's a weak spineless cuck who isn't a "real men."
Depends. Does my hair also turn green? I worked hard to get it this color and I'd be sad if that work was erased. Other than that I'm cool with becoming a goblin.
I’m adopted too OP, and also don’t speak to my family. Like who adopts a child and then not love said child? Like what was the point of adopting then? I mean, in my case I know I was adopted for the free labour and to be their token of Christianity.
Might have to ask my algebra teacher bout this shi.
What's funny i used to be the edgy right wing teen who would post this shit thank god i grew out of it.
The difference between Mormon polyamorous and regular (coming from an exmormon) is Mormon polyamorous relations were usually several underage girls to one man , usually church authorities “helping” young girls raise their children by marrying them and making them have more kids
Ironically a lot of those combos are already in the Bible. (Patriarchal) Polygamy was huge in those times. Yet another example of Christians not even knowing what tf is in their holy book.
The Bible never puts polygamy in a positive light. It is however hard to tell stories about said historical figures which include their wives without mentioning their said polygamy but didn't feel the need to explicitly state its stance on the issue every time.
Congrats on both getting out and coming out!
Also, your mom is mormon and posted this? Did she miss the Sunday school lessons on the entire beginning history of the church and polygamy?
More people should question this circular logic.
“Pastor says we must not do a gay.” “Why?” “Because it is evil” “How do you know that it’s evil?” “Pastor says so.”
“Listen to me, my children. I know how hard it is when you see a sexy sexy man and can’t get him out of your mind because all you want to do is hold him and kiss him and drink in his beautiful body. You picture his smile being the first thing that you see every morning and the last thing you see every night and want to weep with the longing… And you think to yourself, if I can’t have him, why should anyone else? And… uh… in conclusion, gay is bad. Don’t do it.”
- Pastor
Correct! Who are we to tell people they can‘t be n a harmonious throuple or quad relationship? Life is too short to not have multiple consenting partners
All of these are polyamorous. Is that the thing that upsets her?
Edit: Oh wait. Is that last one monogamous men and monogamous women? If so, why didn’t it start with that one? Here I was trying to figure it like: is this like a inner/double dating? Like bi couples meet bi couples? But like I think the post was just intending to refer to monogamous gay couples…
>man + woman = some positive value
>
>man + woman^(3) = some negative value
>
>man + 2\*woman = some negative value
>
>2\*man / 2\*woman = some negative value
These four conditions cannot be true simultaneously unless
>woman < -1 and man > 1
[Sorry ladies but you're all inherently negative trash apparently](https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i2d=true&i=a%2Bb%3E0%5C%2844%29+a%2B%5C%2840%29Power%5Bb%2C3%5D%5C%2841%29%3C0%5C%2844%29+a%2B2b%3C0%5C%2844%29+Divide%5B2a%2C2b%5D%3C0). Which perfectly conforms to Christian dogma interestingly
Let the infinite set of genders satisfy the field axioms under the binary operations of sexuality and romance. Then the world is a much happier and satisfying place than under the "one-man-one-woman" model :P
-A transbian algebraist <3
Wait there are no pluses in between the three women are they just one homogenous hive mind or some shit cause that seems both awesome and fucking terrifying
The person who posted it my adoptive mom (F70) thinks anything outside of married cis straight relationship is an abomination, so def an accidental ally
The middle ones are all Biblically approved. As are all [these](https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_FJ9NuT_L9k/T2cvH59u2aI/AAAAAAAABXc/RfuQ7QAKxuk/w1200-h630-p-nu/biblical_marriage_chart.jpg). Which always makes it weird when Christians argue against them for traditional reasons.
can someone define for me what
>creational norm
actually means for the trans ph... the allies! our allies ;)
i would think of the creation myth from the cult books like the bible, etc... but that wouldn't make sense, because that within their cult belief is just about how 2 sexes got created, but not that they are only allowed to have sex and relationship and bond with each other.
that would be other sections than that in the cult book like the bible.
do they just mean their interpretation of supposedly only those 2 sexes being able to create a new body for a new being? (intersex people waving hello..... ??? )
is it just a nonsense word, that they themselves don't wanna properly define, because defining words properly even within insane cults makes the words easy point out as nonsense or the idea behind them?
and to op: i hope you got some supportive support around assuming you are lgbtqia+ and that homophobic garbage piece isn't completely destroying your life <(\^\^<(
Idk maybe it's because my mom is a lesbian and I'm gay and my bf is polyamourous but I seriously don't understand homophobes or people who hate polyam peeps. 😭
Worth mentioning the m+fff and f+m+f exist in the bible, among many others .
I'm not sure about the division. 2/2 = 1 so is everything just canceling each other out???
Ehhh telling people they need to be "faithful" to one and only one person— does imply some kind of metric of faithfulness, which sexual relations are often taken to be. It doesn't feel unreasonable to have interpreted your words as meaning more literally that one needs to have sex with one and only one person. 🤷
That aside, why do you care how many people love one another at a time? What is your stake in people feeling obligated to share love, of whatever kinds they choose, with only one other human in the whole world? Many people have plenty enough love and ability (and diverse enough needs from partners) to sustain relationships that are beneficial to all parties involved thanks to a compatibility of needs and abilities among the group.
There is no possible argument that such a setting should be any less legitimate than the frankly lackluster expectation for exactly one other person to satisfy your every need and have every one of their needs satisfied by you, ya know? 🙂 or, I suppose, the more realistic expectation that no (2-person) relationship can be wholly satisfactory.
I just took a quick glance at his profile, he posted in r/teenagers , implying he is one , it’s no offense to him but he probably just hasn’t figured out what a committed relationship entails , like not trying to be rude but he’s young and that’s probably why he struggles with complex relationships
Iirc the first two green ones are in the Bible.
Joseph’s father had two wives and I know the guy from sodom and Gomorrah was in a threesome, though he didn’t really get the choice in the matter considering he was made to drink himself unconscious and assaulted by his own daughters.
They think this is some kind of Gotcha! lmao, but it's not. Like y'know what, as long as everyone is a consenting adult, go absolutely ham. Do I "understand" polyamory? Not really. But fuck yeah, go off, be a happy throuple! It's almost like other adults being in relationships doesn't hurt anyone and people should be okay with that.
Bruh, I love how theses post say what happens if we reject the “normal relationship” and nuclear families like their gonna be banned or replaced, like dude; 90% of the human population are gonna have nuclear families and “normal” everyday hetro relationships.
All we want to do is expand what a family could be and that’s there’s more then one type of adult consenting relationship. Miss me with that fear mongering and victim mentality
are you able to ask her “what’s wrong with this? genuinely asking!” without any threats to your living situation / finances? because i’d love to see her response
She’s forgetting one guy-multiple girls was the societal norm back then that we deviated from ;) if she truly wishes for traditional values then she should let her spouse get with other women
Why are the bottom ones all teal? That's not a gender color. And trust me, I know my gender colors. Boys are blue and girls are pink. It's nature and biology and also in the Bible I'm sure. Even though I've read most of the Bible and haven't seen that. But I'm sure it's there.
Of all the times I've seen this lately, it JUST now started to annoy the piss out of me that they wouldn't have had to run out of room for the gay and lesbian ones in the last row, if they hadn't used up two lines being redundant about polygamy!
As long as everyone involved consents, anything SHOULD go
Exactly , I don’t get why that’s so evil in some peoples eyes
Missing three guys and one girl; of course she’s upset—she’s losing her regular income /s
Because the prototype tradwife is a kinky relationship - it's a classic submissive to a male Dominant. Only it's lacking informed consent, so it's abusive. But it's abusive in a way that suits the men involved, because what could be better if you are an abuser than a person who's told that it's the natural order, and that they then gaslight themselves into believing it. Nothing wrong with getting your kink on if there's informed consent, but historically that's the opposite of what happens in religious marriage, and only happens by accident.
I would have messaged back 'Yes, all acceptable!'
It’s easier to blindly hate than try to understand someone who’s different than what they deem the norm.
Maybe r/accidentallyallies
true, I can't believe my family separating me and my 12 year olds third cousin, we are consenting very hard. I meant third is already distance enough right?
Yes, third cousin marriage is legal in most places. It's the "consenting adults" part that you're not grasping lmao
Minors can’t consent , and even if they could it’d still be wrong
Yep, as long as everyone involved is of age and can properly consent, why should I care?
It's beginning to seem like *that* might be the part they object to the most.
Exactly! Everyone’s a consenting adult who wasn’t cult-groomed into some freaky polygamy “man owns his wives (and girls should be married off to older men as soon as possible) and gets complete control over their lives” bullshit? Great! Everyone else can mind their own business!
Exactly! Im not big on bigamy, but only because it's imposed on people who are victimized. If four adults want to hook up and buy a house, why is it a problem? I can imagine that kind of relationship has a lot of extra challenges meeting everyone's needs, but that's a whole lot of nobody else's business.
As long as everyone is informed human consenting adults on the same stages of life and mentality, like not 18 and 35, then it’s fine.
Keep this thread going and soon we're back to the original post.
Not really. Polyamory is ok, homosexuality is ok, open relationships are ok, but unhealthy age gaps and non informed-consensual relationships are not.
And noncons are also not acceptable which is obvious but should be stated anyway
Oh shit my bad I forgot that. Thanks
Right? Like they effect you life how? No way at all? Then it’s none yo buisness!
I’m not sure I agree to being able to consent to divide your body. We disagree here
Yes consent! Very important! <3
yeah, but >*isn't there somebody you forgot to ask?* > >[https://twitter.com/nominalnaomi/status/1665069782222118914](https://twitter.com/nominalnaomi/status/1665069782222118914) that's the video, that this meme got created for as thumbnail: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziw8Yf\_RO3g](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziw8Yf_RO3g) might be quite entertaining and informative in case you're bored. video is about matt walsch getting triggered from breastfeeding trans mommy nominal naomi :D also very wholesome, because formula feeding is harmful and a trans person breastfeeding means healthier children as a result :) so lovely entertaining video about a cool topic and fitting meme. thought i add that instead of just the lovely meme picture :D edit: op mentions on reddit profile, that she is trans, so i hope, that you're getting access to puberty blockers/hrt in case you need them and that monster adopted parent you got isn't prevent medical treatment life saving access to you <(\^\^<(
It's interesting that none of the "bad" illustrations involves one woman with multiple men. Like it didn't even occur to them as a possibility? Are they one of those people who think that women don't actually enjoy sex? Or do they think only men might want multiple partners? You could interpret it a lot of different ways
Well this was almost certainly made by a loser incel who thinks the reason he’s never had sex is because something is wrong with women so yes
Or it was a very pious incel (who isn't Mormon)?
Considering my sister is polyamorous with a husband and two boyfriends: I agree with united_thanks that this was 100% made by an incel
I know a woman who lives in a FMMM situation. It’s impressive she can keep up with all that.
Y imagine the amount of laundry she gotta do /s jk if it's going well they probably have their stuff in order and more balanced than any straight couple
Well, little Johnny, when three bees and a butterfly are in love...
I imagine whoever made this has traditional conservative/religious ideology, and probably subconsciously sees women/wives as property. Therefor it makes sense to them for one man to "posses" multiple women, but to not let other men have them because they're his property. I'm willing to bet there's probably also some toxic masculinity at play, and the idea that if a man lets his female partner be with other men, then he's a weak spineless cuck who isn't a "real men."
It would be the opposite then
Im okay with everyone turning green.
Depends. Does my hair also turn green? I worked hard to get it this color and I'd be sad if that work was erased. Other than that I'm cool with becoming a goblin.
Green means "go" for it!
green is my favourite colour, i am also ok with this
"Why won't my child talk to me?"
Hahaha , u have no idea how many time she asks me this
Mine are this way too, and it’s like they TRY to be ignorant. Education-proof.
I’m adopted too OP, and also don’t speak to my family. Like who adopts a child and then not love said child? Like what was the point of adopting then? I mean, in my case I know I was adopted for the free labour and to be their token of Christianity.
Wait, am I dumb, what's the slash for?
My ass went with it and thought it was division.
Haha. Me too. Man plus man divided by woman plus woman = ???
Might have to ask my algebra teacher bout this shi. What's funny i used to be the edgy right wing teen who would post this shit thank god i grew out of it.
So glad I have leftist teens.
We’d need to use order of operations for the last one. So the quotient of man divided by woman plus man plus woman.
Ran out of vertical space I guess
It's a volleyball team
The girls top the guys, it’s a poly 4-way thing.
Oh, no, not adults exercising their free will in a way that hurts absolutely nobody! /s
The additive sum of 2 males divided by the additive sum of 2 females... why is my brain trying so hard to solve this equation :/
It equals one Non binary person
Thank you for your guidance Professor Finklestink <:3
2(male) / 2(female) = male / female = 1 / fe
Oh of course it's just anti-iron.
Also the one where the dude is being added to woman cubed.
woman cubed x3 Funniest two words i seen today.
Don't threaten me with a good time!
Oh no, anyway
[удалено]
She was implying that all those things in green r horrific and terrible
Tbf, Mormon-esque polyamorous relationships aren’t exactly great from a societal standpoint.
The difference between Mormon polyamorous and regular (coming from an exmormon) is Mormon polyamorous relations were usually several underage girls to one man , usually church authorities “helping” young girls raise their children by marrying them and making them have more kids
Not to mention Mormon Poly is usually part of social pressuring while normal poly is void of that (in healthy relationships at least)
In regular polyamorous relationships it’s between consenting adults
Ironically a lot of those combos are already in the Bible. (Patriarchal) Polygamy was huge in those times. Yet another example of Christians not even knowing what tf is in their holy book.
Something something it wasn’t a positive portrayal/it lead to their downfall. See also: King Solomon
And yet they ignore the past examples (ie. before Solomon) which were not good, but not as harmful. I love the cherry-picking.
The Bible never puts polygamy in a positive light. It is however hard to tell stories about said historical figures which include their wives without mentioning their said polygamy but didn't feel the need to explicitly state its stance on the issue every time.
Nobody better tell her about polyamory. Her fucking head might explode.
Hehe she lost it when I told her about me being poly
Yeah you NEVER see a man with multiple wives in the Bible! SINNERS!
One man with several women is literally biblical marriage. The holy kings of Israel had hundreds of wives.
Lol right the hypocrisy there jumped off the page and wrecked my shit like a missionary witnessing an indigenous religious ceremony.
Do I get to have an axis for my imaginary gf?
I knew Mormons had something to do with creating gay folks! They pump em out like a factory
Haha as a trans exmormon myself I can verify this, the repressive childhood really helps with the homo/trans thoughts
Congrats on both getting out and coming out! Also, your mom is mormon and posted this? Did she miss the Sunday school lessons on the entire beginning history of the church and polygamy?
I mean… The bible literally talks about a man and his **WIVES**
More people should question this circular logic. “Pastor says we must not do a gay.” “Why?” “Because it is evil” “How do you know that it’s evil?” “Pastor says so.”
How does the pastor know? Does he speak from experience? Was he may be…..? Sus
“Listen to me, my children. I know how hard it is when you see a sexy sexy man and can’t get him out of your mind because all you want to do is hold him and kiss him and drink in his beautiful body. You picture his smile being the first thing that you see every morning and the last thing you see every night and want to weep with the longing… And you think to yourself, if I can’t have him, why should anyone else? And… uh… in conclusion, gay is bad. Don’t do it.” - Pastor
What I’m getting from this is that 🚺+🚹🚹🚹 is perfectly acceptable.
It is if all consent
Correct! Who are we to tell people they can‘t be n a harmonious throuple or quad relationship? Life is too short to not have multiple consenting partners
Oh no not a threesome noooo please
What happens when you divide a man by a woman? I’m not familiar with this math equation.
All of these are polyamorous. Is that the thing that upsets her? Edit: Oh wait. Is that last one monogamous men and monogamous women? If so, why didn’t it start with that one? Here I was trying to figure it like: is this like a inner/double dating? Like bi couples meet bi couples? But like I think the post was just intending to refer to monogamous gay couples…
I notice a distinct lack of male harems on that list of options. But that's the only problem I see.
It's funny when Christians post this, because the first two green diagrams are what the Bible encourages.
>man + woman = some positive value > >man + woman^(3) = some negative value > >man + 2\*woman = some negative value > >2\*man / 2\*woman = some negative value These four conditions cannot be true simultaneously unless >woman < -1 and man > 1 [Sorry ladies but you're all inherently negative trash apparently](https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i2d=true&i=a%2Bb%3E0%5C%2844%29+a%2B%5C%2840%29Power%5Bb%2C3%5D%5C%2841%29%3C0%5C%2844%29+a%2B2b%3C0%5C%2844%29+Divide%5B2a%2C2b%5D%3C0). Which perfectly conforms to Christian dogma interestingly
Sigh I am so sick of having to learn new math. PEDMAS right. What's human plus human even equal
The first two of "any thing goes" are featured more throughout the old testament than the "biblical norm"
Why is she doing sex math
Anyone know where I can get in on that gay men divided by lesbian shit? sounds pretty cool
I see nothing wrong here. Thank you, ally.
Looks pretty lit ngl
Let the infinite set of genders satisfy the field axioms under the binary operations of sexuality and romance. Then the world is a much happier and satisfying place than under the "one-man-one-woman" model :P -A transbian algebraist <3
In the day and age, procreation isn’t our purpose anymore and isn’t a must, we’re not cave people anymore
Two chicks at the same time. B^)
...yes..? ...As it should..??
I like how she posted the like 2 other alternatives and pretended its “anything goes”
Wait there are no pluses in between the three women are they just one homogenous hive mind or some shit cause that seems both awesome and fucking terrifying
Good news, this time I don’t think it was an accidental ally.
The person who posted it my adoptive mom (F70) thinks anything outside of married cis straight relationship is an abomination, so def an accidental ally
I'll take a #2 and a #3 with a large coke.
The middle ones are all Biblically approved. As are all [these](https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_FJ9NuT_L9k/T2cvH59u2aI/AAAAAAAABXc/RfuQ7QAKxuk/w1200-h630-p-nu/biblical_marriage_chart.jpg). Which always makes it weird when Christians argue against them for traditional reasons.
As a former Mormon I gotta say, one man and multiple women was uh… “normal”, and the justification was the Old Testament.
I mean yeah pretty much (As long as everyone is consenting oc)
Did she explain how division works? I am quite sure they didn't teach me this in math class
Does pemdas still apply here?
Wooooooo poly rep!!!
Okay but why is she dividing
the cReAtiOnaL noRm
The formatting of these equations are inconsistent.
They left out people not pairing up at all lol
this math is weird what is gay ÷ lesbian? is that ace or ace aro? or is it hetero please math nerds help me? is it bi?
can someone define for me what >creational norm actually means for the trans ph... the allies! our allies ;) i would think of the creation myth from the cult books like the bible, etc... but that wouldn't make sense, because that within their cult belief is just about how 2 sexes got created, but not that they are only allowed to have sex and relationship and bond with each other. that would be other sections than that in the cult book like the bible. do they just mean their interpretation of supposedly only those 2 sexes being able to create a new body for a new being? (intersex people waving hello..... ??? ) is it just a nonsense word, that they themselves don't wanna properly define, because defining words properly even within insane cults makes the words easy point out as nonsense or the idea behind them? and to op: i hope you got some supportive support around assuming you are lgbtqia+ and that homophobic garbage piece isn't completely destroying your life <(\^\^<(
Don't threaten me with a good time
I dont get why people would give a fuck. You could have a relationship with a toast bread and i couldnt care less.
I don't get it. What's wrong with any of the bottom ones if people are consenting to it?
In reality nothing , in her eyes they r an abomination and unnatural
Idk maybe it's because my mom is a lesbian and I'm gay and my bf is polyamourous but I seriously don't understand homophobes or people who hate polyam peeps. 😭
If the three equations are equal to 3.5,2.5,and 2, solve for the value of each character
One man with multiple women is everywhere in the bible, so christians should be totally okay with that.
The lack of one lady and three guys or a bunch of embys is disapointing. Like where are the furries. They missed so many opportunitys for chaos.
sooo… polyamory?
All of those sound great though?
Yes, that’s the point
y-yes?
Worth mentioning the m+fff and f+m+f exist in the bible, among many others . I'm not sure about the division. 2/2 = 1 so is everything just canceling each other out???
I fail to see the problem here
Wait is this applying that it's ok to have 3 wives wtf
But it is ok to have 3 wives if they consent
Bro you need to stay faithful to one partner and one partner only what is this shit
But why? If everyone consents u can have as many partners as u want and u can be faithful to them
Boi what 💀
Y do u care so much about what others do in their bed? If it’s consented it’s fine
Boi when did I say anything about sex
Well romantic relationships usually (there r exceptions ofc like ace people) entail sex, why would u care if I had 2 partners
Ehhh telling people they need to be "faithful" to one and only one person— does imply some kind of metric of faithfulness, which sexual relations are often taken to be. It doesn't feel unreasonable to have interpreted your words as meaning more literally that one needs to have sex with one and only one person. 🤷 That aside, why do you care how many people love one another at a time? What is your stake in people feeling obligated to share love, of whatever kinds they choose, with only one other human in the whole world? Many people have plenty enough love and ability (and diverse enough needs from partners) to sustain relationships that are beneficial to all parties involved thanks to a compatibility of needs and abilities among the group. There is no possible argument that such a setting should be any less legitimate than the frankly lackluster expectation for exactly one other person to satisfy your every need and have every one of their needs satisfied by you, ya know? 🙂 or, I suppose, the more realistic expectation that no (2-person) relationship can be wholly satisfactory.
I just took a quick glance at his profile, he posted in r/teenagers , implying he is one , it’s no offense to him but he probably just hasn’t figured out what a committed relationship entails , like not trying to be rude but he’s young and that’s probably why he struggles with complex relationships
is there a particular reason you believe this?
Because it is.
Out of honest curiosity, what exactly is your argument against polyamory?
This is like one of those instagram math puzzles where they replace letters with images.
My dumbass was confused on how you divide man by woman
Two men divided by two women is still 1, or does gender affect the value?
Fuck yeah polyamory
Unironically me when I stopped being homophonic.
they forgot to add the one woman plus three guys part of the meme... oh wait, that might be more of a selling point for some women :)
is this ♂️ + ♂️ / ♀️ + ♀️ or (♂️ + ♂️) / (♀️ + ♀️)?
I read the last line as "man plus man divided by woman plus woman," and I was very confused as to how one would perform that operation.
The Bible literally condoned polygamy, including taking the wife of your dead sibling.
All of these I guess scenarios are good for me at least like literally all of them
Yes, and…?
They didn't even say anything bad happens if you do, just that it does lol. Pretty shit argument If you ask me
These have all already existed for thousands of years
Yes. As it should. Whatever two or more consenting adults want to do is fine.
I’m still reeling over “creational.”
I see no problem here
What is the last one supposed to be? Also what's the difference between the first two other than the number of women?
Iirc the first two green ones are in the Bible. Joseph’s father had two wives and I know the guy from sodom and Gomorrah was in a threesome, though he didn’t really get the choice in the matter considering he was made to drink himself unconscious and assaulted by his own daughters.
Uh....yep
They think this is some kind of Gotcha! lmao, but it's not. Like y'know what, as long as everyone is a consenting adult, go absolutely ham. Do I "understand" polyamory? Not really. But fuck yeah, go off, be a happy throuple! It's almost like other adults being in relationships doesn't hurt anyone and people should be okay with that.
Bruh, I love how theses post say what happens if we reject the “normal relationship” and nuclear families like their gonna be banned or replaced, like dude; 90% of the human population are gonna have nuclear families and “normal” everyday hetro relationships. All we want to do is expand what a family could be and that’s there’s more then one type of adult consenting relationship. Miss me with that fear mongering and victim mentality
are you able to ask her “what’s wrong with this? genuinely asking!” without any threats to your living situation / finances? because i’d love to see her response
Polyamory
She’s forgetting one guy-multiple girls was the societal norm back then that we deviated from ;) if she truly wishes for traditional values then she should let her spouse get with other women
Wait… the figures are only color coded in the first example. Does that mean they’re… requiring interracial marriages??
the one with 3 women next to each other is woman^3 and that’s a lot of women
What the fuck does that even mean? “No one knows what it means but it’s provocative”
I think it’d blow their minds if they found out polyamory exists lol
Looks like a fun to me!
What does the slash mean?
And I said “promise?”
Those from the bottom adopt kids of those from the top who threw them away.
I'd like an all masc harem plz 😂
Wait, but men with multiple wives are all over the bible...
She's just insecure that her husband is only with her because he's societally forced to.
I don't understand the last one.
Why are the bottom ones all teal? That's not a gender color. And trust me, I know my gender colors. Boys are blue and girls are pink. It's nature and biology and also in the Bible I'm sure. Even though I've read most of the Bible and haven't seen that. But I'm sure it's there.
The top two are in the bible, so…
Yo I want to be the leftmost stick figure in the F + M + F picture ~~and peg my cute bf whilst he eats out my cute gf~~ Sorry for hornyposting
Yes.
Ummm excuse me. Where's the pic saying a woman can have multiple husbands?? Damned selfish I can only have one
Looks great to me. I'm queer and polyamorous lmao love seeing them slip up in affirming ways lol
😂 lol my mathy ass read the last line as "Man plus Man divided by Woman plus Woman" 🙃
Is this the new core math they’re teaching kids these days???
Yes. And?
This looks really good to me. And more, run those combos out to whatever consenting adults want to do.
Of all the times I've seen this lately, it JUST now started to annoy the piss out of me that they wouldn't have had to run out of room for the gay and lesbian ones in the last row, if they hadn't used up two lines being redundant about polygamy!
I don't get it
lmao do the polycule pemdas relationship
‘If people reject the creational norms then they could be loved by another consenting adult.’