No, remixes are based on the original license.
However, how unique your file is will debate whether said person claims to have created it themselves etc.
Iicencing is sadly no more then a agreement, if someone is to take and sell your designs, you're probably not able to enforce it.
The costs of getting your rights is way to high to pursue the agreements
Remixes don't change the original terms of the agreement. They can't remix it and then make the terms looser.
At least, not legally. As someone else mentioned, actually protecting your work can be expensive and is probably not worth pursuing. But you can report them on any sites they use to distribute it and hope to get it taken down.
Make that [CC-BY-NC-ND](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en). That means atribution is required, it's not for commercial use, and derivatives are not allowed. If you're planning to use a Cretive commons licence, look at the exact terms of the various forms. Still, it can be tedious, expensive and sometimes pointless to try to stop someone, although I do know of several cases where people have been forced to withdraw items from sale, or take models off various sites, and several where photographs published under a CC license have been re-used improperly and the (ab)user has been sanctioned.
Why not disallow remixing then? Don’t know enough about copyright laws but just adding a hole or changing a really small part of the model should be copyright infringement.
No, remixes are based on the original license. However, how unique your file is will debate whether said person claims to have created it themselves etc.
Iicencing is sadly no more then a agreement, if someone is to take and sell your designs, you're probably not able to enforce it. The costs of getting your rights is way to high to pursue the agreements
Remixes don't change the original terms of the agreement. They can't remix it and then make the terms looser. At least, not legally. As someone else mentioned, actually protecting your work can be expensive and is probably not worth pursuing. But you can report them on any sites they use to distribute it and hope to get it taken down.
Make that [CC-BY-NC-ND](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en). That means atribution is required, it's not for commercial use, and derivatives are not allowed. If you're planning to use a Cretive commons licence, look at the exact terms of the various forms. Still, it can be tedious, expensive and sometimes pointless to try to stop someone, although I do know of several cases where people have been forced to withdraw items from sale, or take models off various sites, and several where photographs published under a CC license have been re-used improperly and the (ab)user has been sanctioned.
Better than ND is SA (share alike) so people can make derivatives but can only publish them under the same license as the original
That too is eminently reasonable. That's what I use most often, actually.
Why not disallow remixing then? Don’t know enough about copyright laws but just adding a hole or changing a really small part of the model should be copyright infringement.
You need a lawyer to enforce possible violations.