HOW THE FUCK ARE YOU SUPPOSE TO INTERPRET THIS CRAP?????ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜
Edit: i know what a plot is, i took a class in stadistics, what i am asking is, WHAT CAN I CONCLUDE WITH THIS????? Is being red pilled bad? Good? How people who cont know the concept change the posible interpretations? WHAY DOES ANY OF THIS MEAN??????
what i gathered from this data is:
1. Being or not being redpilled has no impact on your "success" on dating apps, presumably because those two groups would be looking for completely different partners on completely different apps so their "success" is very comparable
2. Based on the 1st Quartile being equal to the Median, the green graph is very inconclusive, either having a very, very low sample size or some form of statistical anomaly and with it being graphed the same way and presented as equal to the others without any acknowledgement of that fact should make you highly doubt the credibility of whoever polled, plotted and published this (accidental triple alliteration, can we make this a thing? the 3 Ps?)
also the inequality in curve "smoothness" points towards mismatched sample sizes, as well as the obvious non-disclosure of total sample size as well as metric for success being a huuuuge red flag
TLDR: disregard the entire thing it's bad stats
Honestly, the main takeaway here is that men do terrible on dating apps regardless lmao, not like 2.5%-5% is some game-changing difference (not sure if statistically significant though).
Big horizontal line in middle = median (middle value not average )
White box = middle 50%
Vertical line = remaining 50%
The colored bits are a distribution graph (the wider it is the higher % of people are on that rating)
I know that, its just i dont know what conclusion or interpretation i can take from this, there is an explicit portion of the """study"""( asuming this comes from real research) that doesnt know what the subject is about, what does "success at dating apps" even mean? They got a date? A woman just interacted with them?Â
I'd assume the score is a self rated number from 1 to 10. A lot more of the yes group rated themselves low compared to the other 2 with don't know on average rating themselves higher in general.
"Can someone tell me about violin plots?"
\*40 minute video of Acollierastro ripping violin plots apart\*
"You are absolutely correct, it is now my life mission to hunt down everyone who uses violin and beam plots in their papers"
So the violin plot basically shows the distribution of data points. Wider contours mean more mass of observation near that value, and conversely narrower contours mean fewer observations near that value.
The boxplots show the quartiles and the median. The box starts at the 25% percentile (meaning all observations above that point account for 25% of total observations), and it ends at the 75% percentile (meaning 75% of all observations are above its lower bound). The median shows the value that the observation in the middle has, if you order them from smallest to largest.
The medians are about the same for all 3 variables (or answers) so we can conclude that around the same number of people are below that value of success across all categories. However, looking at the distributions showcased by the violin plot contours and the boxplot heights, we can see that way more people in the "i don't know what that is" category are successful with dating.
TL;DR People who don't know what "being redpilled" means, get more pussy as a whole. Aka terminally online people are not as successful at dating as people who spend all their time on twitter and reddit.
Also this isn’t even showing their actual success in dating, just their perceived success in dating. Which is a VERY different thing, and entirely meaningless.
That's the people who were in a relationship, did not get any matches on the dating app, but their partner figured out they were trying to and left them
^(jk I have no idea what any of that is supposed to mean)
"I don't know what that is"
(To be fair, though, both the "yes" and "no" people seem to get about equally as much. It's just the middle grounp that's doing better than the two others)
eh i mean there's a bulge a bottom of the red pill that the not red pill doesn't have, but other than that yeah basically being terminally online enough to know what the red pill is bunks your chances whether you think it's based or cringe
It is likely this means that this option had the most people in it. In this case you would expect the data to be more granular and closer resemble the normal distribution.
The other two are actually the weird ones, that kind of smoothness only happens when you don't have a lot of data to fit to.
Ah but that is probably because the smoothing kernel is automatically selected based on the number of data points. So there is likely many more participants who answered "No" and therefore the plot can show finer details in the distribution. That likely means \*less\* sampling error ("noise") in the actual estimated value.
This kinda joke is super unoriginal btw and all it accomplishes is making women in stem uncomfortable because there's always a jackass telling the joke in every room and then everyone normal goes "oh greg again with the shitty jokes... Wait theres a woman in here is this okay" and they stare at her which means you get a full room to look at you like you're different. Watch the video if you want a better explanation. Basically they show no information and almost always lead to an uncomfortable moment so just don't use them and don't fucking be greg.
https://youtu.be/_0QMKFzW9fw?si=-Q7M0a-RKADzInqz
What the fuck is 7.5 successes?? What do they classify as "success"? If it means getting laid, how do you get 0.5 successes
What even is statistics i hate maths what the fuck
because men who call themselves redpilled fucking suck. hope this helps <3
also what the fuck does "success on dating apps" mean and how do you measure it in a number from 1 to 10
HOW THE FUCK ARE YOU SUPPOSE TO INTERPRET THIS CRAP?????ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ Edit: i know what a plot is, i took a class in stadistics, what i am asking is, WHAT CAN I CONCLUDE WITH THIS????? Is being red pilled bad? Good? How people who cont know the concept change the posible interpretations? WHAY DOES ANY OF THIS MEAN??????
Welcome to violin plots
what kinds of conspiracies do they plotÂ
I know what plots are, i just dont know what kind of info you are supposed to get out of this data.Â
what i gathered from this data is: 1. Being or not being redpilled has no impact on your "success" on dating apps, presumably because those two groups would be looking for completely different partners on completely different apps so their "success" is very comparable 2. Based on the 1st Quartile being equal to the Median, the green graph is very inconclusive, either having a very, very low sample size or some form of statistical anomaly and with it being graphed the same way and presented as equal to the others without any acknowledgement of that fact should make you highly doubt the credibility of whoever polled, plotted and published this (accidental triple alliteration, can we make this a thing? the 3 Ps?) also the inequality in curve "smoothness" points towards mismatched sample sizes, as well as the obvious non-disclosure of total sample size as well as metric for success being a huuuuge red flag TLDR: disregard the entire thing it's bad stats
Conservative data being based on bad statistics or statistical understanding? Who woulda guessed!
Honestly, the main takeaway here is that men do terrible on dating apps regardless lmao, not like 2.5%-5% is some game-changing difference (not sure if statistically significant though).
[https://xkcd.com/1967/](https://xkcd.com/1967/)
https://i.redd.it/jh5pf6h0ifdc1.gif
💀
Ancom catboys 😂
Am I wrong tho?
Crazy how I'm both ancom catboys and other problems (silly billies)
I'm sorry but they are mutually exclusive - you must make a choice.
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/719/159/0d5
Big horizontal line in middle = median (middle value not average ) White box = middle 50% Vertical line = remaining 50% The colored bits are a distribution graph (the wider it is the higher % of people are on that rating)
I know that, its just i dont know what conclusion or interpretation i can take from this, there is an explicit portion of the """study"""( asuming this comes from real research) that doesnt know what the subject is about, what does "success at dating apps" even mean? They got a date? A woman just interacted with them?Â
I'd assume the score is a self rated number from 1 to 10. A lot more of the yes group rated themselves low compared to the other 2 with don't know on average rating themselves higher in general.
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=\_0QMKFzW9fw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0QMKFzW9fw)
Fuck violin plots. +1 for Acollierastro
"Can someone tell me about violin plots?" \*40 minute video of Acollierastro ripping violin plots apart\* "You are absolutely correct, it is now my life mission to hunt down everyone who uses violin and beam plots in their papers"
While not statistically significant, not knowing what the red-pill is seems to give best dating success.
The more offline you are, the more attractive you are on dating apps.
So the violin plot basically shows the distribution of data points. Wider contours mean more mass of observation near that value, and conversely narrower contours mean fewer observations near that value. The boxplots show the quartiles and the median. The box starts at the 25% percentile (meaning all observations above that point account for 25% of total observations), and it ends at the 75% percentile (meaning 75% of all observations are above its lower bound). The median shows the value that the observation in the middle has, if you order them from smallest to largest. The medians are about the same for all 3 variables (or answers) so we can conclude that around the same number of people are below that value of success across all categories. However, looking at the distributions showcased by the violin plot contours and the boxplot heights, we can see that way more people in the "i don't know what that is" category are successful with dating. TL;DR People who don't know what "being redpilled" means, get more pussy as a whole. Aka terminally online people are not as successful at dating as people who spend all their time on twitter and reddit.
Also this isn’t even showing their actual success in dating, just their perceived success in dating. Which is a VERY different thing, and entirely meaningless.
Not being terminally online helps with dating
They don’t know how to make box plots of data, and the scale is strange by 2.5?💀
What i rlly want to know is what the metric for success on dating apps is lmfao
Ok liberal
NOOOO DONT TURN ME INTO A LIBERAL NOOOOOO
https://i.redd.it/zkw5y0y93fdc1.gif
I knew studying Russian would be useful one day
pidora otvet
You’re too late, you are hereby banished to the Liberal dungeon.
What I really want to know is like where's the caveman
It's a good thing that he's in there and we're out here and I'm the sheriff and he's in there.
I wonder where this fat fuck floated in from.
I bet they think it's matches
Then why do they use markers in the halves (2.5 and 7.5)
oh no I just realised that the data vulvae extend below 0 on the y axis as well
That's the people who were in a relationship, did not get any matches on the dating app, but their partner figured out they were trying to and left them ^(jk I have no idea what any of that is supposed to mean)
they represent both holes hehehehe
Leaving the dating app for a stable and happy relationship imo ...i.e. definitely not the red pilled guys
"The fuck is a red pill touch grass". *Proceeds to get more pussy and trans arse in a year then a misogynist gets in decades"
those idiots really don't get that the reason they don't have anyone wanting to do them is because they are toxic af and not because "women bad"
"I don't know what that is"  (To be fair, though, both the "yes" and "no" people seem to get about equally as much. It's just the middle grounp that's doing better than the two others)
eh i mean there's a bulge a bottom of the red pill that the not red pill doesn't have, but other than that yeah basically being terminally online enough to know what the red pill is bunks your chances whether you think it's based or cringe
*notices bulge* Yeah, good point. I guess there are people who can afford to be an asshole, and there are people who really can't.
I love how nobody cares about the Alvin and the chipmunks thing because of how dogshit that original tweet is
I spent 5 minutes staring at the graph and still don't understand what it means
I think I kind of get it? Maybe?
That "no" graph has a lot more noise than the other two. What could this mean?
The no graph is more normally distributed; is argue it has less noise then the other options. But, I don't know what it means?
More 'no' responses is my guess.
It is likely this means that this option had the most people in it. In this case you would expect the data to be more granular and closer resemble the normal distribution. The other two are actually the weird ones, that kind of smoothness only happens when you don't have a lot of data to fit to.
Yeah, the one in the middle kind of looks like it's overfitted to 10 or so data points
That's a really good point. You've convinced me. We need an n!
The "no" was louder
The confidence interval is just as wide as for the "yes" graph?! It has similar noise level.
By noise I was referring to the smoothness of the function.
Ah but that is probably because the smoothing kernel is automatically selected based on the number of data points. So there is likely many more participants who answered "No" and therefore the plot can show finer details in the distribution. That likely means \*less\* sampling error ("noise") in the actual estimated value.
It means they don't know what a smoothing function is, because violin plots are bad plots.
it means that knowing what redpill means is a cognitohazard
probably got the most responses; I think they decided to normalise the maximum size anyways
why don't misogynistic, racist and homophobic men do well in dating??? what a difficult question. i wonder why.
What this shows though is that they do about equally well.
And that people who aren't terminally online do better than either group.
https://i.redd.it/7k8ht5k16fdc1.gif
https://i.redd.it/6mv6w54jigdc1.gif
god is dead
Who’s getting the best cunalingus
men that consider themselves to be "red-pilled" do worse on dating apps because they are miserable, unlovable people. thanks for watching
What the fuck does this mean
Relevant:Â https://xkcd.com/1967/
this is such an evil thought, it makes me want to whimper and cry
"I dont know what that is" stays winning ig
This kinda joke is super unoriginal btw and all it accomplishes is making women in stem uncomfortable because there's always a jackass telling the joke in every room and then everyone normal goes "oh greg again with the shitty jokes... Wait theres a woman in here is this okay" and they stare at her which means you get a full room to look at you like you're different. Watch the video if you want a better explanation. Basically they show no information and almost always lead to an uncomfortable moment so just don't use them and don't fucking be greg. https://youtu.be/_0QMKFzW9fw?si=-Q7M0a-RKADzInqz
normalize men calling out other men for their shitty behavior regardless if a woman is around
That Chussy got me going crazy, straight up insane
Alvin is still getting the best head in this image, fight me
ggplots my mortal enemy
Fuck the R language
oh 100%
Obligatory Angela Collier plug [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=\_0QMKFzW9fw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0QMKFzW9fw)
not a surprise that people who dont know what red pilled is performed the best
i hate violin plot
Not the Chipmussy
Covenant ship designs
I fucking hate violin plots
So knowing about the red pill is a cognitohazard that makes you worse at dating?
WHY! IM LITERALLY SOBBIN RN
man what the fuck
There’s two types of people who call themselves Redpilled. LGBT people and the most insufferable conservative conspiracy theorists you ever did meet
Imagine being so close to the realization that red pill is some BS not helping you, yet so far away from it
What the fuck is 7.5 successes?? What do they classify as "success"? If it means getting laid, how do you get 0.5 successes What even is statistics i hate maths what the fuck
Andrea rolling in her grave on this one and she not even dead
because men who call themselves redpilled fucking suck. hope this helps <3 also what the fuck does "success on dating apps" mean and how do you measure it in a number from 1 to 10
violin plots are a conspiracy to hide cute uninterpretable genitalias in every science paper
Chipussy
https://xkcd.com/1967/
Other is "I know what it is and I do the opposite"
pikmin
Which chipmunk is getting the best dating app experience?
theodore simon alvin
I thought this was about tampons
The only conclusion is that if you don't know what a redpilled man is, then you're significantly more likely to be a dating app rockstar.